1. Alliance for Pediatric Quality DRAFT Quality Reporting HIT Standards Project July 2007

2. www.kidsquality.org DRAFT 2 1.Goal 2.Participants 3.Rationale 4.Project Overview 5.How to Participate

3. www.kidsquality.org DRAFT 3 Quality Reporting Document Architecture Develop a standard for healthcare information systems to communicate quality measurement data across disparate systems in a standardized fashion. QRDA: Project Goal

4. www.kidsquality.org DRAFT 4 Founders Project Management HL7 Sponsor Primary Benefactor For Phase One Participants: A Private Collaborative

5. www.kidsquality.org DRAFT 5 Using Data for Quality Performance Measurement * Problem Time-consuming and problematic operations for data acquisition from electronic systems Multiple and disparate systems within health care organizations complicate data mining and coordination of efforts Resource-intensive data mapping efforts to link systems and performance measurement data requirements Conflicts or differences between administrative data sets Physicians and providers struggle to meet increasing demands for performance data *Source: Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality Opportunity Support efficient collection, aggregation and reporting of quality measurement information Among providers within a healthcare system Among providers from different healthcare systems Among providers and requestors of quality data (e.g. QIOs, payers, accrediting orgs, etc.) More… Support adoption of quality measurement Among developers of health information technology systems Among providers and payers

6. www.kidsquality.org DRAFT 6 Example: Traditional Quality Measure Reporting Medical Record (Paper, EMR) Manual Abstraction Administrative Data Ad Hoc Forms Ad Hoc Databases IT Assistance, Manual Data Entry Provider scrubbing periodic reporting documentation Requestors of Quality Data (e.g. quality improvement organization) Requestors of Quality Data (e.g. payer) Requestors of Quality Data (e.g. accrediting org) IT Assistance, Manual Data Entry IT Assistance, Manual Data Entry Provider sends one set of measure information to multiple requestors of quality data

7. www.kidsquality.org DRAFT 7 Example: QRDA Simplifies Quality Measure Reporting Medical Record (Paper, EMR) Manual Abstraction Administrative Data Ad Hoc Forms Ad Hoc Databases Provider HL7 v3 message, QRDA periodic reporting documentation Requestors of Quality Data (e.g. quality improvement Organization) Requestors of Quality Data (e.g. payer) Requestors of Quality Data (e.g. accrediting org) Provider sends one set of measure information to multiple requestors of quality data

8. www.kidsquality.org DRAFT 8 Hospital or Ambulatory Information System ADT RIS/PACS LIS PIS Requestors of Quality Data EDIS QRDA HL7 v3 Standard Specification

9. www.kidsquality.org DRAFT 9 Goal: Shared Approach to Document Architecture Quality Reporting Document Architecture Measure Name Measure Set Submitting Entity Receiving Entity Procedure Code Diagnosis Code Lab Results Criteria Patient/Provider data Etc… quality measure Data Elements in Common Format Measure Name Measure Set Submitting Entity Receiving Entity Procedure Code Diagnosis Code Lab Results Criteria Patient/Provider data etc. quality measure

10. www.kidsquality.org DRAFT 10 Phase One: Define project opportunity Select standards development expert for support Secure endorsement and funding Recruit volunteers Develop prototype QRDA- compliant reports Make recommendations for moving forward Secure endorsement and funding for Phase Two QRDA Project Overview Phase Two: Ballot and publish QRDA Draft Standard for Trial Use through HL7 Training material and support for vendors adopting the QRDA for pilot measures; Guidelines on prioritized reporting measures Conduct proof of concept demonstrations 3 monthsTBD

11. www.kidsquality.org DRAFT 11 1.Data elements for pilot measures Using NQF-endorsed quality measures; 2 adult outpatient; 2 pediatric inpatient 2.Minimum of two clinical document architecture samples of quality reporting document 3.Training and education for project team and interested stakeholders 4.Description of relationship of this project with other, similar efforts 5.Coordination with related efforts 6.Description of options for moving forward 7.Definition of benefit from IT perspective 8.Webcast on findings Major Phase One Deliverables

12. www.kidsquality.org DRAFT 12 Certification Commission for Health Information Technology - For possible vendor certification of the QRDA standard Collaborative for Performance Measure Integration with EHR Systems - Addressing performance measure functionality and integration with EHRs - Facilitating integration, calculation and reporting of measures within vendor products for reporting - Includes American Medical Association, National Committee on Quality Assurance and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Health Information Technology Standards Panel American Health Information Community - Promoting automation of quality data reporting - Developing quality use cases Health Level Seven - Vehicle for publishing the QRDA standard - Working with Clinical Interoperability Council, Electronic Health Record Technical Committee, Government SIG, Pediatric Data Standards SIG, Structured Documents Technical Committee, and more Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise - Driving vendor adoption of standards Leverage and Harmonize With Others

13. www.kidsquality.org DRAFT 13 Phase One: Volunteer Opportunities Volunteer OpportunitiesExpertiseImmediate Commitments Technical Content Experts (Source Organizations) hospitals and physician offices adult and pediatric Have understanding of how quality measurement data is collected and sent to receiving organizations Private phone call in July with consultant to share experiences Review of draft deliverables and conference call Aug. 14, 1-2:30 pm CST to react Technical Content Experts (Receiver Organizations) Have understanding of how quality measurement data is captured and reported Private phone call in July with consultant to share experiences Review of draft deliverables and conference call Aug. 14, 1-2:30 pm CST to react Clinical Content ExpertsHave familiarity with clinical content of some or all of the sample quality measures being used in this project Available to respond to email and/or phone questions about sample quality measures used for this project HL7 ExpertsHave an interest in learning the HL7 method for developing future vendor implementation guides for quality measures using QRDA Involvement in major project activities Participation in training later in the project ConnectorsHave an understanding of related activities within other organizations Help the project team connect dots with other activities

14. www.kidsquality.org DRAFT 14 Volunteer List – How to Participate Volunteer RolesVolunteers Technical Content Experts (Source Organizations) Feliciano Yu, MD. Childrens Hospital of Alabama Chad Bennett, Iowa Foundation for Medical Care TBD Technical Content Experts (Receiver Organizations) Bob Underwood, CHCA TBD Clinical Content Experts TBD HL7 Experts Bob Underwood, CHCA TBD Connectors TBD Contact joy.kuhl@chca.com if you are interested in: serving on the phase one project team in one of the volunteer roles joining an email list to stay up-to-date on major project activities

15. www.kidsquality.org DRAFT 15 Chad Bennett Iowa Foundation for Medical Care The Collaborative for Performance Measure Integration with EHR Systems cbennett@ifmc.org Crystal Kallem American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) HL7 Structured Documents Technical Committee crystal.kallem@ahima.org Joy Kuhl, Project Facilitator Alliance for Pediatric Quality HL7 Pediatric Data Standards Special Interest Group joy.kuhl@chca.com Feliciano Yu, MD HL7 Pediatric Data Standards Special Interest Group The Childrens Hospital of Alabama fyu@peds.uab.edu Primary Project Contacts

16. Alliance for Pediatric Quality DRAFT

17. www.kidsquality.org DRAFT 17 200+ childrens hospitals and 60,000 pediatricians using the same play book to improve care Alignment of physicians and hospitals is essential to improvement progress Combined expertise and spheres of influence will accelerate improved quality for children Hospital Community Physician Community Four national pediatric organizations aligned to improve the quality of health care for Americas children. Alliance for Pediatric Quality

18. www.kidsquality.org DRAFT 18 Alliance Goals & Strategies 1.Promote meaningful pediatric improvement and measures Promote initiatives using measures for improvement Spread use of measures for improvement and public reporting Develop a comprehensive catalogue of pediatric improvement priorities and measures 2.Ensure health information technology works for children Seek industry-wide adoption of data standards for pediatrics Promote integration of child health EHR-S standards into vendor systems Endorse pediatric data standards that make comparability possible 3.Explore opportunities for collecting and sharing data Our Strategies Work for consensus – speak with one voice for improvement in quality for children; advance pediatric improvement initiatives, measures and data/health information technology Endorse and promote projects that advance pediatric quality and health information technology Convene stakeholders Advocate in media and legislature

19. www.kidsquality.org DRAFT 19 Project Fit With Alliance Mission Alliance for Pediatric Quality HL7 PeDSSIG With other HL7 committees, organizations and vendors within the HL7 enterprise Lead, shape and accelerate recognition and adoption of quality improvement Promotes improvement priorities Provides specific data elements for pediatric quality measures Maps data elements to HL7 RIM Develops HL7 v3 Implementation Guideline for measure/s using QRDA standard Vendor EMR systems and other systems Adopts HL7 implementation plan through system updates Develops internal logic/algorithms to capture data elements for specific measure/s Validates and tests accuracy of data output for specific measure Reporting Facility Practice/Healthcare Institution Purchases vendor that complies with HL7 standards Receives functionality through vendor system Participates in reporting to Improvement Organization (s) Requestors of Quality Data Or other central quality assurance bodies such as CHCA, NACHRI, etc. Accepts QRDA data-submissions for benchmarking CCHIT Possible vendor certification of compliance