2. Re-Considering Addiction Treatment How Can Treatment be More Accountable and Effective? Lessons from Mainstream Healthcare

3. What is Treatment? A 3-Stage Description Part 1

4. A Nice Simple Treatment Model NTOMS Sample of 250 Programs Treatment Substance Abusing Patient NON - Substance Abusing Patient

5. A Continuing Care Model Detox Substance Abusing Patient Continuing Care Recovering Patient Rehabilitation Duration Determined by Performance Criteria Duration Determined by Performance Criteria

6. Treatment Research Institute Stages of Treatment 1. Detoxification/Stabilization Purposes: Remove toxins Physical/Emotional Stabilization Promote Problem Recognition Engage patient into rehabilitation Setting – Hosp (80%), Res (10%), OPT (10%)

7. Treatment Research Institute Stages of Treatment 2. Rehabilitation Purposes: Sustain stable abstinence Teach self-management skills Identify & reduce threats to progress Engage in Continuing Care OPT (80%) Setting: Resid(10%) OPT (80%) MM(10%)

8. Treatment Research Institute Stages of Treatment 3. Aftercare-Continuing Care Purposes: Monitor & Support Abstinence Encourage Self-Monitoring Intervene Upon Threats to Relapse Types : AA, Pers. Ther., Opt Visits, Home Visits, Phone & Internet

9. Abstinence/Sobriety –Is it too much to ask? –Is it enough to ask? Lessons from Two Patients The SAMHSA Outcome Domains Part 2

10. Public Expectations of Substance Abuse Interventions Safe, complete detoxification Reduced use of medical services Eliminate crime Return to employment/self support Eliminate family disruption No return to drug use

11. Compared to What? –What would you do if you didn’t treat? –Lessons from comparisons Part 3

12. Treatment Comparisons a. No Treatment b. Role of Motivation c. Incarceration/Parole d. Other Chronic Illnesses

13. No Treatment Out of treatment groups a.

14. Treatment Research Institute Six Year HIV Infection Rates by Treatment Status at Time of Enrollment

15. Role of Motivation Pregnant Cocaine Users in Prenatal Care b.

16. UNMOTIVATED DRUG USERS Svikis et al. Johns Hopkins 146 Cocaine Abusing, Pregnant Women Seeking Pre-Natal Care - Not Treatment 100 Received - 1-Week Residential Tx. 46 Received - Standard Pre-Natal Care Costs and Complications of Delivery Un-Motivated Drug Users

17. Cocaine + Urine at Delivery 46 Control Women 63% 100 Treated Women *37%

18. Weight and Gestational Age 46 Control Women 2534 gms 34 wks 100 Treated Women *2939 gms *39 wks

19. NICU Stay and Costs 46 Control Women 39 days $46,700 100 Treated Women *7 days *$14,500

20. Summary - No Treatment 1. Treated patients show far more improvements than non-treated patients. 2. Motivation is an important but not critical ingredient. BUT Is Treatment better than Other Options?

21. Incarceration/Parole Why Bother – Just Incarcerate –Treatment During Incarceration –Treatment During Parole/Prob. c.

22. Re-Addiction Following Prison Vaillant 447 opiate addicts 91% Maddux & Desmond 594 opiate addicts 98% Nurco & Hanlon 355 opiate addicts 88% Hanlon & Nurco 237 mixed addicts 70% Many Other Studies Including: (Simpson, Wexler, Inciardi, Hubbard, Anglin) Treatment Research Institute

23. Summary - Incarceration Treatment can be added to incarceration Both the public safety and public health concerns can be addressed BUT even big “doses” of treatment in jails – don’t produce lasting change Only those in continuing care seem to show cost effectiveness of treatment

24. Other Illnesses Addiction Treatment Compared With Treatments for Other Illnesses

25. A Comparison With Three Chronic Medical Illnesses Hypertension Diabetes Asthma

26. Why These ? u No Doubt They Are Illnesses u All Chronic Conditions u Influenced by Genetic, Metabolic and Behavioral Factors u No Cures - But Effective Treatments Are Available

27. Hypertension : < 60% Diabetes < 50% Asthma< 30% Treatment Research Institute ADHERENCE Addiction 30 - 50%

28. Hypertension : 50 - 60% Diabetes 30 - 50% Asthma60 - 80% Treatment Research Institute RELAPSE Addiction 50 - 60%

29. Summary – Treatment “Efficacy” Efficacy is impact under carefully controlled conditions – what treatment CAN do. Most efficacy studies show that treatment CAN work – CAN meet public expectations So…

30. SO… Why Does Treatment Seem So Ineffective

31. The “Gap” Why the Gap Between What Treatment Can Do and What it Does?

32. Two Problems With Addiction Treatment Treatment Infrastructure: Infrastructure and Expectations Treatment Concepts: Acute vs. Continuing Care Model: Part 4

33. Problem 1 The National Treatment Infrastructure

34. Program Changes In 16 Months: 12% had closed 13% had changed service operation RESULT – 25% FEWER PROGRAMS 31% of the rest had been taken over, usually by MH agencies RESULT – STAFF CONFUSION Program Survey - 1

35. Counselor turnover is 50% per year 50-60% of Directors in job Less Than 1 year Program Survey - 2 STAFF TURNOVER!

36. Program Survey - 4 Other Staff : 54% Had no physician 34% Had P/T physician 39% Had a Nurse (part of full time) < 25% Had a SW or a Psychologist Major professional group - Counselors

37. Problem 2 How Do We Deliver and Evaluate Addiction Treatment ? What is the model ?

38. If many or most cases of addiction are really chronic then: 1) We may be evaluating the effectiveness of addiction treatments in the wrong way.

39. A Nice Simple Rehab Model NTOMS Sample of 250 Programs Treatment Substance Abusing Patient Non- Substance Abusing Patient Meds, Therapies, Services

40. Treatment Research Institute Outcome In Hypertension

41. Treatment Research Institute Outcome In Addiction

42. Lessons from Chronic Illness: 1.Medications relieve symptoms but…. behavioral change is necessary for sustained benefit

43. Lessons from Chronic Illness: 2. Treatment effects usually don’t last very long after care stops.

44. Lessons from Chronic Illness: 3. Patients who are not in some form of treatment or monitoring are at elevated risk for relapse.

45. Important Caveats Not Every Case of Substance Abuse Needs a Continuing Care Strategy –Not Clear When to Shift from Acute –Also Not Clear in Other Illnesses A Continuing Care Strategy Does Not Imply Lack of Responsibility –Just the Opposite –One Goal is Self-Management

46. Summary Addiction Treatment can be scientifically evaluated Abstinence is not enough – use SAMHSA domains Programs can and should be held accountable – during care Practical monitoring systems are operating in several states