Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Copyright Law – Ronald W. Staudt Class 4 September 10, 2013.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Copyright Law – Ronald W. Staudt Class 4 September 10, 2013."— Presentation transcript:

1 Copyright Law – Ronald W. Staudt Class 4 September 10, 2013

2 Plan for today zRecap of “Fixation” yDefinitions of copy, phonorecord, fixation yRAM fixation & questions on p. 93 ySect 1101- unauthorized fixation zIdea/Expression Dichotomy

3 Dish Told To Answer Fox's En Banc Request In DVR Row IP Law360 news-alt@law360.com Sept 4, 2013 Dish Network LLC was ordered by the Ninth Circuit on Friday to reply to Fox Broadcasting Co. Inc.'s petition for an en banc review of a ruling that Dish's Hopper service likely does not infringe the TV network’s copyrights.

4 Photog Takes Prince Fair Use Ruling To Supreme Court IP Law360 news-alt@law360.com Sept 4, 2013 Photographer Patrick Cariou asked the U.S. Supreme Court last week to overturn a ruling that artist Richard prince was mostly protected by the fair use doctrine when he used Cariou’s images, arguing the decision relied too heavily on the subjective artistic tastes of the judges involved.

5 Copies & Phonorecords ''Copies'' are material objects, other than phonorecords, in which a work is fixed by any method now known or later developed, and from which the work can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated, either directly or with the aid of a machine or device. The term ''copies'' includes the material object, other than a phonorecord, in which the work is first fixed. z''Phonorecords'' are material objects in which sounds, other than those accompanying a motion picture or other audiovisual work, are fixed by any method now known or later developed, and from which the sounds can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated, either directly or with the aid of a machine or device. The term ''phonorecords'' includes the material object in which the sounds are first fixed.

6 Fixed zA work is ''fixed'' in a tangible medium of expression when its embodiment in a copy or phonorecord, by or under the authority of the author, is sufficiently permanent or stable to permit it to be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated for a period of more than transitory duration. A work consisting of sounds, images, or both, that are being transmitted, is ''fixed'' for purposes of this title if a fixation of the work is being made simultaneously with its transmission.

7 Sec. 1101. Unauthorized fixation and trafficking in sound recordings and music videos (a) Unauthorized Acts. - Anyone who, without the consent of the performer or performers involved - (1) fixes the sounds or sounds and images of a live musical performance in a copy or phonorecord, or reproduces copies or phonorecords of such a performance from an unauthorized fixation, (2) transmits or otherwise communicates to the public the sounds or sounds and images of a live musical performance, or (3) distributes or offers to distribute, sells or offers to sell, rents or offers to rent, or traffics in any copy or phonorecord fixed as described in paragraph (1), regardless of whether the fixations occurred in the United States, shall be subject to the remedies provided in sections 502 through 505, to the same extent as an infringer of copyright.502

8 Is 1101 Constitutional? zMoghadam and KISS Catalog and Martignon–Congress has power under the Commerce Clause to protect “unfixed” works. yKISS’s earlier, now withdrawn opinion, and Martignon below, now overruled, to the contrary.

9 Idea/Expression Dichotomy 102(b) In no case does copyright protection for an original work of authorship extend to any idea, procedure, process, system, method of operation, concept, principle, or discovery, regardless of the form in which it is described, explained, illustrated, or embodied in such work.

10 Idea/Expression Dichotomy zBaker v. Selden yFacts yP’s claim and proof at trial yExplain v. use yMerger x“And where the art it teaches cannot be used without employing the methods and diagrams used to illustrate the book…such methods and diagrams are to be considered as necessary incidents to the art and given therewith to the public; not given for the purpose of publication in other works explanatory of the art, but for the purpose of practical application.”

11 Idea/Expression Dichotomy zBaker v. Selden yHolding? “The description of the art in a book, though entitled to the benefit of copyright, lays no foundation for an exclusive claim to the art itself.” “The copyright of a book on bookkeeping cannot secure the exclusive right to make, sell and use account books prepared upon the plan set forth in such book.” “Blank account books are not the subject of copyright…”

12 Idea/Expression Dichotomy SMS v. ASP (1 st Cir. 2009) Description of process (office comm. manual) can be expressive, even if pedantic. Possibly in. Morrissey v. Procter & Gamble Thin v. Merger Continental Casualty Legal form thin Publications International v. Meredith Recipes without expressive elaboration out Bibbero Systems & Utopia Provider Systems —forms must communicate information, not collect information based on CFR Title 37, Sect. 202.1 which omits “blank forms…designed for recording information and do not in themselves convey information.” CFR Title 37, Sect. 202.1

13 Blank Form Cases Baker v. Selden Account books out Morrissey Contest rules out Continental Casualty Legal form thin Bibbero Systems Superbill out Utopia Provider Systems Medical examination forms out


Download ppt "Copyright Law – Ronald W. Staudt Class 4 September 10, 2013."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google