Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL."— Presentation transcript:

1 Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL

2 Proportional Curtailment of Firm PTP and Firm GTL – Problem Statement Provide equal treatment of FIRM Point-to-Point (PTP) Transaction impacts and FIRM Generation-to- Load (GTL) Impacts during a TLR event – Flowgate allocation does not downgrade FIRM PTP and GTL transactions to NON-FIRM – TLR curtailment of FIRM contributions requires the issuance of a TLR-5 or higher – FIRM contributions are NOT curtailed in TLR-3a, TLR-3b and TLR-4 Allocations are based on forecasted/reserved (Expected) FIRM usage of flowgates up to but not exceeding the flowgate limit – Expected FIRM usage is determined in the Day-Ahead and Hour-Ahead – All Expected FIRM contributions to the flow on the flowgate are included – The total Expected FIRM contributions does not exceed the flowgate limit: BAs and TSPs are allocated FIRM limits to their contribution on the flowgate that equals its total Expected FIRM contributions – The total Expected FIRM contributions exceeds the flowgate limit: BAs and TSPs are allocated FIRM limits to their contribution on the flowgate proportional to their contribution FIRM contributions are placed in two curtailment buckets – LAST TO CUT (LTC) and FIRST TO CUT (FTC) – Nomenclature: PTP transactions:FTC = 7-FLTC = 7-FC GTL:FTC = 7-FNLTC = 7-FCN – FIRM contributions in FTC and LTC are determined in real-time based on current system conditions – LTC: FIRM contributions in the LTC bucket are those that do NOT exceed the Expected FIRM usage of the flowgate for FIRM PTP and GTL impacts – FTC: FIRM contributions in the FTC bucket are those that exceed the Expected FIRM usage of the flowgate for FIRM PTP and GTL impacts

3 Proportional Curtailment of Firm PTP and Firm GTL - Example Flowgate limit:500 MW EntityDA/HA Firm GTL Impact DA/HA Firm PTP Impact GTL Firm Limit PTP Firm Limit A15075 B C16080 D E Total ,000500

4 Proportional Curtailment of Firm PTP and Firm GTL - Example Flowgate limit:500 MW EntityGTL Firm Limit PTP Firm Limit RT Firm GTL Impact RT Firm PTP Impact Over (Under) Allocation A75805 B B6050(10) C80 0 D D10080(20) E2010(10) E25305 Total

5 FTC and LTC Calculations TLR 5-a requires curtailment of 65 MW of FIRM transactions after exhausting all NON-FIRM curtailments – 65 MW of relief will be provided pro-rata from 90 MW of FTC (7-FC and 7-FCN), using the same TLR pro-rata formulas – 460 MW of LTC (7-F and 7-FN) are not curtailed EntityGTL Firm Limit PTP Firm Limit RT Firm GTL Impact RT Firm PTP Impact Over (Under) Allocation FTCLTC A B B6050(10)050 C80 00 D D10080(20)080 E2010(10)010 E Total

6 Proportional Distribution of Under-Allocated Amounts to Over-Allocated GTL/PTP – Issues To Be Resolved Sum of all LTC (7-F and 7-FN) in Real-Time can be smaller than the flowgate limit – Only the over-allocated entities/transactions are penalized for over- allocating Remaining of flowgate limit can be reassigned to over- allocated entities/transactions so that LTC equals the flowgate limit – Reduces the FTC bucket size – Distribution Proportion Options: FIRM limits of over-allocated entities/transactions Real-Time over-allocation impact Real-Time impacts Other – If TLR-5 cannot be resolved with curtailments from FTC bucket, may need to curtail pro-rata the LTC bucket Entities/Transaction that do not over-allocate may be curtailed (see next examples)

7 Option 2:Proportional Distribution of Under-Allocated Amounts to Over- Allocated GTL/PTP – Proportional to Firm Limit Under-allocation from: – Entity B PTP:10 MW – Entity D PTP:20 MW – Entity E GTL:10 MW – Total:40 MW Distribute under-allocation among over-allocating entities: – Entity A PTP:75 MW – Entity B GTL:80 MW – Entity D GTL:60 MW – Entity E PTP:25 MW – Total:240 MW Allocation Adjustment Ratio: (240+40)/240 = 1.17 Adjusted Firm Limit: – Entity A PTP:75 * 1.17 =87.8 MW – Entity B GTL:80 * 1.17 =93.6 MW – Entity D GTL:60 * 1.17 =70.2 MW – Entity E PTP:25 * 1.17 =29.3 MW – Total:240 MW

8 Option 2: Proportional Distribution of Under-Allocated Amounts to Over- Allocated GTL/PTP – Proportional to Firm Limit Adjustment factor of 1.17 applied to firm limits of over-allocated PTP/GTL (needs iterative process to use all under allocation amounts) TLR 5-a requires curtailment of 65MW of FIRM transactions after exhausting all NON- FIRM curtailments – All 56.9 MW of FTC (7-FC and 7-FCN) will be curtailed – 8.1 MW of the MW of LTC (7-F and 7-FN) will be curtailed pro-rata Total LTC is adjusted to equal total limit of the flowgate EntityGTL Firm Limit PTP Firm Limit RT Firm GTL Impact RT Firm PTP Impact Over (Under) Allocation Adj. GTL F-Limit Adj. PTP F-Limit FTCLTC A B B6050(10)500 C D D10080(20)800 E2010(10)100 E Total

9 Option 3:Proportional Distribution of Under-Allocated Amounts to Over- Allocated GTL/PTP – Proportional to Real-Time Over-Allocation Under-allocation from: – Entity B PTP:10 MW – Entity D PTP:20 MW – Entity E GTL:10 MW – Total:40 MW Distribute under-allocation among over-allocating entities: – Entity A PTP:5 MW – Entity B GTL:40 MW – Entity D GTL:40 MW – Entity E PTP:5 MW – Total:90 MW Allocation Adjustment Ratio: 40/90 = 0.44 Adjusted Firm Limit: – Entity A PTP:75 + 5*0.44 =77.2 MW – Entity B GTL: *0.44 =97.6 MW – Entity D GTL: *0.44 =77.6 MW – Entity E PTP:25 + 5*0.44 =27.2 MW – Total:279.6 MW

10 Option 3: Proportional Distribution of Under-Allocated Amounts to Over- Allocated GTL/PTP – Proportional to Real-Time Over Allocation Adjustment factor of 0.44 applied to over-allocated firm limits (no iterative process needed) TLR 5-a requires curtailment of 65MW of FIRM transactions after exhausting all NON- FIRM curtailments – All 50.4 MW of FTC (7-FC and 7-FCN) will be curtailed – 14.6 MW of the MW of LTC (7-F and 7-FN) will be curtailed pro-rata Total LTC is adjusted to equal total limit of the flowgate EntityGTL Firm Limit PTP Firm Limit RT Firm GTL Impact RT Firm PTP Impact Over (Under) Allocation Adj. GTL F-Limit Adj. PTP F-Limit FTCLTC A B B6050(10)500 C D D10080(20)800 E2010(10)100 E Total


Download ppt "Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google