Presentation on theme: "Universidad del Sagrado Corazón"— Presentation transcript:
1Universidad del Sagrado Corazón Workshop for Team Chairs and Evaluators Expectations & Accountability in AccreditationJosé Jaime Rivera, Ph.D.PresidentUniversidad del Sagrado CorazónSan Juan, Puerto RicoMSCHE CommissionerOctober 4, 2011
2Workshop GoalsThis workshop is designed to prepare you to be an effective member of a Middle States evaluation team that recommends appropriate, consistent, rigorous, and defensible accreditation actions to the Middle States Commission on Higher Education.These actions are guided by Standards.
3Characteristics of Excellence, 2006 What guided the development of these standards? 1. "First, these standards place an emphasis on institutional assessment and assessment of student learning.” [page v.]To emphasize assessment as the tool for improvement.2. “Second, the standards acknowledge the diversity of educational delivery systems that enable institutions to meet accreditation standards.” [page v.]To recognize and support diversity.3. “. . . the standards are clearly defined and illustrated, . . .” [page v.]To provide transparency to the process.
4Characteristics of Excellence Emphasis on assessment ". . . the Commission is aware of the institutional effort and cultural change that the relative emphasis on assessment may require.” [page v.]We must understand the key role that the self-study process and the team visit can have to accelerate/recognize that cultural change.The consequences of a continued postponement of comprehensive, quantitative and qualitative metrics in the assessment of higher education legitimizes and justifies outside intervention in the determination of these metrics.
5MSCHE Context". . . a professional association devoted to educational improvement through accreditation.” “Accreditation is the means of self-regulation and peer review intended to strengthen and sustain quality and integrity in higher education, making it worthy of public confidence and minimizing the scope of external control.” [emphasis added] “MSA’s accreditation is an expression of confidence in an institution’s mission and goals, its performance, and its resources.” [iv.]
6National ContextIncreasing attention paid to higher education and accreditation; rising questions about their valueConcerns about rising costs and spending for Federal student aid, together with “low” graduation ratesMisunderstanding about the role of the “peer” in the peer review processOccasional calls for “one-size-fits-all” metrics that do not respect unique missions [NCLB…]
7What does CHE expect of Teams & Chairs? Respect for the Mission/uniqueness of host institutionRecognition of achievementsCollegial analysis and Integrity of peer review processExpertise and PreparationTeam reports based firmly on Middle States Standards and supported by evidenceAvoid prescriptive pronouncementsCompassionate Rigor
8What can you expect from the Commission? Team reports are read carefully and help MSCHE at the next levels of reviewCommittee on Evaluation ReportsCommission MeetingsCommittee and Commission members [with your support] work to ensure consistent application of Standards across institutionsMSCHE will inform the institution of the final Commission action on reaccreditation