1. The role of European standards and guidelines for the development of the national system of independent assessment of the quality of higher education Seidakhmetova R. Director, Bologna and Academic Mobility center of Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan

2. Promotion of European cooperation in quality assurance with a view to developing comparable criteria and methodologies of the joint declaration of the European Ministers of Education : Brief History Bologna, June 19,1999

3. To develop an acceptable set of standards, procedures, methods of quality assessment, as well as an adequate system of external expertise for quality assurance or accreditation system agencies (agencies) The order of Ministers Berlin, September 19, 2003 for ENQA in cooperation with EUA, EURASHE and ESIB Brief History

4. To develop European standards for external and internal quality assurance and accreditation agencies Of Communiqué of the Conference of Ministers of Higher Education Berlin, September 19, 2003 Challenges in quality assurance : Brief History Oblige the European accreditation agencies every five years to pass their test activities Publish a European register of quality assurance agencies

5. The Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Higher Education in the European space 2005 Brief History increase the responsibility of universities in accordance with the expansion of the rights of institutional autonomy and independence outlines equal interest in the high quality of the higher education of all parties (students, employers, and society) orientation of the external quality assurance to mitigate the responsibility of universities to achieve their goals

6. Creating a full quality assurance system for formed under the Bologna Process EHEA Goal 2005 Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area – 2005, Helsinki. Foreword by the President of ENQA Christian Tyuna. Brief History The Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Higher Education in the European space

7. Of Bucharest Communique Bucharest, April 3, 2012 Revise ESG in order to improve it Ministerial Decision Brief History

8. Comply with the Bologna structure of higher education (three cycles) to comply with the European quality assurance framework of qualifications and the qualifications of the European Higher Education Area Give clear guidance regarding the Diploma Supplement and ECTS, since they do not fully apply in most countries Dublin, March 2013 General Assembly EQAR Accreditation agencies were recommended to : Brief History

9. Reflected in the quality standards in the European Higher Education priorities such as employment and mobility. Dublin, March 2013 General Assembly EQAR Brief History Accreditation agencies were recommended to :

10. Internal quality assurance standards could also take into account such key aspects as the quality of student services, career / vocational guidance for students and graduates, the development of the financial management capacity, etc. Dublin, March 2013 General Assembly EQAR Brief History Accreditation agencies were recommended to :

11. development (taking into account the expectations of universities: the maintenance of internal development) accountability (taking into account the interests of the politicians in the area of education: to obtain reliable information for policy and management decisions at the level of individual education systems) transparency (the interests of the general public: obtaining reliable information about individual educational programs or groups of programs for comparison) Common values ​​ and the principle of ESG Achim HOPBAKH, President of ENQA

12. Formation of a unified system of values ​​ and principles for assessing the quality of higher education in line with international standards he role of the ESG in the development and improvement of the national system for assessing the quality of higher education Creating a quality assurance tool of accreditation agencies and to ensure mutual trust between them Giving universities the choice of agencies on the basis of determining the usefulness and value of the results of the accreditation by the university, students, employers To promote the effective implementation of the basic parameters of the Bologna Process

13. increase transparency in quality assurance Priorities of the Kazakhstan accreditation system in the long term transition to the accreditation of educational institutions at all levels improving the quality of teaching and research

14. Priorities of the Kazakhstan accreditation system entering national accrediting agencies in EQAR full membership of the national accrediting agencies in the ENQA improvement of the quality assurance system in accordance with the standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the EHEA

15. The effects ESG strengthening the attractiveness of educational programs Kazakh universities improving the competitiveness of Kazakhstan universities integration into the European Higher Education Area

16. Thank you for attention!