Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Notes on the i3 Applications Received Summary Document 1.The information in this summary is based primarily on the supplemental Applicant Information Sheets.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Notes on the i3 Applications Received Summary Document 1.The information in this summary is based primarily on the supplemental Applicant Information Sheets."— Presentation transcript:

1 Notes on the i3 Applications Received Summary Document 1.The information in this summary is based primarily on the supplemental Applicant Information Sheets submitted by applicants to the i3 grant program; because not all applicants submitted an Applicant Information Sheet, the summary that follows does not necessarily include all applications in all summary data. 2.Inclusion of an application in the summary data that follows does not ensure that the application will be considered eligible for an award, or that the application will be funded by the Department of Education. 3.Inclusion of an application in this summary information is not an endorsement of an organization, idea, program, or product, and the Department does not validate or guarantee the accuracy of this information. The data are provided in this summary solely for the convenience of the public.

2 Competition Designation: Applicant Type: Absolute Priority Addressed: Absolute PriorityScale-upValidationTotal Teacher or Principal Effectiveness 21517 College & Career Ready Standards 11617 Low- Performing Schools (Scale-up only) 1n/a1 STEM Education (Scale-up only) 0n/a0 Students with Disabilities (Validation only) n/a44 Total43539 Funds Requested by Applicant Type Non-profit w/ LEA$306,319,979 LEA$40,689,847 Non-profit w/ consortium $90,926,252 Total$437,936,078 Funds Requested by Competition Scale-up$64,697,056 Validation$373,239,022 Total$437,936,078

3 Absolute Priority Designation Under the Rural Priority: * Applicants applying under the rural priority must also address one of the other absolute priorities. Competitive and Invitational Priorities Addressed: * Applies exclusively to Validation grants under absolute priority one. Priority Scale- up Validation Teacher or Principal Effectiveness 24 College & Career Ready Standards 03 Students with Disabilities n/a2 Total29 SubpartCount Teacher or Principal Effectiveness (subpart a): Models of induction & support 7 Teacher or Principal Effectiveness (subpart b): Extend highly effective teachers' reach 8 Total15

4 ID OrganizationStateCompetition Designation 1 Farmington Municipal SchoolsNew MexicoScale-up 2 Higher Achievement Program, Inc.District of ColumbiaScale-up 3 North Carolina New SchoolsNorth CarolinaScale-up 4 Success for All FoundationMarylandScale-up 5 826 NationalCaliforniaValidation 6 AppleTree Institute for Education Innovation, Inc.District of ColumbiaValidation 7 Board of Regents, Univ of Nebraska, Univ of Nebraska-LincolnNEBRASKAValidation 8 Boys & Girls Club of North Central GeorgiaGeorgiaValidation 9 Boys and Girls Club of AmericaGeorgiaValidation 10 District School Board of Pasco CountyFloridaValidation 11 Educational Testing ServiceNew JerseyValidation 12 Farmington Municipal SchoolsNew MexicoValidation 13 Higher Achievement Program, Inc.District of ColumbiaValidation 14 Irwin and Florence Rosten FoundationMontanaValidation 15 Johns Hopkins UniversityMarylandValidation 16 KIPP Inc.TexasValidation 17 Legacy Builders FoundationGeorgiaValidation 18 Literacy Design CollaborativeNew YorkValidation 19 Metropolitan Education CommissionArizonaValidation 20 National Academy FoundationNew YorkValidation 21 National Institute for School LeadershipDistrict of ColumbiaValidation 22 National Math and Science InitiativeTexasValidation 23 New York University School of MedicineNew YorkValidation 24 Ohio Valley Educational CooperativeKentuckyValidation 25 Ohio Valley Educational FoundationKentuckyValidation 26 Old Dominion University Research FoundationVirginiaValidation 27 Southern Methodist UniversityTexasValidation 28 Successful Practices Network, IncNew YorkValidation 29 Texas A&M Engineering Experiment StationTexasValidation 30 Texas A&M UniversityTexasValidation 31 The Regents of the University of California (Davis)CaliforniaValidation 32 THINK TogetherCaliforniaValidation 33 University of Central OklahomaOklahomaValidation 34 University of Kansas Center for Research, Inc.KansasValidation 35 University of Kansas Center for Research, Inc.KansasValidation 36 University of North Carolina at Chapel HillNorth CarolinaValidation 37 Ventura County Office of EducationCaliforniaValidation 38 Warwick Valley Central School DistrictNew YorkValidation 39 WestEdCaliforniaValidation Applicant Organizations


Download ppt "Notes on the i3 Applications Received Summary Document 1.The information in this summary is based primarily on the supplemental Applicant Information Sheets."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google