1. South East Asia - Optimising Reproductive & Child Health Outcomes in Developing Countries SEA-ORCHID Project Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, University of Sydney Khon Kaen University, Thailand Australasian Cochrane Centre, Monash University University of Philippines, Manila Women’s & Children’s Hospital, University of Adelaide Royal College of Medicine Perak, Ipoh, Malaysia Gajdah Mada University, Jogjakarta, Indonesia

3. Broad scientific question Can the health of mothers and babies in Thailand, Indonesia, the Philippines and Malaysia be improved by: increasing the capacity for research synthesis; improving the implementation of effective interventions; and identifying gaps in knowledge needing further research?

4. Aims Designed to answer the following questions: 1. What is the current teaching and practice related to pregnancy and childbirth in SE Asia? 2. What are the local barriers to the use of research in SE Asia and how can they be overcome? 3. Will a targeted intervention to build capacity for the generation, evaluation and implementation of relevant evidence lead to improved research output, research implementation and health outcomes?

5. Rationale access to reliable health information for workers in developing countries is potentially the single most cost effective and achievable strategy for sustainable improvement in health care changing behaviour of health workers is a complex process requiring a multi-dimensional approach that is flexible, participatory and relevant builds on the Collaboration’s experience and existing networks

6. Methods Pre-intervention phase (2004-05) establishment of SE Asian nodes baseline data collection Intervention phase (2005-07) educating practitioners in evidence-based practice supporting the preparation of systematic reviews and the development of guidelines promoting effective dissemination and identifying research priorities academic exchange through fellowships and AUS-based Educator study tours Outcome & reporting phase (2007-08) reassessment of the practice and outcomes measured in phase one ongoing dissemination of results

7. Methodology Interrupted time series Multi-dimensional educational intervention Quantitative and qualitative evaluation Action research

8. Project design Pre-intervention phase (2004-05) Baseline collection of primary & secondary outcomes

9. Primary outcomes 20 areas of current practice 10 health outcomes of mothers & babies at least 1000 women admitted over 9-month period at each site (~9000 women) To help answer… were best practice recommendations applied? what are the impact of these practices on the health of mothers and babies?

10. Primary outcomes - recommended practices being measured magnesium sulphate for eclampsia and pre-eclampsia use of corticosteroids prior to pre-term birth continuous support for women in labour selective use of episiotomy active management for the third stage of labour vacuum rather than forceps for operative delivery intra-operative antibiotics at time of caesarean section

11. Secondary outcomes - evidence-based practice & policy number and quality of guidelines in clinical practice level of research activity EBM in curriculum knowledge of evidence-based practice level of involvement in Cochrane activities Qualitative data collection analysis of barriers to practice change, including identification of locally specific barriers to use of clinical practices focus groups to identify knowledge, beliefs and attitudes about EBP

12. Progress to date: primary outcomes nine tertiary, regional and provincial hospitals selected web-based baseline data collection began March 2005 8,500 births recorded (completion of baseline data by end November)

13. Secondary outcomes and project milestones developed tools to measure secondary outcomes recruitment of three Australian-based clinical educators survey of practitioners’ knowledge of EBP recruitment of SEA-based educators and Australian study tour (Oct/Nov 2005) planning of the educational intervention program logical framework linklink

14. Project design Post-intervention phase: measuring primary & secondary outcomes Pre-intervention phase: measuring primary & secondary outcomes Intervention phase (2005-07): training practitioners in evidence-based practice supporting the preparation of systematic reviews and guidelines promoting effective dissemination identifying research priorities

15. Planned training activities Generators of evidence & evidence-based materials: systematic reviewers & guideline developers Critical appraisal of evidence, systematic reviewing, guideline development Users of evidence: clinicians & policymakers Use of Cochrane Library & Reproductive Health Library Implementation & use of guidelines Accessing & interpreting evidence Educators about evidence: teachers & trainers Provide material & training on principals of evidence-based practice

16. Educational interventions communicate aims, objectives, methods and evaluation actively involve learners in planning, delivery and evaluation of the program be experiential and problem-based be perceived by learners as directly relevant to their professional roles explicitly recognise and tackle barriers to learning involve cycles of action and reflection build mutual trust, respect and collaborative relationships consider a range of qualitative and quantitative outcomes

17. Evaluation of interventions knowledge and skill development measured through clinical and educative practice changes learning processes assessed through reflective diary summaries and focus groups

18. Expected outcomes positive impact on health of mothers & babies establishment of network of researchers & clinicians ongoing development of evidence-based practice & policy capacity building…

19. Capacity building train clinicians to find, interpret and implement evidence ensure locally relevant evidence available & accessible identify important questions for future local research base policy decisions on research findings develop and implement local clinical practice guidelines

20. We know what want to achieve and we know the sort of activities that will help get us there But at a practical level, with one fte educator, what are we actually going to do? Our biggest challenge

21. www.seaorchid.org