Presentation on theme: "Anglophone perceptions of Arabic syllable structure"— Presentation transcript:
1Anglophone perceptions of Arabic syllable structure Azra N. Ali, Michael Ingleby and David PeeblesUniversity of HuddersfieldEngland
2IntroductionExisting studies have shown that the syllable has an internal hierarchical structure:syll = (onset) + rhymerhyme = nucleus + (coda)e.g. “flame” f l + (aI + m)
3Detecting syllables in the mental models The syllable structure has been tested empirically using word games with concealed parts.(Mehler et al, 1981)(Ferrand & Segue, 1996; Segui & Ferrand, 2002)
4Alternative MethodWe outline here an alternative method for probing syllable structure.We have sought for an empirical probe that engages only one mode of perception:that concerned with audiovisual stimuliprobed by response of groups of participants to audiovisually incongruent data (McGurk effect).
5McGurk Effect most normal adults reported fusion percept /da/ or /Da/ When humans are presented with conflicting (or incongruent) audio and visual stimuli, the speech percept elicited may differ from that in either channel …..because of ‘phonological fusion’.McGurk and MacDonald asked their recording technician to create a videotape with the audio syllable /ba/ dubbed onto a visual /ga/.most normal adults reported fusion percept /da/ or /Da/symbolically, AUD(ba||ga)VIS → (da)PER|(Da)PER…
6McGurk fusion ratesFusion rate – measured as the proportion of participants that perceive a fusion.
7Probing syllable structure using the McGurk effect McGurk fusion rates have been used successfully to probe syllable structure of English words (Ali, 2003; Ali & Ingleby 2005)Findings showed significant coda / onset differences of fusion rateCodas fuse more readily than onsetsAUD(map||mack)VIS → (mat)PER ~75%AUD(bale||gale)VIS → (dale)PER ~45%
8Coda-Onset Difference Such differences survive in branching constituents, polysyllabic words and words embedded in natural phrase contexts.(Ali 2003; Ali & Ingleby 2004)
9CV LanguagesIn a language without codas, however, the quantitative distinction between fusion rates in codas and onsets obviously cannot persist.Although no-coda languages are known, Arabic syllabic structure is contested. In such a contested case.one could use incongruent stimuli to open up the contest to experimental test,seeking to falsify the no-coda hypothesis by finding the segments that show too much fusion to be onsets.
10Arabic Language (1)The Arabic tradition of Sybawaih, on which the (phonetic) alphabet for Arabic is founded, uses CV units symbolised orthographically by a consonant with a vowel diacritic فَ = /fa/ : فِ = /fi/ فُ = /fu/In the Western tradition, however, classical scholars, treating Arabic like Latin and Greek, have postulated that there are closed syllables CVC, CVVC, CVCC.Recently, Baothman’s study (2002) of Arabic speech patterns amasses evidence that Arabic has a CV phonology. This suggests that the Western tradition should be questioned.
11Arabic Syllable Structure (2) Thus, an preliminary aim of this paper is to question empirically whether native Arabic speakers have codas in their mental representation of Arabic speech.We used word stimuli with an incongruent phonetic segment that would be a coda in the Western tradition but an onset in the Sybawaih view, and other stimuli incongruent at undisputed onset sitesNull H0: that fusion rates are the same at onset and ‘coda’ sites.Alternative H1: that fusion rates are not the same for onsets and ‘codas’.
12Results of Preliminary Aim Table 1 – fusion rates
13Arabic Syllable Structure (3) Primary AimHaving confirmed that fusion rates are the same at onset and ‘coda’ sites for Arabophones. We subjected Anglophones to the same Arabic word stimuli that had confirmed no-coda perceptions amongst Arabophones:Null hypothesis H0: Anglophones fuse Arabic word stimuli at the same rate with incongruity at onset and ‘coda’ sitesAlternative H1: Anglophones fuse Arabic word stimuli at significantly different rates at these sites
16A more recent study: Geminates in Arabic Arabophones show bimodally distributed fusion rates between singleton and geminate consonantsSignificant differences in fusion rates between singletons (fusing readily), and geminates (resistant to fusion).But when the same Arabic stimuli are put to Anglophones, their fusion rates are unimodally distributedfusion rates for singletons and geminates were similar, no significant differences.
17Summary (1)These new results suggest that Arabophones use mental models of speech that differ markedly from the mental models that mediate speech perception in Anglophones.Further research questions –Subject Arabophones to English stimuli
18Summary (2) Further research questions – For an Anglophone learning Arabic, at what point on the learning curve, does a student acquire the no-coda mental model that characterises Arabophones?What are the fusion habits of those bilingually fluent from an early age ?….Probing syllable structure of Moroccan Arabic.