9/15/20151 Sermons From Science -- April 2013 科学布道 -- 2013 年 4 月 Sermons from Science is now published in both YouTube under the name “Pastor Chui” and.

9/15/20151 Sermons From Science -- April 2013 科学布道 -- 2013 年 4 月 Sermons from Science is now published in both YouTube under the name “Pastor Chui” and also in PowerPoint slides in the website http://ChristCenterGospel.org. The contents of this presentation were taken from Dave Coppedge’s website http://crev.info. May God have all the glory. Let us pray for Dave Coppedge’s fast recovery from cancer surgery. Pastor Chui http://ChristCenterGospel.org ckchui1@yahoo.com

9/15/20152 More Reasons to Exercise and Plant a Garden 更多运动的原因和种花园 Three new studies show more benefits to exercise and home-grown food. The Endocrine Society has compared active and sedentary children in stressful situations. The sedentary children had elevated levels of cortisol, a stress indicator, when put into the same stressful experiences as active children. Even though the interactions are not well understood, the researchers feel “These results suggest exercise promotes mental health by regulating the stress hormone response to stressors.”Endocrine Society

9/15/20153 More Reasons to Exercise and Plant a Garden 更多运动的原因和种花 The British Journal of Sports Medicine published results of multiple studies that correlated exercise with self- control. The correlation held not only for pre-adolescent children, but for adolescents and young adults. “This is particularly important for children and teens, because well developed higher brain functions are important for academic achievement and other aspect of daily life, say the authors.”British Journal of Sports Medicine

9/15/20154 More Reasons to Exercise and Plant a Garden 更多运动的原因和种花 Schools that encourage children to grow “kitchen gardens” at home are getting an A+, according to a press release from Elsevier. Kids who watch their seeds develop at home are more likely to try new foods—healthier foods. The study reported a noticeable improvement in the nutritional level of school lunches from kids who participated.press release from Elsevier

9/15/20155 More Reasons to Exercise and Plant a Garden 更多运动的原因和种花 These studies are healthful and encouraging. The more we can encourage people to get off the sofa and out into the world, to learn more about the value of fresh fruits and vegetables and exercise, the better we will all be – physically, mentally, and to some extent, even morally.

9/15/20156 Gloria Deo 愿荣耀归上帝

9/15/20158 Arctic Camel Found 北极发现有骆驼 Fossils from a large species of camel living in Canada’s high arctic contain soft tissue. What’s an iconic desert creature doing in the freezing wastes of the north? The BBC News reported the discovery of 30 fragments of camel leg bones found on Ellesmere Island. Some of them had collagen, even though dated in the evolutionary scheme at 3.5 million years old. Evolutionists date the earliest camels at 45 million years old, but were astonished to find specimens this far north.BBC News

9/15/20159 Arctic Camel Found 北极发现有骆驼 The ancient camels would have had to cope with long and harsh winters, with temperatures plunging well below freezing. There would have been snow storms and months of perpetual darkness.

9/15/201510 Arctic Camel Found 北极发现有骆驼 The camels appear to have been 30% larger than modern camels. The article says they probably had shaggier coats. Their splayed feet, researchers surmise, would have been just as adapted to walk on snow as on sand, and their large eyes just as useful for arctic low-light conditions as for modern desert habitats. Researchers claimed the collagen shows the fossil camel was a “direct ancestor of modern camels.” Mike Buckley (U of Manchester) said the fragments provide “new insight into the evolution of this animal.”

9/15/201511 Arctic Camel Found 北极发现有骆驼 If this is evolution, it’s backwards. The fossil camels were larger and more adaptive to more habitats. Nothing was stated about half-camels. Did they just “appear” on the scene fully evolved? This is another example not of Darwinian progress, but modern impoverishment from a richer, more diverse biosphere in the past. Ignore the millions-of-years dates; they’re plot elements of the Darwinian story, not facts of nature.

9/15/201514 Gold, Earthquakes, and Time 黄金，地震和时间 How long does it take to form veins of gold in the rock? (a) millions of years; (b) less than a second. If you guessed (b), you overestimated. It might just be a few tenths of a second. So reported Richard A. Lovett in Nature News about a new study in Nature Geoscience on the relationship between heat, pressure, precipitation, and earthquakes.Nature NewsNature Geoscience Scientists have long known that veins of gold are formed by mineral deposition from hot fluids flowing through cracks deep in Earth’s crust. But a study published today in Nature Geoscience has found that the process can occur almost instantaneously — possibly within a few tenths of a second.

9/15/201515 Gold, Earthquakes, and Time 黄金，地震和时间 The process takes place along ‘fault jogs’ — sideways zigzag cracks that connect the main fault lines in rock, says first author Dion Weatherley, a seismologist at the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia. The idea is that hot fluid flashes into vapor in the fault jogs during earthquakes, causing nearly instant precipitation of the fluids within them under rapid depressurization. This is called “flash vaporization.” Small earthquakes appear to be more efficient at gold vein formation than large ones. A slip of merely 130 micrometers in a 90-centimeter fault zone can result in a 50% pressure drop, allowing the rapid precipitation of gold and quartz.

9/15/201516 Gold, Earthquakes, and Time 黄金，地震和时间 The caption in a photo of a gold vein accompanying the article says, “Veins of gold, such as this one trapped in quartz and granite, may deposit when the high-pressure water in which they were dissolved suddenly vaporises during an earthquake.” Lovett still promoted the idea that large veins of gold might take hundreds of thousands of years to form out of the “tiny” veins hypothesized in the study.

9/15/201517 Gold, Earthquakes, and Time 黄金，地震和时间 That, Weatherley adds, might be one of the reasons that the rocks in gold-bearing quartz deposits are often marbled with a spider web of tiny gold veins. “You [can] have thousands to hundreds of thousands of small earthquakes per year in a single fault system,” he says. “Over the course of hundreds of thousands of years, you have the potential to precipitate very large quantities of gold. Small bits add up.”

9/15/201518 Gold, Earthquakes, and Time 黄金，地震和时间 Nevertheless, it’s still a “flash in the pan” to use Lovett’s clever double metaphor. Given that so many small earthquakes can occur in a few years, it would seem hundreds of thousands of years are not necessary to find gold in them. The authors of the original paper said, “Multiple earthquakes progressively build economic-grade gold deposits.” See also the 10/15/2006 entry, “Gold Can Form in a Geological Instant.”10/15/2006

9/15/201519 Gold, Earthquakes, and Time 黄金，地震和时间 It takes a lot of findings like this to overcome the programming many students receive in school that everything on earth takes millions of years. Darwin was enamored with the idea of slow and gradual processes accumulating large changes over time. That, however, is a worldview preference, not a fact of nature.

9/15/201522 OOLishness: The Imaginary World of Origin-of-Life Studies 生命起源想象的世界的研究 Why aren’t philosophers of science shaming origin-of-life researchers out of the science department? OOL theories depend on imagination, not empirical evidence, for their broad-brush conclusions.

9/15/201523 OOLishness: The Imaginary World of Origin-of-Life Studies 生命起源想象的世界的研究 Astrobiology Magazine promised “New Insights into the Origin of Life” but delivered only imaginary inferences. Astrobiology Magazine Researchers studied living archaea, assuming them to be ancient, then used “could” and “may have” to conclude that DNA came late in the evolution of cells. But then the article mentioned 526 genes essential to life in a simple archaeal cell, and 121 essential proteins the scientists knew nothing about (see online book for the probability of getting even one gene by chance). Added to that, one of the OOL researchers admitted that DNA without all its complex machinery is useless. “DNA by itself is a rock,” he said. “You need all these other systems to make the DNA become a living cell.” He provided zero evidence that those systems could have arisen from a primordial soup.online book

9/15/201524 OOLishness: The Imaginary World of Origin-of-Life Studies 生命起源想象的世界的研究 Another entry in Astrobiology Magazine promised “Evidence that Comets Could Have Seeded Life on Earth” (the word could being the tip-off for imagination). But the reader will not find the word evidence in the body of the article–only talk of a simulation in contrived lab conditions. Even so, the Berkeley team manufactured nine amino acids and a couple of dipeptides at best, not specifying if the amino acids were used by living cells or were one-handed (see online book). Amino acids by themselves are as far from life as individual letters are from a sophisticated book.Astrobiology Magazineonline book

9/15/201525 OOLishness: The Imaginary World of Origin-of-Life Studies 生命起源想象的世界的研究 A third Astrobiology Magazine article asks, “How Did Primordial Cells Evolve?” (not “did” primordial cells evolve). This article used could 7 times and may have 3 times, with a smattering of other escape words like possible or plausible. The guts of the story, about whether bacteria can switch between walled and unwalled states, was the least of the worries facing the researchers’ imaginary thesis.Astrobiology Magazine

9/15/201526 OOLishness: The Imaginary World of Origin-of-Life Studies 生命起源想象的世界的研究 Science Daily teased its readers with the headline, “Untangling Life’s Origins,” confessing a tangled mess exists or has existed till now. The untangling operation, though, required postulating a “protein big bang” at the beginning. The researchers, additionally, used bioinformatics (an intelligent design method) to infer how proteins might have evolved. One researcher confessed, “The complexities of the biological functions of molecules are still poorly understood.” Maybe they should focus on understanding function before speculating about origin. Science Daily

9/15/201527 OOLishness: The Imaginary World of Origin-of-Life Studies 生命起源想象的世界的研究 Could is the first word in a Space.com article, “Could Life Have Evolved on Mars Before Earth?” The imagination is sent whirring with such suggestions. As for evidence, all that was proposed was some prior wetness in a certain crater on Mars where the Curiosity rover happens to be digging. No signs of Martian microbes were presented. Speaking of a “tantalizing possibility that life may have evolved on the Red Planet before it took root on Earth,” this article again used its suggestion wand: “New observations by NASA’s Curiosity rover suggest that microbial life could have survived on Mars in the distant past.”Space.comsuggestions

9/15/201528 OOLishness: The Imaginary World of Origin-of-Life Studies 生命起源想象的世界的研究 A story on PhysOrg borders on divination with test tubes acting as crystal balls. Many of us remember from chemistry class the mineral “gardens” one can make by pouring certain solutions into a test tube of liquid. The original source article at Chemical and Engineering News now claims that these non-living, abiotic structures “could hold the key to understanding the origins of life on Earth.” An editor of C&EN advocates “using them as “inspiration for origin-of-life research at hydrothermal vents.” Why? Because “Some scientists regard hydrothermal vents as places where life may first have originated on Earth.” Maybe staring at the minerals long enough will bring forth the desired visions.PhysOrgChemical and Engineering News

9/15/201529 OOLishness: The Imaginary World of Origin-of-Life Studies 生命起源想象的世界的研究 If you are still dazzled by the “tantalizing possibilities” told in these kinds of articles, you must get over it! Deprogram yourself. Stop being duped. Science is supposed to deal with objective reality—that which can be observed, repeated, and demonstrated. All the “possibility thinking” you see (may have, could have, might have possibly, probably, likely, sheds light, insight) has to be jettisoned. It’s not science till it’s demonstrated. Yet how can one possibly demonstrate the origin of life? OOL divination practitioners need to invoke bizarre, unobserved conditions in some mythical “distant past” where processes that could never happen in today’s world “could have” happened. This is pure wizardry, shamanism, shame. Its fOOLishness built on the foundation of sand that evolution cannot be questioned. Do not be deceived. Be angry that such fluff passes for science these days.

9/15/201530 OOLishness: The Imaginary World of Origin-of-Life Studies 生命起源想象的世界的研究 Astrobiology Magazine is one of the most useless, stupid boondoggles in the federal government. It merely regurgitates press releases from other sources with “possibility thinking,” putting out garbage like this day after day with your tax dollars. Don’t forget that NASA’s Astrobiology Institute began in the 1990s with the hype over alleged microorganisms in a Martian meteorite, a claim soundly debunked in the years since. Like other useless federal programs, this one is hard to dismantle, but should have been first on the chopping block with the government as broke as it is. Astrobiology is a sham, with no evidence to validate its existence. Let the astrobiologists turn in their junk badges and go get a real job that can actually do something useful to help their fellow humans, like finding a cure for cancer.

9/15/201533 Scientific Organizations Promote Leftist Social Causes 科学组织促进左派的社会 What on earth does a science journal have to do with abortion or gay marriage? Some editors and reporters are actively pushing for social revolution. In “A Pope for Today,” Nature’s editors hoped that newly-instated Pope Francis would push social causes near and dear to their own Darwin- worshiping leftist hearts. The editors spoke of “the backwards unscientific belief in creationism of many US evangelicals and lawmakers” (undoubtedly including any Darwin doubters in that category), hoping Pope Francis would not be one of those.Nature

9/15/201534 Scientific Organizations Promote Leftist Social Causes 科学组织促进左派的社会 “Moreover, recent popes have substantially increased efforts to engage in dialogue with scientists on a host of issues, from embryonic stem-cell research and genetically modified crops to in vitro fertilization, abortion and euthanasia — and in the future will no doubt increasingly do so on advances in neuroscience and genetics, including prenatal screening. Scientists who have taken part in such discussions tell of thought-provoking and constructive debates, with the Church being open to ideas and often changing doctrines as a result. A damaging exception is its long-held opposition to the use of condoms to prevent the spread of HIV, and it can only be hoped that Pope Francis will have a more enlightened approach.”

9/15/201535 Scientific Organizations Promote Leftist Social Causes 科学组织促进左派的社会 It is hard to imagine any legitimate philosophy of science that would insert “science” into abortion, euthanasia, or prenatal screening. Such positions presuppose a backdrop of support for eugenics. Embryonic stem cell research cannot evade serious ethical questions, and the editors know it. Why did Nature classify all these things with Darwinism as “enlightened” while “creationism” is called “backward”? (see loaded words). If Nature were being truly scientific, it would seek balance on such hot topics or avoid them altogether as political matters for the domain of ethicists and theologians.loaded words

9/15/201536 Scientific Organizations Promote Leftist Social Causes 科学组织促进左派的社会 At Live Science, Stephanie Pappas is on a crusade to promote gay marriage. One of her pieces, “How Straight People Paved the Way for Gay Marriage,” tried to blame straight people for the apparent rise in support (depending on polls used) for homosexual “marriage”. An even more egregious advocacy piece she wrote for Live Science is called “5 Scientific Reasons Gay Parents Are Awesome.” There, Pappas tried to promote the idea that homosexuals are better parents than traditional moms and dads. In these articles, Pappas put no fingers in the dikes to distinguish her preferences from those who would use the same arguments to support polygamy and other social experiments. By rubberstamping her advocacy pieces, Live Science has endorsed her crusade.Live Science

9/15/201537 Scientific Organizations Promote Leftist Social Causes 科学组织促进左派的社会 Without controversy, Pappas has the right to advocate her own views; she could, for instance, start a personal blog. What is troubling is that she attached the honorable name of “science” to her far-left social agenda, pushing a view repudiated by Catholics, evangelicals, Jews, and many non-religious heterosexuals. Never in the history of the world has a civilization promoted homosexual pairing to be a form of “marriage” on par with mother, father and children. Never have societies tried to redefine marriage to include other social experiments. Yet some “scientific” organizations like Nature and Live Science presume to create new social orders based on their self-proclaimed “enlightened” views – views informed by Darwinism and characteristic of other far-left organizations.

9/15/201538 Scientific Organizations Promote Leftist Social Causes 科学组织促进左派的社会 Attention! We must view secular science as a special-interest group, NOT a movement that seeks the truth about the natural world. What! Promoting euthanasia in the name of science? Homosexual “marriage” in the name of science? Abortion in the name of science? Wake up, people! We are back to the early 20th century, when progressives who loved Darwin promoted eugenics. Many unspeakable horrors followed. Don’t think our age will not escape the consequences of this kind of thinking.

9/15/201539 Scientific Organizations Promote Leftist Social Causes 科学组织促进左派的社会 You will notice that Nature and Live Science act like blind elitists. They are all for “religious” people changing their doctrines. They have no conscience telling them they need to change their own doctrines. Secular science is just as “religious” as anyone; it has an origin story, a purpose story, ideals, and visions. It uses divination and dreams. Its shamans hold sway over their subjects, using all the tools of propaganda.

9/15/201540 Scientific Organizations Promote Leftist Social Causes 科学组织促进左派的社会 When secular science organizations stick to observable, repeatable facts about the natural world, that’s fine; when they promote leftist causes, they need to be opposed with the same vigor as one would fight political revolutionaries, because that’s what they are.

9/15/201543 Evolution Is Not Just Change or Similarity 进化不只是改变或相似性 Many scientific findings get labeled with “evolution” even though neo-Darwinism has nothing to do with them. Reversible evolution: A study on dust mites reported by Science Daily claims evolution can run backwards to previous states – a violation of an evolutionary principle called Dollo’s Law. For one, the supposed phylogenetic analysis began and ended with dust mites, not with one kind of creature turning into another. For another, a violation of Dollo’s Law (“evolution is unidirectional and irreversible”) amounts to a falsification of neo-Darwinism, not a confirmation of it.Science Daily

9/15/201544 Evolution Is Not Just Change or Similarity 进化不只是改变或相似性 Predictable evolution: An article on PhysOrg and another on Science Daily claim long-term evolution is “surprisingly predictable,” contrary to a key tenet of neo- Darwinism that evolution is aimless and purposeless. The first study involved just a computer model of a particular protein connection, irrelevant to evolution anyway. The second began and ended with E. coli (one species), of doubtful relevance to the issue of Darwinian “origin of species.”PhysOrgScience Daily

9/15/201545 Evolution Is Not Just Change or Similarity 进化不只是改变或相似性 Gambler evolution: Can studies of living gamblers provide any insight into human evolution? Science Daily thought so (“It’s in the Cards: Human Evolution Influences Gamblers’ Decisions”), but the big question left begging is whether humans’ ability to make “rational decisions” is a product of neo-Darwinism. If they think so, they have refuted their own thesis: the scientists’ own decision to study rationality is undermined by an aimless, purposeless process, leading a critic to question whether their own rationality is rational.Science Dailyrefuted their own thesis

9/15/201546 Evolution Is Not Just Change or Similarity 进化不只是改变或相似性 Swallow evolution: Several science sites, like Nature News, toyed with the idea that swallows are evolving to dodge traffic. This is based on findings that fewer swallows are winding up as roadkill. This again, though, even if the statistics are legitimate, does nothing to confirm neo-Darwinism. It does not find that a mutation has created an innovation. It might just mean that the clumsiest birds have already died. The remainder are all still members of the same species.Nature News

9/15/201547 Evolution Is Not Just Change or Similarity 进化不只是改变或相似性 Cicada evolution: An open-access paper on PNAS struggled to understand the evolutionary dynamics of periodic cicadas. Often, those with 13-year cycles coexist with others on 17-year cycles. That fact alone refutes the neo-Darwinian position that fitter species displace others. Moreover, they’re all cicadas, members of the same genus Magicicada. Even strict creationists allow for that amount of variation within created kinds. The ending part of the paper’s Discussion section included a mixture of hubris and humility: “Our results support the idea that life cycle plasticity has been a creative force in the evolution of Magicicada,” they said. “However, the regulatory system of Magicicada life cycles and the mechanism of putative life cycle shift are completely unknown and require future comparative genomic studies of 13– and 17-y periodical cicadas.” What, exactly, was known?open-access paper on PNAS

9/15/201548 Evolution Is Not Just Change or Similarity 进化不只是改变或相似性 Survival of the fattest: An article on Science Daily about polar bears appears to be about evolution, but really is just about challenges polar bears face with sea ice changes. Any reporter touting “survival of the fattest,” needless to say, is stretching the idea of “fitness” far astray from what Darwin envisioned.Science Daily

9/15/201549 Evolution Is Not Just Change or Similarity 进化不只是改变或相似性 From frog to Beatle: Any connection between the little hairs on frog toes and human locks of hair seems a stretch. Nature News, though, claimed that there’s an evolutionary relationship: “Frog feet share human hair origin.” Surely they did not mean to imply that frog hair evolved from Beatle moptops. Because of similarity in the genes for keratin between the distant species, researchers advanced this leap of faith: “The authors say that these proteins must have arisen in an early tetrapod ancestor before diverging to become hair in mammals and toe pads in frogs.” Exactly how a suite of complex proteins “arose” was left unexplained.Nature News

9/15/201550 Evolution Is Not Just Change or Similarity 进化不只是改变或相似性 In each of these crazy articles, evolution was assumed, not demonstrated. “Evolution” has become such a flexible term, it means nothing any more. Darwin tried to link progress from molecules to man to a mechanism that produced innovation without a designer, but where is it? These stories are all nonsensical in that context. Whatever is observed, evolved. Whatever exists, emerged. That’s the new rule, no matter how contrary to expectations, no matter how trivial the change, no matter how illogical. Even strong evidence for design is twisted into supposed evidence for evolution. Evolutionists have succeeded in committing the perfect crime, the ultimate scam. It’s time to unmask these charlatans. Send them back to basics. They have completely lost their way as to what science is and what it’s supposed to be. Sadly, their way is leading millions astray. They need a healthy dose of shame.

9/15/201553 The Trouble with Zircons 锆石的困境 Geologists’ favorite tool for dating rocks at millions and billions of years old has revealed problems with interpretation. Zircons are hard minerals that can contain uranium. To secular geologists, they act like ideal time capsules, sealed from outside influences. They are used frequently to date deposits with a claimed high precision, but is it possible to trust them too much?

9/15/201554 The Trouble with Zircons 锆石的困境 The abstract of a paper in Geology by American scientists claims that detrital zircons show “no drainage link between southern California rivers and the Colorado Plateau from mid- Cretaceous through Pliocene.” The zircons told a tale at odds with views that the Grand Canyon began cutting hundreds of millions of years ago.Geology “Although Paleogene headwaters of southern California rivers extended into the eastern Mojave Desert, Sonoran Desert, and Mogollon Highlands, our results indicate that these headwaters did not extend as far as the Colorado Plateau. This conclusion conflicts with the hypothesis of a Paleogene southwest- flowing Arizona River, but supports late Miocene–Pliocene drainage reorganization and integration of the Colorado River coincident with development of the Salton Trough and Gulf of California.”

9/15/201555 The Trouble with Zircons 锆石的困境 The canyon is young, in other words. The interpretation, however, required reversing the assumed amount of slippage along the San Andreas Fault and deciding which zircons had been locally recycled.

9/15/201556 The Trouble with Zircons 锆石的困境 Another paper in Geology said that zircons can give meaningless dates if not properly interpreted. In “Mobilization of radiogenic Pb in zircon revealed by ion imaging: Implications for early Earth geochronology,” a team from Sweden, Poland and Australia began with a warning: “Zircon is arguably the most commonly used geochronometer, but the reliability of ages obtained requires a full understanding of processes that might compromise the integrity of its U-Pb systematics.”Geology In an effort to quantify the effects of metamorphism, the team used an ion microprobe on Antarctic zircons and found concordances and disconcordances. “Ion images of uranogenic Pb reveal a surprising micrometer-scale patchy distribution that is unrelated to crystal morphology or damage,” they said. The abstract cautioned,

9/15/201557 The Trouble with Zircons 锆石的困境 “The 207 Pb/ 206 Pb ratios within these subdomains correspond to apparent zircon ages as old as 4.2 Ga. These are interpreted as artifacts of ancient redistribution of radiogenic Pb, a process that can generate meaningless ages, and are not relicts of ancient (including Hadean) zircon. Scanning ion imaging thus facilitates identification of unsupported radiogenic Pb and enables testing of the validity of old ages from zircon known to have a long and complicated history.”

9/15/201558 The Trouble with Zircons 锆石的困境 Careful reading of that statement might raise more questions than the geologists are asking. Who does the interpreting? What rules of interpretation are employed? Do those rules change over time? How do they know when and where an “ancient redistribution” of radiogenic lead occurred? If that process can produce meaningless ages, what other undiscovered processes might also generate meaningless ages? Who decides what is a relict of ancient zircon or not? How is “unsupported” radiogenic lead identified? Can rules for the validity of zircon ages be established independent of the consensus geologic time scale? Who knows how long and complicated the history of these zircons was? How is it determined it was a long history, independent of the belief they were ancient? If the history is complicated, what unknowns, unknown unknowns and unknowable unknowns might have contributed to the complications?

9/15/201559 The Trouble with Zircons 锆石的困境 Despite these concerns, Geology routinely updates its official time scale. The latest was published in December 2012, claimed to be astonishingly accurate for time periods no human has ever observed: “Over the past 100 years, the confluence of process- based geological thought with observed and approximated geologic rates has led to coherent and quantitatively robust estimates of geologic time scales, reducing many uncertainties to the 0.1% level.”Geology

9/15/201560 The Trouble with Zircons 锆石的困境 We’ll leave it to geophysicists to evaluate the import of these papers, but philosophers of science and competent readers skeptical of ruling consensi should be alert to hand- waving exercises used by practitioners within the guild who might be blind to questions outside the paradigm.

9/15/201563 Scientific Findings Can Be Counterintuitive 科学研究结果可以是违反直觉的 Here are examples of recent claims in science that seem to contradict what some would consider intuitively obvious. They should be kept in mind when evaluating other widely-accepted scientific truisms, like evolution. PhysOrg: Tough love, not small, incremental effort, is needed to turn around failing schools. PhysOrg Medical Xpress: Conservatives with their strict morality tend to be happier than fancy-free liberals. Medical Xpress BBC News: The large horns on rhinoceros beetles do not slow them down during flight. BBC News Nature: Greenland defied ancient global warming. Nature

9/15/201564 Scientific Findings Can Be Counterintuitive 科学研究结果可以是违反直觉的 PhysOrg: Geo-engineering to reduce global warming can have severe unintended consequences. PhysOrg Nature: Tropical forests are unexpectedly resilient to climate change. Nature PhysOrg: African elephants do better in educated countries than in those with large nature reserves. PhysOrg Live Science: Fossil footprint depth can be misleading; depth is not necessarily related to pressure. Live Science Nature: The anus is a sophisticated organ. Calling it a “remarkable orifice,” author Mary Roach said, “No engineer could design something as multifunctional and fine-tuned as an anus. To call someone an asshole is really bragging him up.” Nature

9/15/201565 Scientific Findings Can Be Counterintuitive 科学研究结果可以是违反直觉的 In a final example of counterintuitive findings, Live Science now claims that brain size didn’t drive human evolution. It’s the organization of the brain, not its size, that makes the difference between humans and lower primates. What would Morton and Broca have thought? This contradicts decades of assumptions about what drove humans forward in evolution. But was the prefrontal cortex the “driving force” in the human brain, as the article assumed, or a distinguishing characteristic of an already well-designed being? Who would argue the evolutionary line without assuming it to be the seat of rationality?Live Science

9/15/201566 Scientific Findings Can Be Counterintuitive 科学研究结果可以是违反直觉的 Science is supposed to lead us away from seductive, fallible intuition (Bacon’s Idols of the Theater) toward verifiability. Yet scientists often contradict one another. One thing is true this year; the opposite the next. Don’t let intuition be your guide. Darwin’s natural selection may seem intuitively obvious the way it is usually presented, but it is a vacuous idea: the Stuff Happens Law (9/15/2008, 9/22/2009). We must not be fooled, even when the majority falls in line with insufficiently argued suppositions.Bacon9/15/20089/22/2009

9/15/201569 Freckled Trilobites Had Great Eyes 有雀斑的三叶虫有很大的眼睛 Darlings of the Cambrian Explosion, trilobites had spotted markings and sophisticated eyes. Some have been exceptionally well preserved as fossils, down to the level of individual cells. The compound eyes of trilobites had dozens of individual lenses, each with complex photoreceptor organs at the base. They were described by Science Now, “Looking a Trilobite in the Eye,” as like those of today’s insects and crustaceans.Science Now

9/15/201570 Freckled Trilobites Had Great Eyes 有雀斑的三叶虫有很大的眼睛 “The sensory cells underneath the lenses, however, were ephemeral, and scientists had always assumed that they had decayed without a trace. “So imagine Brigitte Schoenemann’s surprise when she spotted fossilized versions of these delicate sensory cells while x- raying a long dead trilobite with a computed tomography (CT) scanner. “I expected that we would see [something] in the lens of trilobites, but then suddenly we saw structures of cells below the lens,” recalls Schoenemann, a physiologist at the University of Bonn and the University of Cologne, both in Germany. Inspired, she applied to take more fossils to the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility in Grenoble, France, where she could use a particle accelerator’s high energy x-rays to peer deeper into the trilobites’ eyes. Now, she says, she’s created images of the extinct animal’s entire visual system, down to the level of fossilized individual cells.

9/15/201571 Freckled Trilobites Had Great Eyes 有雀斑的三叶虫有很大的眼睛 “So what does the inside of a trilobite eye look like? A bit like a flower, Schoenemann and a co-author report online today in Scientific Reports. Beneath each lens, round sensory cells are arranged like petals around a diamond-shaped photoreceptor able to pick up the dim light that filtered down through the Earth’s ancient oceans. Pigment cells filled in the space between the blooms and likely made trilobite eyes appear brownish-black.”

9/15/201572 Freckled Trilobites Had Great Eyes 有雀斑的三叶虫有很大的眼睛 The article said this discover brings researchers “one step closer to understanding the evolution of vision,” and that new lab techniques have “brought out really new knowledge … about the early evolution of eyes.” Richard Fortey at London’s Natural History, commenting on the fact that these eyes resemble those of living horseshoe crabs, said, “If you have an optical system that works, it can last.” He didn’t comment on how the trilobite eye arose in the first place. The first trilobites already had compound eyes.

9/15/201573 Freckled Trilobites Had Great Eyes 有雀斑的三叶虫有很大的眼睛 Trilobites could see well in their environment, but might not have wanted to be seen. A paper in Geology reported spotted patterns on the shells of some exquisitely-preserved trilobite fossils found in New York. The authors speculated they might have been for camouflage. National Geographic described the techniques the team used to conclude the spots were original, not artifacts of the fossilization process (see also Live Science and Nature). The specimens had some 500 calcite-filled spots arranged in patterns that might have scattered light and blurred the image of the animal to passing predators. GeologyNational GeographicLive ScienceNature

9/15/201574 Freckled Trilobites Had Great Eyes 有雀斑的三叶虫有很大的眼睛 National Geographic suggested many other trilobites may have had these markings. As for their function, the article “cautioned against ascribing a function for the spots on an extinct organism, noting that it’s very difficult to know for sure how the animal used them.” National Geographic Speaking of the Cambrian Explosion, another phylum joins the forty or so phyla that “emerged” without ancestors at the base of the Cambrian. Nature reported that acorn worms (tubiculous enteropneusts) alleged to be 500 million years old have been found in the Burgess Shale in Canada, suggesting to the authors that “hemichordates originated at the onset of the Cambrian explosion.” Exactly how they “originated” fully formed was not explained. Flexing his thesaurus, though, Henry Gee tried to spin an evolutionary tale out of the finding in a companion piece in Nature:Nature

9/15/201575 Freckled Trilobites Had Great Eyes 有雀斑的三叶虫有很大的眼睛 “However, the question remained: how did a large, free- living worm evolve into the minuscule tube-dwelling pterobranch that filters detritus from sea water using an elaborate crown of tentacles. The fossil record preserves all kinds of possibly intermediate morphologies between one creature and another. But the record is notoriously delphic, if not laconic, and on this subject it has even less to say than usual. Enteropneusts, being soft-bodied, do not preserve well as fossils: their record in stone is exiguous in the extreme.” Readers may wish to look up some of those words, but here’s a hint: they have to do with paucity of evidence, such that a variety of conflicting stories can be concocted from the same observations.

9/15/201576 Freckled Trilobites Had Great Eyes 有雀斑的三叶虫有很大的眼睛 Is it credible to believe that trilobite fossils are hundreds of millions of years old? There are numerous problems with the idea. One is the fact that they appear abruptly in the record, fully formed, with no ancestors displaying a record of “the early evolution of eyes.” Another is the fact that horseshoe crabs are similar to trilobites in many ways. Horseshoe crabs are living fossils by themselves, having appeared abruptly, supposedly existing over 450 million years with no changes to the present. Lastly, the trilobite fossils show exquisite preservation, down to the level of spots and individual photoreceptor cells below the clearly-defined lenses. Why do we continue to buy into the evolutionary story and timeline? It makes no sense in light of the evidence.

9/15/201577 Freckled Trilobites Had Great Eyes 有雀斑的三叶虫有很大的眼睛 If former Nature editor Henry Gee admits that the evidence for evolution of complex Cambrian animals is delphic, he has confessed that evolutionary science is not much better off than the ambiguous divinations of well-paid Greek priestesses babbling under the influence of gas.

9/15/201580 Before the Cock Crows, the Biological Clock Strikes 鸡叫以前，生物钟触击 At Easter time, people recall the story of Peter denying Jesus three times before the rooster crowed. Some scientists tried to figure out what clicks the rooster’s clock alarm. A trio of Japanese scientists wanted to know if rooster crowing is triggered by external cues (such as brightening before daybreak) or an internal clock. Describing their findings in Current Biology, they found that roosters kept in steady dim light continued to crow before the dawn hours, but over days, the timing tended to scatter. This suggests that crowing is primarily triggered by an internal clock – but that its accuracy wavers without external cues.Current Biology

9/15/201581 Before the Cock Crows, the Biological Clock Strikes 鸡叫以前，生物钟触击 Those who live around chickens know that roosters will crow in response to external cues, too, such as car headlights, and often crow throughout the day. That reliable morning call, though, provides a natural alarm clock for country folk (but one without a snooze button). Science Now and PhysOrg reported on the findings.Science NowPhysOrg “We still do not know why a dog says ‘bow-wow’ and a cat says ‘meow,’” one of the authors said. “We are interested in the mechanism of this genetically controlled behavior and believe that chickens provide an excellent model.”

9/15/201582 Before the Cock Crows, the Biological Clock Strikes 鸡叫以前，生物钟触击 So here is an everyday phenomenon, observed anecdotally for thousands of years, that scientists still don’t understand. But you can be sure they understand completely how hydrogen evolved into people. Would that scientists focus on experiments like this that rest on observation, testing, and repeatability instead of imagination.

9/15/201583 Before the Cock Crows, the Biological Clock Strikes 鸡叫以前，生物钟触击 Jesus’ foreknowledge of Peter’s denials provides evidence for His deity. He could foretell the final denial just seconds before the natural rooster alarm went off. That by itself would be remarkable, but so much more evidence makes the conclusion unavoidable: Christ was the Son of God. Consider the prophecies written centuries before He came, as in Isaiah 53. Then there is the resurrection evidence: the empty tomb, 500 eyewitnesses of His resurrection at one time, the dramatic turnaround of the fearful disciples into faithful witnesses unto martyrdom, and more. For Easter, treat yourself to two excellent documentary films, The Case for Christ and Prophecies of the Passion.Isaiah 53The Case for Christ and Prophecies of the Passion.

9/15/201585 Sermons From Science -- April 2013 科学布道 -- 2013 年 4 月 Sermons from Science is now published in both YouTube under the name “Pastor Chui” and also in PowerPoint slides in the website http://ChristCenterGospel.org. The contents of this presentation were taken from the Winter 2013 Volume 49 Number 3: Creation Research Quarterly. May God have all the glory. Pastor Chui http://ChristCenterGospel.org ckchui1@yahoo.com

9/15/201586 The Problem of Formic Acid in Miller Experiment 米勒实验中的甲酸问题 John DeMassa and Edward Boudreaux published a paper on “Formic Acid: A Significant but Ignored Product in the Miller-Urey Experiment” in the Creation Research Society Quarterly 2013. 49:211-217. The abstract states that “In 1953 Stanley Miller tested a hypothesis put forward by A.I. Oparin and, later, J.B.S. Haldane concerning the origin of life. The classic experiment is frequently cited in the popular literature and programming as evidence supporting the formation of primitive cellular organisms from polypeptides that self-organized over millions of years….

9/15/201587 The Problem of Formic Acid in Miller Experiment 米勒实验中的甲酸问题 “Yet many of the reaction products from Miller’s experiment are more problematic for the model than advocates readily admit. Among these is formic acid, reportedly present at about double the combined concentrations of identified amino acids including glycine, alanine, aspartic acid, and glutamic acid. Formic acid can produce a significant negative impact on the formation and stability of components such as a hypothetical polypeptide. Consequently, advocates of the Oparin-Haldane-Miller theory are faced with an acute problem. The present paper explores the reaction chemistry of aqueous formic acid and an imaginary polypeptide assumed to be present in the primordial ocean.”

9/15/201588 The Problem of Formic Acid in Miller Experiment 米勒实验中的甲酸问题 Several important points are noted:  1. The formic acid is two times as all the concentrations of amino acids combined.  2. All amino acids are in both the left-handed and right-handed versions.  3. Many other acids were also formed.  4. The combined pH of all acids was 1.8, a very acidic solution.  5. Hydrolysis reactions are highly favorable. Thus, the imagined polypeptide would never form.

9/15/201589 The Problem of Formic Acid in Miller Experiment 米勒实验中的甲酸问题 The paper concludes that “although the reducing atmosphere on earth required for Miller’s scenario is no longer accepted by geologists, Miller’s discovery of amino acids continues to be offered as support for the Oparin-Haldane origin-of-life hypothesis… Ignored in these considerations is the impact of various reaction products, such as formic acid, on subsequent hypothesized chemical events leading to the hypothetical proto-cell…

9/15/201590 The Problem of Formic Acid in Miller Experiment 米勒实验中的甲酸问题 “the highly acidic environment in Miller’s ‘soup’ (neglecting potential degradation due to other energy sources; e.g. temperature or light) makes a hostile nursery for either developing polypeptide stability. The problem is further frustrated by the presence of neighboring functional groups that assist with chain cleavage. It is therefore altogether unclear how polypeptides could form, or even survive, in this highly acidic milieu.

9/15/201591 The Problem of Formic Acid in Miller Experiment 米勒实验中的甲酸问题 “To produce peptides and maintain them for further chemical evolution, the peptides formed must be isolated from all the cumulated degrading chemicals present in the reaction mixture. This point is also true for the required chiral purity of amino acids and coagents needed to produce a hypothetical biologically active polypeptide. How this isolation could naturally occur can only be the product of speculation and presents a monumental impasse for the hypothesis of chemical evolution.”

9/15/201592 The Problem of Formic Acid in Miller Experiment 米勒实验中的甲酸问题 The above conclusions also apply to planets both inside and outside the solar system. Therefore, you must have a very great faith to believe in chemical evolution in the entire universe.

9/15/20151 Sermons From Science -- April 2013 科学布道 -- 2013 年 4 月 Sermons from Science is now published in both YouTube under the name “Pastor Chui” and.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "9/15/20151 Sermons From Science -- April 2013 科学布道 -- 2013 年 4 月 Sermons from Science is now published in both YouTube under the name “Pastor Chui” and."— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback

Log in

Auth with social network:

9/15/20151 Sermons From Science -- April 2013 科学布道 -- 2013 年 4 月 Sermons from Science is now published in both YouTube under the name “Pastor Chui” and.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "9/15/20151 Sermons From Science -- April 2013 科学布道 -- 2013 年 4 月 Sermons from Science is now published in both YouTube under the name “Pastor Chui” and."— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback