1. FCS ACQUISITION & EVALUATION TEAMING Army Test and Evaluation Command

2. 2 Core Compl Systems Element Level Cap/Lim E, s, s, + Unks Cap/Lim S, S, +Unks M&S Decomposition Red Blue Capabilities & Limitations By Mission + Unks Capabilities & Limitations By Mission + Unks MOPs/MOEs Element Level (ORD, Spec) MOPs/MOEs FoS/SoS Level (ORD, Spec, KPP, COIC) Mission Threads (O&O) FCS Elements (Platforms, Networks, …) MISSION M&S Data TT OT Evaluation Strategy FCS FoS/SoS Cap/Lim E, s, s, + Unks Cap/Lim @ SoS, S, S, + Unks Joint/ Compl Systems Cap/Lim S, S, +Unks M&S Updated as Systems Mature Cap/Lim By Mission + Unks Sensitivity Analyses By Thread Cap/Lim @ Mission, S, S, + Unks

3. 3 Traditional Acquisition Program Mission Fielded Unit New Equipment Effective Suitable Survivable, KPP’s COIC’s, ORD Requirements “PROXY” Issues Mission Capability Exists

4. 4 FCS Acquisition Program Mission New Fielded Unit Effective Suitable Survivable, KPP’s COIC’s, ORD Requirements Capabilities Relates To Warfighter Needs Relates To Identified Criteria

5. 5 ATEC’s Role Independent Evaluator For FCS –Develop MOEs And MOPs To Support Platform And FoS/SoS Assessment Of: Specs ORD Requirements KPPs COICs Address The Capabilities & Limitations Of The FCS Enabled UA Mission Accomplishment –Produce An Evaluation Of Whether The FCS FOS, In The Context Of The UA, Is Effective, Suitable, And Survivable Work In A Collaborative Environment To Maximize Commonality Of Resources & Ensure The Success Of FCS

6. 6 Field Offices System Level Primary Functional Management Location Director ATEC Deputy Director Test Planning, Integration, & Execution Product Assurance & Verification Test Resources M&S/T&E Integration Test Support & Facilities Test Assessment & Reporting Evaluation Liaison Cell LSI Deputy Director PMO Deputy Director St. Louis Office C4ISR Manned Combat Systems Unmanned Ground Systems Unmanned Aerial Systems Complementary Systems Test Integration Lethality/ Munitions Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland National Capital Region Warren, Michigan Picatinny, New Jersey Ft. Monmouth, New Jersey Huntsville, Alabama Ft. Huachuca WSMRUAMBLYPG Ft. Hood Analysis Support CTO Organization System of System Level

7. 7 COLLABORATION PROCESS Combat Developer Defines Scenarios And Vignettes Mission Decomposition: Detailed Look at User Intent And How FCS Enabled Unit Of Action Will Fight ATEC: Evaluation Plan to Assess Capabilities & Limitations PM/LSI: SoS Spec, FCS Design FCS That Meets User’s Needs Within A Shortened Acquisition Cycle O&O, ORD O&O, ORD, Spec, Mission Decomp O&O, ORD, Spec, Mission Decomp, T&E Plans Plan Together, Test Once, Share the Data

8. 8 Core Compl Systems Element Level Cap/Lim E, s, s, + Unks Cap/Lim S, S, +Unks M&S Decomposition Red Blue Capabilities & Limitations By Mission + Unks Capabilities & Limitations By Mission + Unks MOPs/MOEs Element Level (ORD, Spec) MOPs/MOEs FoS/SoS Level (ORD, Spec, KPP, COIC) FCS Elements (Platforms, Networks, …) M&S Data TT OT Evaluation Strategy Updated as Systems Mature Cap/Lim By Mission + Unks Sensitivity Analyses By Thread Cap/Lim @ Mission, S, S, + Unks MISSION Mission Threads (O&O) FCS FoS/SoS Cap/Lim E, s, s, + Unks Cap/Lim @ SoS, S, S, + Unks Joint/ Compl Systems Cap/Lim S, S, +Unks M&S

9. 9 Platform/FoS/SoS Capabilities/Limitations MOEs, MOPs Based On COIs, ORD, KPP, AIs Platform Level –Based On Unique Platform Requirements FoS/SoS Level –Based On Synergistic Effects Of Multiple Platforms –Focused On FCS’ Contributions To Capabilities –Requires Complimentary Systems To Execute FCS Test Basis To Determine Capabilities And Limitations At All Levels

10. 10 Core Compl Systems Element Level Cap/Lim E, s, s, + Unks Cap/Lim S, S, +Unks M&S Decomposition Red Blue Capabilities & Limitations By Mission + Unks Capabilities & Limitations By Mission + Unks MOPs/MOEs Element Level (ORD, Spec) MOPs/MOEs FoS/SoS Level (ORD, Spec, KPP, COIC) FCS Elements (Platforms, Networks, …) M&S Data TT OT Evaluation Strategy FCS FoS/SoS Cap/Lim E, s, s, + Unks Cap/Lim @ SoS, S, S, + Unks Joint/ Compl Systems Cap/Lim S, S, +Unks M&S Updated as Systems Mature Cap/Lim By Mission + Unks Sensitivity Analyses By Thread Cap/Lim @ Mission, S, S, + Unks MISSION Mission Threads (O&O)

11. 11 Mission Capabilities & Limitations MOEs, MOPs Based on O&O, ORD, Based On Live, Virtual & Constructive Events Utilize Mission Decomposition Process To: –Assist In OT Planning –Correlate Capabilities And Limitations At Platform, FoS & SoS To Required Tasks –Determine Requirements For Force Effectiveness M&S Focused On FCS Contributions To Mission Sensitivity Analyses Conducted To: –Determine If Other FCS Or Complimentary Systems May Alleviate Shortfalls In Capabilities Caused By: Technical Limitations Environmental Influences (Including Threat Effects) … –Enable Army Examination Of Alternate Scenarios/ Red Responses

12. 12 1.Defeat enemy forces withdrawing to Baku 2.Seize bridge vic OBJ BISHOP 3.Conduct air assault with 1 dismounted INF CO TASKS JTF UA1 JFLCC UE1 CAB2 1.Establish multiple FOBs, on order conduct handover FOB security to 3d BN 504 PIR 2.Defeat rebel forces W/SW of Baku 3.Secure OBJ CAMEL TASKS UA1 1.Seize RHC fac with min coll damage 2.Defeat Rebel forces W&S/W of Baku 3.Conduct vertical maneuver to Baku TASKS 1.Destroy WMD 2.Seize oil and gas pipelines and prod facilities 3.Seize the RHC fac of the IFP mil forces 4.Seize vital infrastructure with min coll damage 5.Facilitate the transition of power 6.Destroy Rebel forces in zone TASKS 1.Achieve air superiority 2.Destroy WMD capability 3.Facilitate control of energy centers 4.Destroy resisting Rebel forces TASKS Mission Decomposition Missions Tasks

13. 13 Task Decomposition CAB2 Tasks AUTL Task AUTL Sub-tasks MTP Tasks Lower AUTLTasks 1.Defeat enemy forces withdrawing to Baku 2.Seize bridge vic OBJ BISHOP 3.Conduct air assault with 1 dismounted INF CO TASKS 1.Conduct UAV Flight Operations 2.Conduct GCS (C2V) mission activities 3.Conduct Autonomous Surveillance TASKS ART 7.2.1 Collect Relevant Information ART 7.2.3 Display COP Tailored to User Needs ART 7.2.5 Disseminate a COP & Execution Info ART 7.2.2 Process Relevant Information to Create a COP TASKS –TA 1 Deploy Conduct Maneuver –TA 2 Develop Intel –TA 3 Employ Firepower –TA 5 Exercise C2 TASKS ART 8.1.2 Conduct an Attack TASKS Missions Tasks

14. 14 FCS Task to Functional Capability Mapping Tasks Capabilities

15. 15 FCS Functional Capability to ORD Requirements Tasks Capabilities

16. 16 FCS ORD Requirements to Materiel Capabilities Materiel

17. 17 Capabilities/Limitations Assessed At All Levels Decomposition ……… UA Mission Capabilities/Lim UA Level (Mission) FoS/SoS Capabilities/Lim FoS/SoS Level As defined in O&O As defined in COIC, KPP, ORD Platform Capabilities/Lim Platform Level As defined in ORD, Spec JTF Mission JFLCC Task UE Task UA Task FCS Task Platform Task Subsystem Task

18. 18 Example Feedback to Be Provided to TRADOC and LSI Systems Engineering as a Result of this Endeavor thus far: ORD 1215 - ”FCS FoS systems must be capable of automated precision engagements with automated fire control, distribution and clearance procedures with a manual back-up. (Threshold).” Rational paragraph indicates requirement enables “rapid selection of high payoff and most dangerous targets while static or moving”. SOS Spec - no capability at SOS level in spec for “rapid selection of high payoff and most dangerous targets while static or moving”; only addresses “rapid selection of high payoff and most dangerous targets” in paragraph 3.7.4.2.1.4.1 and 3.7.4.2.1.4.1 for threshold and objective requirements for MCS (ORD 3407) MCS. SOS Spec does not include ORD 3825 which indicates selection of high payoff targets requirement for ICV. ORD 1159 – “FCS systems must accomplish position/navigation (horizontal and vertical) to a one meter Spherical Error Probable (SEP) with a Low Probability of Detection (LPD)/ Interception (LPI) and in the presence of electronic jamming. (Objective)” SOS Spec - (3.2.1.3.2) identifies requirement as Objective. Only other references to navigation are 3.2.1.8.15.3.1- kit to enable legacy systems to be interoperable; 3.7.18.1- auto navigation for UAS CL I; 3.7.23.2.1.2.24 – UGS position themselves; directly enables 18 tasks from 3 missions, indirectly enables 37 tasks from 3 missions O&O (SORC) – Required Capability - Terrain Analysis. ORD addresses in 5.9.2 – no ORD Reference number; addresses in Appendix H, 2.5.1.3.1.1.6; Appendix F, Table 302; Appendix J IERs. SOS Spec – could not find any reference to requirement for terrain analysis; directly enables 21 tasks from 3 missions, indirectly enables 35 tasks from 3 missions

19. Applying Mission Decomposition & Capability Mapping to Construct Operational Test Events Sample Application

20. 20 Larger Unit Mission Lane Virtual Loop SoSIL System Live Loop Unit Mission Lane NLOS-C CL III UAS Unit Mission Lane C2V Unit Mission Lane MCS SUGV Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 UA Missions in OT

21. 21 Larger Unit Mission Lane Virtual Loop SoSIL System Live Loop Unit Mission Lane NLOS C CL III UAS Unit Mission Lane C2V Unit Mission Lane MCS SUGV Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Sample Task Set Applied OT Model ART 8.1.2 Conduct an Attack C2V Unit Mission Lane 1.3.3.1 Conduct Zone Recon MTP 34-5-0041 Conduct UAV Flight Operations MTP 34-5-0052 CGS Mission Activities ART 7.2.1 Collect Relevant Information ART 7.2.5 Disseminate COP & Execution Information ART 7.2.2 Process Relevant Information to create COP RECON Unit Mission Lane MCS XX-XX Conduct Autonomous Surveillance SUGV 8.5.1 Attack By Fire an Enemy Force /Position ART 7.2.1 Collect Relevant Information ART 7.2.3 Display COP Tailored to User Needs ART 2.4.1 Conduct Lethal Direct Fire Against a Surface Target MCS Unit Mission Lane ART 3.3.1.1 Conduct Surface to Surface Atk MTP 34-5-0041 Conduct UAV Flight Operations NLOS C CL III UAS ART 7.2.3 Display COP Tailored to User Needs ART 7.2.1 Collect Relevant Information 3.3.1 Conduct Lethal FS NLOS

22. 22 Sensitivity Analyses By Thread Mission Delayed Awaiting Ground Sensor for NLOS Comanche Provide Location Accuracy for NLOS Decomposition Red Blue Capabilities & Limitations By Mission + Unks Capabilities & Limitations By Mission + Unks MOPs/MOEs Platform Level (ORD, Spec) MOPs/MOEs FoS/SoS Level (ORD, Spec, KPP, COIC) Mission Threads (O&O) FCSPlatforms MISSION M&S Data TT OT Evaluation Strategy Example Updated as Systems Mature Core Compl Systems Element Level Cap/Lim E, s, s, + Unks Cap/Lim S, S, +Unks M&S UAV TLE =120M NLOS = 25M CEP FCS FoS/SoS Cap/Lim E, s, s, + Unks Cap/Lim @ SoS, S, S, + Unks Joint/ Compl Systems Cap/Lim S, S, +Unks M&S UAV Cannot Be used as Sensor for NLOS in the precision mode Cap/Lim By Mission + Unks Cap/Lim @ Mission, S, S, + Unks

23. 23 Enemy Destroyed Out of Contact Manned Grnd Vehicle Protection Limited to 14.5mm WIN-T/JTRS Provides Connectivity UAV Provides Enemy Location Decomposition Red Blue Capabilities & Limitations By Mission + Unks Capabilities & Limitations By Mission + Unks MOPs/MOEs Platform Level (ORD, Spec) MOPs/MOEs FoS/SoS Level (ORD, Spec, KPP, COIC) Mission Threads (O&O) FCSPlatforms MISSION M&S Data TT OT Evaluation Strategy Example Updated as Systems Mature Network Provides Enemy Location to Commander Prior to Engagement Core Compl Systems Element Level Cap/Lim E, s, s, + Unks Cap/Lim S, S, +Unks M&S FCS FoS/SoS Cap/Lim E, s, s, + Unks Cap/Lim @ SoS, S, S, + Unks Joint/ Compl Systems Cap/Lim S, S, +Unks M&S Cap/Lim By Mission + Unks Sensitivity Analyses By Thread Cap/Lim @ Mission, S, S, + Unks

24. 24 The Road Ahead TRADOC Complete Decomposition of 1 st Mission TRADOC, ATEC, PM/LSI Identify M&S Requirements Develop Common Database For All Stakeholders –Identify All T&E Events –Include All Measures For Evaluation –Capabilities and Limitations Based –Evaluation of Data and Confidence Levels Continuously Updated

25. Backup

26. 26 FCS Test Program Schedule

27. 27 ORD - KPP Mapping

28. 28 Cap/Lim By Mission + Unks Sensitivity Analyses By Thread Decomposition Red Blue Capabilities & Limitations By Mission + Unks Capabilities & Limitations By Mission + Unks MOPs/MOEs Element Level (ORD, Spec) MOPs/MOEs FoS/SoS Level (ORD, Spec, KPP, COIC) Mission Threads (O&O) FCS Elements (Platforms, Networks,... ) MISSION M&S In Support of Evaluation Updated as Systems Mature Core Compl Systems Element Level Cap/Lim E, s, s, + Unks HWIL MIL Digital SWIL SILs SoSIL Wrap-Around Sim FCS FoS/SoS Cap/Lim E, s, s, + Unks Joint/ Compl Systems SoSIL Wrap-Around Sim Federated Battle Labs Force-On-Force M&S HWIL MIL Digital SWIL SILs PRO-E BRL CAD Element Level Models - Mobility (NATO Reference Model) - C4.(Comms, COP, FIRES) - ISR/Fusion - Synthetic Environment - Behavioral - Environ (Atmosphere, Propagation) - Threat (behavior, Platform, Signature) - Observable(Obscuration, Wx, Signature)

29. 29 RTCA, C3 Driver, Embedded, Field Data Collection Systems Core Compl Systems Element Level Cap/Lim E, s, s, + Unks Decomposition Red Blue Capabilities & Limitations By Mission + Unks Capabilities & Limitations By Mission + Unks MOPs/MOEs Element Level (ORD, Spec) MOPs/MOEs FoS/SoS Level (ORD, Spec, KPP, COIC) Mission Threads (O&O) FCS Elements (Platforms, Networks, etc.) MISSION Instrumentation & Facilities In Support of Evaluation Updated as Systems Mature FCS FoS/SoS Cap/Lim E, s, s, + Unks Joint/ Compl Systems RTCA, Field Data Collection Systems, Large Scale Data Integration Platform Level, Embedded Cap/Lim By Mission + Unks Sensitivity Analyses By Thread