1. California Planning Roundtable 2013 Retreat, Riverside, CA Presented by Nancy Pfeffer, Director of Regional Planning, Gateway Cities Council of Governments

3. GATEWAY CITIES RANKING AMONG LARGEST CITIES IN THE UNITED STATES (2010 CENSUS) 1.New York8,175,133 2.Los Angeles3,792,621 3.Chicago2,695,598 4.Houston2,100,263 5.Gateway Cities2,050,455 6.Philadelphia1,526,006 7.Phoenix1,445,632 8.San Antonio1,327,407 9.San Diego1,307,402 10.Dallas1,197,816 11.San Jose 945,942

4. Socioeconomic Characteristic GCCOGState Persons living in poverty16.4%13.7% Persons living in rental units 46.7%39.5% Renters living in overcrowded units 23.5%13.2% Persons age 18-64 with limited English 10%4.1%

14.  Transportation  Air Quality  Housing & Demographics  Economic Development

15.  Corridor Planning ◦ I-605/SR-91/I-405 ◦ I-710 ◦ I-5  Sustainable Communities Strategy  Air Quality Action Plan  Strategic Transportation Plan  Homelessness Initiative

16. 8% 4.46% 13% 16 Gateway Cities 2005 Benchmark 2020 2035 -5% -10% 0% 2.91% 1.10% 4.22% 7.07% 2.97% Transportation TDM Measures Land Use 0.72% Regional Projects Interactive Effects 8.51% 15.02% 0.04% Percent below 16.64 lbs CO 2e per person per day -15%

18. Cost and Funding of Local Implementation 100 Projects Require Funding between 2011 and 2035 $300 $150 $400 $350 $250 $371 Million $156 Million Cost of Local Projects Funding Need $0 $50 $100 $200

19.  Air Quality Action Plan ◦ Region-wide health risk assessment ◦ Dramatic improvements projected in air quality and related exposure  Strategic Transportation Plan ◦ $8+ million budget ◦ Regional transportation model ◦ Updated air quality analysis ◦ Active transportation element ◦ Technology application to goods movement ◦ Support for project funding for all local cities

20.  “Facilitate regional coordination between stakeholders on transportation projects within the Gateway Cities  Reward collaboration within the goods movement industry and promote the use of cutting-edge technologies  Identify local goal and achieve consensus on transportation infrastructure investments that will directly benefit the subregion’s economic development”

21. For Each Program/Project and Initiative  First: A Forum  Second: A Planner  Third: A Consensus Builder  Fourth: An Advocate