1. Investigating Proton Structure at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider University of Michigan Christine Aidala February 11, 2014 Ohio University

2. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 How do we understand the visible matter in our universe in terms of the fundamental quarks and gluons of quantum chromodynamics? 2

3. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 3 The proton as a QCD “laboratory” observation & models precision measurements & more powerful theoretical tools Proton—simplest stable bound state in QCD! ?... fundamental theory application? M. Grosse Perdekamp

4. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 Deep-Inelastic Scattering: A Tool of the Trade Probe nucleon with an electron or muon beam Interacts electromagnetically with (charged) quarks and antiquarks “Clean” process theoretically—quantum electrodynamics well understood and easy to calculate Technique that originally discovered the parton structure of the nucleon in the 1960s 4

5. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 5 Parton distribution functions inside a nucleon: The language we’ve developed (so far!) Halzen and Martin, “Quarks and Leptons”, p. 201 x Bjorken 1 1 1 1/3 x Bjorken 1/3 1 Valence Sea A point particle 3 valence quarks 3 bound valence quarks Small x What momentum fraction would the scattering particle carry if the proton were made of … 3 bound valence quarks + some low-momentum sea quarks

6. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 Decades of DIS data: What have we learned? Wealth of data largely from HERA e+p collider Rich structure at low x Half proton’s linear momentum carried by gluons! 6

7. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 And a (relatively) recent surprise from p+p, p+d collisions Fermilab Experiment 866 used proton-hydrogen and proton-deuterium collisions to probe nucleon structure via the Drell-Yan process Would expect anti-down/anti- up ratio of 1 if sea quarks are only generated dynamically by gluon splitting into quark- antiquark pairs Measured flavor asymmetry in the quark sea, with striking x behavior—still not well understood PRD64, 052002 (2001) Hadronic collisions play a complementary role to electron-nucleon scattering and have let us continue to find surprises in the rich linear momentum structure of the proton, even after > 40 years! 7

8. Observations with different probes allow us to learn different things! C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 8

9. The nascent era of quantitative QCD! QCD: Discovery and development –1973  ~2004 Since 1990s starting to consider detailed internal QCD dynamics, going beyond traditional parton model ways of looking at hadrons—and perform phenomenological calculations using these new ideas/tools! –Various resummation techniques –Non-collinearity of partons with parent hadron –Various effective field theories, e.g. Soft-Collinear Eff. Th. –Non-linear evolution at small momentum fractions C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 9 pp   0  0 X M (GeV) Almeida, Sterman, Vogelsang PRD80, 074016 (2009) Transversity Sivers Boer-Mulders Pretzelosity Worm gear Collinear Transverse-Momentum-Dependent Mulders & Tangerman, NPB 461, 197 (1996) Higgs vs. p T arXiv:1108.3609 PRD80, 034031 (2009)

10. Additional recent theoretical progress in QCD Progress in non-perturbative methods: –Lattice QCD just starting to perform calculations at physical pion mass! –AdS/CFT “gauge-string duality” an exciting recent development as first fundamentally new handle to try to tackle QCD in decades! C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 10 PACS-CS: PRD81, 074503 (2010) BMW: PLB701, 265 (2011) T. Hatsuda, PANIC 2011 “Modern-day ‘testing’ of (perturbative) QCD is as much about pushing the boundaries of its applicability as about the verification that QCD is the correct theory of hadronic physics.” – G. Salam, hep-ph/0207147 (DIS2002 proceedings)

11. The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider at Brookhaven National Laboratory A great place to be to study QCD! An accelerator-based program, but not designed to be at the energy (or intensity) frontier. More closely analogous to many areas of condensed matter research—create a system and study its properties What systems are we studying? –“Simple” QCD bound states—the proton is the simplest stable bound state in QCD (and conveniently, nature has already created it for us!) –Collections of QCD bound states (nuclei, also available out of the box!) –QCD deconfined! (quark-gluon plasma, some assembly required!) C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 11 Understand more complex QCD systems within the context of simpler ones  RHIC was designed from the start as a single facility capable of nucleus-nucleus, proton-nucleus, and proton-proton collisions

12. Mapping out the proton What does the proton look like in terms of the quarks and gluons inside it? Position Momentum Spin Flavor Color C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 12 Vast majority of past four decades focused on 1-dimensional momentum structure! Since 1990s starting to consider other directions... Polarized protons first studied in 1980s. How angular momentum of quarks and gluons add up still not well understood! Good measurements of flavor distributions in valence region. Flavor structure at lower momentum fractions still yielding surprises! Theoretical and experimental concepts to describe and access position only born in mid-1990s. Pioneering measurements over past decade. Accounted for by theorists from beginning of QCD, but more detailed, potentially observable effects of color have come to forefront in last couple years...

13. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 AGS LINAC BOOSTER Polarized Source Spin Rotators 200 MeV Polarimeter AGS Internal Polarimeter Rf Dipole RHIC pC Polarimeters Absolute Polarimeter (H jet) P HENIX P HOBOS B RAHMS & PP2PP S TAR AGS pC Polarimeter Partial Snake Siberian Snakes Helical Partial Snake Strong Snake Spin Flipper RHIC as a polarized p+p collider Various equipment to maintain and measure beam polarization through acceleration and storage 13

14. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 December 2001: News to celebrate 14

15. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 RHIC polarized proton experiments Three experiments: STAR, PHENIX, BRAHMS Current running only with STAR and PHENIX Transverse spin only (No rotators) Longitudinal or transverse spin Accelerator performance: Polarization up to 65% for 100 GeV beams, 60% for 255 GeV beams (design 70%). Achieved 2x10 32 cm -2 s -1 lumi at √s = 510 GeV (design). 15

16. 16 Proton spin structure at RHIC Prompt Photons, Jets Back-to-Back Correlations Single-Spin Asymmetries Transverse-momentum- dependent distributions Advantages of a polarized proton-proton collider: - Hadronic collisions  Leading-order access to gluons - High energies  Applicability of perturbative QCD - High energies  Production of new probes: W bosons C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 Transverse spin and spin-momentum correlations

17. Reliance on input from simpler systems Disadvantage of hadronic collisions: much “messier” than deep-inelastic scattering!  Rely on input from simpler systems –Just as the heavy ion program at RHIC relies on information from simpler collision systems The more we know from simpler systems such as DIS and e+e- annihilation, the more we can in turn learn from hadronic collisions! C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 17

18. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 18 Hard Scattering Process X q(x 1 ) g(x 2 ) Predictive power of pQCD High-energy processes have predictable rates given: Partonic hard scattering rates (calculable in pQCD) –Parton distribution functions (need experimental input) –Fragmentation functions (need experimental input) Universal non- perturbative factors

19. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 19 Proton spin structure at RHIC Prompt Photons, Jets Back-to-Back Correlations Single-Spin Asymmetries Transverse-momentum- dependent distributions Transverse spin and spin-momentum correlations

20. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 Probing the helicity structure of the nucleon with p+p collisions Leading-order access to gluons   G DIS pQCD e+e- ? Study difference in particle production rates for same-helicity vs. opposite- helicity proton collisions 20

21. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 Proton “spin crisis” SLAC: 0.10 < x <0.7 CERN: 0.01 < x <0.5 0.1 < x SLAC < 0.7 A 1 (x) x-Bjorken EMC (CERN), Phys.Lett.B206:364 (1988) 1705 citations! 0.01 < x CERN < 0.5 “Proton Spin Crisis” Quark-Parton Model expectation E130, Phys.Rev.Lett.51:1135 (1983) 464 citations These haven’t been easy to measure! 21

22. Quest for  G, the gluon spin contribution to the spin of the proton With experimental evidence indicating that only about 30% of the proton’s spin is due to the spin of the quarks, in the mid-1990s predictions for the integrated gluon spin contribution to proton spin ranged from 0.7 – 2.3! –Many models hypothesized large gluon spin contributions to screen the quark spin, but these would then require large orbital angular momentum in the opposite direction. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 22

23. Clear non-zero asymmetry (finally!) measured in helicity- dependent jet production at STAR from data taken in 2009 PHENIX results from helicity- dependent pion production consistent Latest RHIC data and present status of  G C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 23 STAR de Florian et al., 2008 : First global NLO pQCD analysis to include inclusive DIS, semi-inclusive DIS, and RHIC p+p data (200 and 62.4 GeV) on equal footing. 2012 update on  G shown here. Best fit gives gluon spin contribution of only ~30%, not enough! -Possible larger contributions from lower (unmeasured) momentum fractions?? - Or: Significant orbital angular momentum contributions? Need to understand better how to measure orbital angular momentum (And exact interpretation of such measurements!)

24. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 24 Proton spin structure at RHIC Prompt Photons, Jets Back-to-Back Correlations Single-Spin Asymmetries Transverse-momentum- dependent distributions Not expected to resolve spin crisis, but of particular interest given surprising isospin-asymmetric structure of the unpolarized sea discovered by E866 at Fermilab. Transverse spin and spin-momentum correlations

25. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 25 Flavor-separated sea quark helicities through W production Parity violation of the weak interaction in combination with control over the proton spin orientation gives access to the flavor spin structure in the proton! Flavor separation of the polarized sea quarks with no reliance on fragmentation functions, and at much higher scale than previous fixed-target experiments. Complementary to semi-inclusive DIS measurements.

26. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 26 Flavor-separated sea quark helicities through W production DSSV, PRL101, 072001 (2008) 2008 global fit to helicity distributions (before RHIC W data): Indication of SU(3) breaking in the polarized quark sea (as in the unpolarized sea), but still relatively large uncertainties on helicity distributions of anti-up and anti- down quarks

27. Parity-violating single-helicity asymmetries C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 27 Large parity-violating asymmetries seen by both PHENIX and STAR for W+ and W-. PHENIX: arXiv:1009.0505 STAR Better-constrained W+ measurement shifts anti- down contribution to be slightly more negative. Lots more data taken in 2013—stay tuned

28. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 28 Proton spin structure at RHIC Prompt Photons, Jets Back-to-Back Correlations Single-Spin Asymmetries Transverse-momentum- dependent distributions Transverse spin and spin-momentum correlations

29. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 1976: Discovery in p+p collisions! Huge transverse single-spin asymmetries W.H. Dragoset et al., PRL36, 929 (1976) left right Argonne  s=4.9 GeV Charged pions produced preferentially on one or the other side with respect to the transversely polarized beam direction 29 Due to quark transversity, i.e. correlation of transverse quark spin with transverse proton spin? Other effects? We’ll need to wait more than a decade for the birth of a new subfield in order to explore the possibilities...

30. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 Transverse-momentum-dependent distributions and single-spin asymmetries D.W. Sivers, PRD41, 83 (1990) 1989: The “Sivers mechanism” is proposed in an attempt to understand the observed asymmetries. Departs from the traditional collinear factorization assumption in pQCD and proposes a correlation between the intrinsic transverse motion of the quarks and gluons and the proton’s spin 30 Spin and momenta can be of partons or hadrons The Sivers distribution: the first transverse- momentum-dependent distribution (TMD) New frontier! Parton dynamics inside hadrons, and in the hadronization process

31. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 Quark distribution functions No (explicit) k T dependence k T - dependent, T-odd k T - dependent, T-even Transversity Sivers Boer-Mulders Similarly, can have k T -dependent fragmentation functions (FFs). One example: the chiral-odd Collins FF, which provides one way of accessing transversity distribution (also chiral-odd). 31 Relevant measurements in simpler systems (DIS, e+e-) only starting to be made over the last ~8 years, providing evidence that many of these correlations are non-zero in nature! Rapidly advancing field both experimentally and theoretically.

32. 32 Sivers C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 e+p  +p Boer-Mulders x Collins e+p HERMES, PRD 87, 012010 (2013) Transversity x Collins e+p  +p BELLE PRL96, 232002 (2006) Collins x Collinse+e-e+e- BaBar: Released August 2011 Collins x Collins e+e-e+e-

33. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 Transverse single-spin asymmetries: From low to high energies! ANL  s=4.9 GeV 33 BNL  s=6.6 GeV FNAL  s=19.4 GeV RHIC  s=62.4 GeV left right arXiv:1312.1995 00

34. Effects persist up to transverse momenta of 7 GeV/c at √s=500 GeV! Can try to interpret these non-perturbative effects within the framework of perturbative QCD. Haven’t yet disentangled all the possible contributing effects to the (messy) process of p+p to pions C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 34 00

35. Modified universality of T-odd transverse-momentum-dependent distributions: Color in action! C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 Deep-inelastic lepton-nucleon scattering: Attractive final-state interactions Quark-antiquark annihilation to leptons: Repulsive initial-state interactions As a result: Still waiting for a polarized quark-antiquark annihilation measurement to compare to existing lepton-nucleon scattering measurements... 35

36. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 What things “look” like depends on how you “look”! Lift height magnetic tip Magnetic Force Microscopy Computer Hard Drive Topography Magnetism Slide courtesy of K. Aidala Probe interacts with system being studied! 36

37. Physical consequences of a gauge-invariant quantum theory: Aharonov-Bohm (1959) C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 Wikipedia: “The Aharonov–Bohm effect is important conceptually because it bears on three issues apparent in the recasting of (Maxwell's) classical electromagnetic theory as a gauge theory, which before the advent of quantum mechanics could be argued to be a mathematical reformulation with no physical consequences. The Aharonov–Bohm thought experiments and their experimental realization imply that the issues were not just philosophical. The three issues are: whether potentials are "physical" or just a convenient tool for calculating force fields; whether action principles are fundamental; the principle of locality.” 37

38. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 Physics Today, September 2009 : The Aharonov–Bohm effects: Variations on a subtle theme, by Herman Batelaan and Akira Tonomura. “Aharonov stresses that the arguments that led to the prediction of the various electromagnetic AB effects apply equally well to any other gauge-invariant quantum theory. In the standard model of particle physics, the strong and weak nuclear interactions are also described by gauge-invariant theories. So one may expect that particle-physics experimenters will be looking for new AB effects in new domains.” 38 Physical consequences of a gauge-invariant quantum theory: Aharonov-Bohm (1959)

39. Physical consequences of a gauge-invariant quantum theory: Aharonov-Bohm effect in QCD!! C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 Deep-inelastic lepton-nucleon scattering: Attractive final-state interactions Quark-antiquark annihilation to leptons: Repulsive initial-state interactions As a result: 39 See e.g. Pijlman, hep-ph/0604226 or Sivers, arXiv:1109.2521 Simplicity of these two processes: Abelian vs. non-Abelian nature of the gauge group doesn’t play a major qualitative role. BUT: In QCD expect additional, new effects due to specific non-Abelian nature of the gauge group

40. QCD Aharonov-Bohm effect: Color entanglement 2010: Rogers and Mulders predict color entanglement in processes involving p+p production of hadrons if quark transverse momentum taken into account Quarks become correlated between the two protons before they collide Colored partons experience phase shifts due to the nearby presence of a different color-neutral bound state Consequence of QCD specifically as a non-Abelian gauge theory! C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 Color flow can’t be described as flow in the two gluons separately. Requires simultaneous presence of both. PRD 81:094006 (2010) 40

41. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 d  /dp T p T (GeV/c) Z boson production, Tevatron CDF Testing the Aharonov-Bohm effect in QCD as a non-Abelian gauge theory Don’t know what to expect from color-entangled quarks  Look for contradiction with predictions for the case of no color entanglement But first need to parameterize (unpolarized) transverse- momentum-dependent parton distribution functions from world data—never looked at before! 41 C.A. Aidala, T.C. Rogers, in progress d  /dp T p T (GeV/c) √s = 0.039 TeV√s = 1.96 TeV p+p   + +  - +X

42. p+A   + +  - +X for different invariant masses: No color entanglement expected C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 Will predictions based on fits to data where there should be no entanglement disagree with data from p+p to hadrons sensitive to quark intrinsic transverse momentum? Landry et al., 2002 PRD82, 072001 (2010) Out-of-plane momentum component Nearly back-to-back hadron production for different hadron transverse momenta 42 Testing the Aharonov-Bohm effect in QCD as a non-Abelian gauge theory

43. Consequences of QCD as a non-Abelian gauge theory: New predictions emerging 2013: Ted Rogers predicts novel spin asymmetries due to color entanglement (PRD88, 014002) No phenomenology yet, but 38 years after the discovery of huge transverse single-spin asymmetries (as well as spontaneous hyperon polarization in hadronic collisions), I’m hopeful that we may finally be on the right track! C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 PRL36, 1113 (1976) 43

44. Summary and outlook We still have a ways to go from the quarks and gluons of QCD to full descriptions of the protons and nuclei of the world around us! After an initial “discovery and deveopment” period lasting ~30 years, we’re now taking early steps into an exciting new era of quantitative QCD! Work related to the intrinsic transverse momentum of quarks within the proton has opened up a whole new research area focused on spin-momentum correlations in QCD, and it recently brought to light predictions for the QCD Aharonov-Bohm effect, waiting to be tested experimentally... C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 44 There’s a large and diverse community of people—at RHIC and complementary facilities—driven to continue coaxing the secrets out of one of the most fundamental building blocks of the world around us.

45. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 Additional Material 45

46. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014  K p  200 GeV 62.4 GeV , K, p at 200 and 62.4 GeV K- asymmetries underpredicted Note different scales 62.4 GeV p K Large antiproton asymmetry?? Unfortunately no 62.4 GeV measurement 46 Pattern of pion species asymmetries in the forward direction  valence quark effect. But this conclusion confounded by kaon and antiproton asymmetries!

47. Another Surprise: Transverse Single-Spin Asymmetry in Eta Meson Production STAR Larger than the neutral pion! Further evidence against a valence quark effect! Lots of territory still to explore to understand spin- momentum correlations in QCD! 47 C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 PRD 86:051101 (2012)

48. Improvements in knowledge of gluon and sea quark spin contributions from RHIC data C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 48

49. World data on polarized proton structure function C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 49

50. Dijet Cross Section and Double Helicity Asymmetry C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 50 STAR Dijets as a function of invariant mass More complete kinematic reconstruction of hard scattering—pin down x values probed

51. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 Comparison of NLO pQCD calculations with BRAHMS  data at high rapidity. The calculations are for a scale factor of  =p T, KKP (solid) and DSS (dashed) with CTEQ5 and CTEQ6.5. Surprisingly good description of data, in apparent disagreement with earlier analysis of ISR  0 data at 53 GeV. √s=62.4 GeV Forward pions 51

52. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 √s=62.4 GeV Forward kaons K - data suppressed ~order of magnitude (valence quark effect). NLO pQCD using recent DSS FF’s gives ~same yield for both charges(??). Related to FF’s? PDF’s?? K + : Not bad! K - : Hmm… 52

53. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 Fragmentation Functions (FF’s): Improving Our Input for Inclusive Hadronic Probes FF’s not directly calculable from theory—need to be measured and fitted experimentally The better we know the FF’s, the tighter constraints we can put on the polarized parton distribution functions! Traditionally from e+e- data—clean system! Framework now developed to extract FF’s using all available data from deep-inelastic scattering and hadronic collisions as well as e+e- –de Florian, Sassot, Stratmann: PRD75:114010 (2007) and arXiv:0707.1506 53

54. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 present x -range  s = 200 GeV Extend to lower x at  s = 500 GeV Extend to higher x at  s = 62.4 GeV Extending x Coverage Measure in different kinematic regions –e.g. forward vs. central Change center-of-mass energy –Most data so far at 200 GeV –Brief run in 2006 at 62.4 GeV –First 500 GeV data-taking to start next month! 62.4 GeV PRD79, 012003 (2009) 200 GeV 54

55. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 Prokudin et al. at Ferrara 55

56. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 Prokudin et al. at Ferrara 56

57. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 Forward neutrons at  s=200 GeV at PHENIX Mean p T (Estimated by simulation assuming ISR p T dist.) 0.4<|x F |<0.6 0.088 GeV/c 0.6<|x F |<0.8 0.118 GeV/c 0.8<|x F |<1.0 0.144 GeV/c neutron charged particles preliminary ANAN Without MinBias -6.6 ±0.6 % With MinBias -8.3 ±0.4 % Large negative SSA observed for x F >0, enhanced by requiring concidence with forward charged particles (“MinBias” trigger). No x F dependence seen. 57

58. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 Single-Spin Asymmetries for Local Polarimetry: Confirmation of Longitudinal Polarization BlueYellow Spin Rotators OFF Vertical polarization BlueYellow Spin Rotators ON Correct Current Longitudinal polarization! BlueYellow Spin Rotators ON Current Reversed! Radial polarization  ANAN 58

59. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 q1q1 quark-1 spin Collins effect in e+e- Quark fragmentation will lead to effects in di-hadron correlation measurements! The Collins Effect Must be Present In e + e - Annihilation into Quarks! electron positron q2q2 quark-2 spin 59

60. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 Helicity Flip Amplitudes Elastic proton-quark scattering (related to inelastic scattering through optical theorem) Three independent pdf’s corresponding to following helicity states: Take linear combinations to form: Helicity average Helicity difference Helicity flip Helicity flip distribution also called the “transversity” distribution. Corresponds to the difference in probability of scattering off of a transversely polarized quark within a transversely polarized proton with the quark spin parallel vs. antiparallel to the proton’s. Chiral-odd! But chirality conserved in QCD processes... Can transversity exist and produce observable effects? 60

61. Calibration using different probes Electroweak probes of the hot, dense matter in the A+A final state already exploited –Direct photons, internal conversions of thermal photons, Z bosons Learn by comparing to a variety of strongly interacting probes –Light mesons as proxies for light quarks—various potential means of in- medium energy loss –Charm and bottom mesons as proxies for heavy quarks—less affected by radiative energy loss d+A allows us instead to use strong probes of the initial state e+A will enable electroweak probes of the initial state for the first time! C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 61

62. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 62 Sampling the Integral of  G:  0 p T vs. x gluon Based on simulation using NLO pQCD as input Inclusive asymmetry measurements in p+p collisions sample from wide bins in x— sensitive to (truncated) integral of  G, not to functional form vs. x PRL 103, 012003 (2009)

63. Total W Cross Section PHENIX made first- ever W measurement in p+p collisions! In agreement with predictions C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 63 PHENIX: PRL 106:062101 (2011)

64. PHENIX W Measurements C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 64

65. Final W Results from 2009 Data C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 65 STAR: arXiv:1009.0326PHENIX: arXiv:1009.0505

66. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 Longitudinal (Helicity) vs. Transverse Spin Structure Transverse spin structure of the proton cannot be deduced from longitudinal (helicity) structure –Spatial rotations and Lorentz boosts don’t commute! –Only the same in the non-relativistic limit Transverse structure linked to intrinsic parton transverse momentum (k T ) and orbital angular momentum! 66

67. Factorization and universality in perturbative QCD Need to systematically factorize short- and long-distance physics—observable physical QCD processes always involve at least one long-distance scale (confinement)! Long-distance (i.e. non-perturbative) functions need to be universal in order to be portable across calculations for many processes (and to be meaningful in describing hadron structure!) C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 67 Measure observables sensitive to parton distribution functions (pdfs) and fragmentation functions (FFs) in many colliding systems over a wide kinematic range  constrain by performing simultaneous fits to world data

68. Factorization and Color 2010—groundbreaking work by T. Rogers, P. Mulders claiming that pQCD factorization is broken in processes involving more than two hadrons total if parton k T is taken into account (TMD pdfs and/or FFs) –PRD 81, 094006 (2010) –No unique color flow C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 68 Transverse momentum-dependent distributions an exciting sub-field—lots of recent experimental activity, and theoretical questions probing deep issues of both universality and factorization in (perturbative) QCD!

69. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 PHENIX Detector 2 central spectrometers -Track charged particles and detect electromagnetic processes 2 forward spectrometers - Identify and track muons Philosophy: High rate capability to measure rare probes, but limited acceptance. azimuth 69

70. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 70 BRAHMS detector Philosophy: Small acceptance spectrometer arms designed with good charged particle ID.

71. The STAR Detector at RHICSTAR 71 C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014

72. Neural Network PDF Collaboration Helicity Fits No RHIC data included yet Neural network techniques systematically explore a very wide range of functional forms, greatly reducing systematic uncertainties due to choice of functional form C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 72

73. The other side of the “confinement coin”: Formation of QCD bound states

74. Moving beyond traditional quark and gluon fragmentation functions For decades only considered the probability of a particular flavor quark “fragmenting” to a particular final-state hadron as a function of the momentum fraction of the quark taken by the produced hadron Now starting to investigate –transverse-momentum-dependent fragmentation functions –spin-momentum correlations in the process of hadronization –dihadron fragmentation functions –…–… C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 74 e+e-  2 “jets” of hadrons

75. Evidence of other hadronization mechanisms in the presence of additional quarks and gluons Increased production of baryons (3-quark bound states) compared to mesons (2-quark bound states) in d+Au collisions with respect to p+p collisions Greater enhancement of 3- quark bound states the more the deuteron and gold nuclei overlap Suggests new hadron production mechanism enabled by presence of additional quarks/nucleons –Quark recombination? C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 PRC88, 024906 (2013) 75

76. Evidence of other hadronization mechanisms in the presence of additional quarks and gluons Similar enhancement of 3-quark bound states in Au+Au collisions Again greater enhancement the more the gold nuclei overlap C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 PRC88, 024906 (2013) 76

77. Bound states of QCD bound states: Creating nuclei (and antinuclei!) in high-energy heavy ion collisions C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 STAR Nature 473, 353 (2011) 77

78. C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 78 Nucleon structure: The early years 1932: Estermann and Stern measure proton anomalous magnetic moment  proton not a pointlike particle! 1960s: Quark structure of the nucleon –SLAC inelastic electron-nucleon scattering experiments by Friedman, Kendall, Taylor  Nobel Prize –Theoretical development by Gell-Mann  Nobel Prize 1970s: Formulation of QCD...

79. “Transversity” pdf: Correlates proton transverse spin and quark transverse spin “Sivers” pdf: Correlates proton transverse spin and quark transverse momentum “Boer-Mulders” pdf: Correlates quark transverse spin and quark transverse momentum Spin-momentum correlations and the proton as a QCD “laboratory” C. Aidala, Ohio U., February 11, 2014 79 S p -S q coupling S p -L q coupling S q -L q coupling