1. The Qualification Frameworks Pros et Contras Sigmund Grønmo University of Bergen SIU Seminar Gardermoen June 17, 2011

2. Internationalisation International demands Need for clear and tranparent information on the educational systems and a need to facilitate access and progression between compulsory education, vocational education and training, and higher education

3. The priority areas of the Bologna process (The Ministerial meeting in Prague in 2001) 9. Promotion of the attractiveness of the European Higher Education Area The readability and comparability of European higher education degrees worldwide should be enhanced by means of the common framework of qualifications… (factsheet, 2006) A strong policy mechanism! (OECD)

4. Qualification Frameworks in the context of the Bologna process Definitions Systematic description of educational levels using learning outcomes as level descriptors A level (a cycle) What a student should know and be able to demonstrate at the end of a learning period - id.est at the time when a study programme is successfully completed (exit level)

5. Target groups : Teachers Students Employers Authorities The society at home and abroad

6. Student-centred learning and the teaching mission of higher education. Leuven/Louvain-la- Neuve Communiqué, April 2009 We reassert the importance of the teaching mission of higher education institutions and the necessity for ongoing curricular reform geared toward the development of learning outcomes. Student - centred learning requires empowering individual learners, new approaches to teaching and learning, effective support and guidance structures and a curriculum focused more clearly on the learner in all three cycles. Curriculum reform will thus be an ongoing process leading to high quality, flexible and more individually tailored education paths. Academics, in close cooperation with student and employer representatives, will continue to develop learning outcomes and international reference points for a growing number of subject areas. We ask the higher education institutions to pay attention to improving the teaching quality of their study programmes at all levels. This should be a priority in the future implementation of the European Standards and Guidelines for quality assurance.

7. Teachers´s responsibilities The implemenation of a qualification framework requires the teachers to use, at both programme and module level, a new pedagogical approach to curriculum design with the purpose to enhance clarity and transparency of the studies. Not only the content of a degree or a study shall be described but also the learning outcomes. The learning outcomes should be supported by suitable teaching methods and assessment forms

8. Students Information source: what a student should know and be able to demonstrate at the time when the degree will be awarded what the student will be assessed on Awareness: of expected learning outcomes of achieved competences of employability

9. Employers and authorities Information on what can be expected from higher education candidates For quality assurance purposes For recognition purposes

10. And as an overarching goal The learning outcome-based approach should enhance the international mobility and employability

11. The benefits. A qualification framework should give consistent information on the system it is meant to describe (international framework, national framework, sectoral framework, institutional framework) to the society at large make the students aware of what they should be able to demonstrate at the end of a learning period focus on the universities´ teaching mission improve curriculum design: a common pedagogical approach to learning outcome-based education. Teaching and assement should be in line with the learning outcomes enhance flexibility and recognition: It may contribute in a positive way to the validation of non-formal and in-formal learning enhance employability

12. The goal of the new approach is to enhance higher education But it might sometimes be experienced as complicated and overwhelming teachers? Framework concepts may be used and interpreted in different ways

14. The ministerial meeting in Bergen in 2005 Three qualification frameworks!

15. 1. The overarching framework for qualifications “We adopt the overarching framework for qualifications in the European Higher Education Area,…” Extract from the ministerial communiqué from the Bergen meeting

16. 2. National Qualifications Frameworks “We commit ourselves to elaborating national frameworks for qualifications compatible with the overarching framework for qualifications in the EHEA…” Extract from the ministerial communiqué from the Bergen meeting

17. 3. The European Qualifications Framework for Lifelong learning (EU) ”We underline the importance of ensuring complementarity between the overarching framework for the EHEA and the proposal of a broader framework for qualifications for lifelong learning...” Extract from the ministerial communiqué from the Bergen meeting

18. Qualifications Framework for Higher Education European Higher Education Area (adopted in Bergen 2005) The European Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning (adopted in Brussels 2008) A common reference point The National Qualifications Framework Level references

19. National Qualifications Framework “A graduate with a completed qualification should have the following learning outcomes defined in terms of knowledge, skills and generic competence:…” National quality assurance requirements by national accreditation agencies Learning outcomes - the programme level The graduate is able to demonstrate:… Learning outcomes at different levels Learning outcomes at course level The student is able to demonstrate… Learning outcomes at course level The student is able to demonstrate… Learning outcomes at course level The student is able to demonstrate…

20. Questions National qualifications frameworks What is their status: Are they exclusively a source of information or should they be used normative or do they describe the required standards?

21. Questions National Qualifications Frameworks A qualification framework – does it describe well enough the different levels or is it a simplification of a complex educational picture?

22. Questions The concept of learning outcomes 1) The term learning outcomes How should it be understood? Used both as goals/objectives for intended/expected learning outcomes/results of a learning period and as achieved results. In Norway Phrasing/Wording Developed from ”intended learning outcomes” to statements describing what a holder of a qualification is able to do or demonstrate.

23. The concept of learning outcomes 2) Learning outcomes divided into competence fields: f.ex. knowledge, skills, generic competence It might be problematic to separate or categorise the competence fields because learning is a complex process with many interwoven and connected elements.

24. The learning outcomes concept 3) Do the learning outcomes give enough information about the qualifications? as information for potential students in a prosepectus as information for employers in diplomas and Diploma Supplement as a source for the quality assurance of the study programmes as recognition element for admission or recognition officers

25. The learning outcome concept 4) Learning outcomes and the different lenghts of studies The lenght of the study programme is different but the level descriptions are the same: Is this a problem? A degree of 180 ECTS compared with a degree of 240 ECTS. Are the real outcomes the same? The difference is approximately 1600 study related hours.

26. The key elements for successful use of qualification frameworks What should be further worked on: common understanding and practice of the QFs common understanding of the terminology used in the QFs common understanding of which QF is the common platform for joint degrees discussion and further development in the use of learning outcomes in assessment and quality assurance procedures. And to ensure alignment between teaching, assessment, and intentions as phrased discussion of the need for different wording concerning information on learning outcomes in brochures, on the web pages, curricula and in Diplomas and Diploma Supplements discussion of competence descriptions in terms of learning outcomes and validation of non-formal and informal learning

27. As a professor I would like to emphasize that the students´ learning has always been at the core of the universities´ activities, and that it can be approached in different ways. But it is crucial that the universities continuously reflect on how to enhance the students´ learning.

28. Research basis as the main quality For a research university the most important quality of the education is that it is research based The teachers are active in research Their time is divided equally between research and teaching Qualification frameworks should reflect this, thus being an additional basis for quality of the education

29. Even if..... we have experienced the implementation of the qualification framework, the new approach to curriculum design and the terminology sometimes as a mess...

30. ....it is, however, now doubt that the qualification framework concept - according to a fresh report from our university - has deepend the thinking and awareness of our programmes of study and that the implementation of the outcome-based approach to teaching and learning has improved curriculum design Besides, ”house cleaning” is often experienced as a necessary evil – but then again all´s well that ends well!

31. Thank you for your attention!