1. Building a safe and confident future: One year on HE Forum 21 st February

2. Employers ADASS ADCS CAFCASS Children England LGA LGID LGE Mind NHS Confederation SOLACE Service users A National Voice Princess Royal Trust for Carers Shaping Our Lives Professional Regulators GSCC HPC Profession Aspect BASW College of Social Work Unison Educators Association of SW Professors SWAP JUC-SWEC Universities UK Government BIS DfE DH Delivery orgs CQC CWDC HEFCE Ofsted QAA SCIE Skills for Care

3. Social Workers’ Reference GroupService users and carers Employers’ Reference Group  Professional standards  CPD  Assessed & Supported Year in Employment  Licence to practise  Career structure  Frontline Managers  Calibre of entrants  Curriculum  Education regulation  Practice learning  Employers’ standards  Supervision  Supply & demand  Workloads  Partnerships Career development working group Education working group Employers’ standard Working group

4. The National Reform Programme recommended by the Social Work Task Force

5. One year on from the SWTF report A different environment for reform Government, policy and priorities –Deregulation and localisation –Munro review of children’s services –DH vision; personalisation Spending cuts and HE funding A new regulator – Health Professions Council Developing role for a new College of Social Work

6. Proposals for five key areas of reform Anniversary report + –Overarching Professional Capabilities Framework –Standards for employers & supervision framework –Principles for Continuing Professional Development –Requirements for social work education –Effective partnership working Proposals to be published later this year: Assessed and supported year in employment Supply and demand model

7. Professional capabilities framework Currently no single comprehensive set of expectations of social workers at each stage of their career Framework proposes nine capabilities that are relevant regardless of level of experience Links to: Entry requirements, levels of placement, qualification AYSE and CPD Performance appraisal/pay and grading structures Forms the main stages of national social work career structure Capabilities agreed, elements under development

9. PCF – what next? Seeking your views on the strengths of the framework and the challenges of developing and using it Particularly interested in: Use of the term ‘capabilities’ Whether we have identified the right capabilities Whether we have included the right job roles SWRB consider early transfer to the College of Social Work important

10. 8 Standards for employers Effective workforce planning Transparent systems for workload management Tools and resources for effective practice, minimising risk Regular and appropriate supervision Opportunities for CPD Support professional registration Effective partnerships for social work education Social work accountability framework

11. New coherent and effective CPD framework Simple, accessible, portable Based on PCF to provide consistent/standardised learning objectives A hybrid approach with an academic core and non academic learning from range of activities (accredited and non-accredited) National recording system through performance appraisal Opens up new thinking about responsibility and entitlement Four principles unpin the proposals – for further discussion

12. What are the four principles? CPD should: Support social workers to maintain and develop minimum standards for re-registration Encourage and motive social workers to improve practice through a wide range of learning opportunities, based on analysis of individual needs, ambition, career stage and learning style Be underpinned by annual appraisal cycle and recording Be simple to access, value for money and with opportunities for qualification and accreditation

13. CPD – what next? Seeking test sites to give feedback by the end of March Seeking your views on whether the proposals will improve the effectiveness and development of social workers at all stages of their career – (incl. impact of setting and finances) Particularly interested in testing out the principles against: existing initiatives and in different settings interrelationship between CPD achieved through academic qualification and that achieved through a wide range of learning opportunities in practice and outside the academic framework inter-relationship between local arrangements and the need for a national framework. SWRB consider early transfer to the College of Social Work important

14. Improving the quality and consistency of the social work degree Suite of proposals to improve the learning experiences of students and result in graduates better prepared to meet the demands and complexity of social work Proposals include: –Improving calibre of entrants - guidance spring/summer 2011 –New arrangements for practice learning – guidance spring/summer 2011 –Continuing work on content and delivery of the curriculum –New Curriculum framework and guidance ready for consultation by Sept 2011, published April 2012 /adopted Sept 2013

15. What are the proposals for calibre of entrants? Written test for all Individual interview Group exercises Agreed UCAS/A’ level points English language assessment Basic skills; English, Maths and IT Continuing involvement of employers and people who use services

16. What are the proposals for new practice learning arrangements? 2 placements: 1 st 70 days and 2 nd 100 days – across the country 30 days to be used flexibly for skills development Practice learning curriculum including statutory interventions for final placement All students to be assessed by qualified and experienced social workers with Practice Educator standards

17. Qualifying Curriculum Specification of outcomes using the PCF Guidance on topics including: –research –assessment –'specialism's –'process' –CPD for educators –Masters vs BA/BSc –different routes –practice learning –exit routes –SU&C involvement –IPE –the student 'contract'

18. Initial social work education – what next? Seeking test sites to try out some of these proposals (placement days, skills development, assessment) but not time limited Seeking views on whether the proposals will improve the learning experience of students and result in better trained social workers – (incl. impact of funding constraints) Particularly interested in: How we can ensure these changes are adopted SWRB consider eventual owners of initial training will be the Health Professions Council (regulator) and College of Social Work (standards)

19. Effective partnership working A partnership framework between employers and educators across whole spectrum of education and professional development Practice placements ASYE CPD Supply & demand Aim is to build on existing partnerships - local, flexible and diverse Able to respond to future change Introduction of formal written agreements

20. What is the proposed partnership framework? Partnership should be: Driven by a shared understanding of the mutual benefits of partnership Based on a formal written agreement, supported by the regulatory framework, sector standards and good practice Based around local, flexible and diverse partnerships, building on existing arrangements, where possible. Structured to operate at strategic and operational levels, and informed by workforce planning, supply and demand Structured to operate across the whole spectrum of education and professional development and able to respond flexibly to new initiatives and policy developments

21. Effective partnership – what next? Seeking test sites to give feedback by the end of March Seeking your views on whether the framework will create effective partnerships between employers and HEIs Particularly interested in: What goals can be addressed by effective partnerships How written agreements will help and what they are likely to contain How existing arrangements need to evolve to meet these new expectations SWRB consider eventual owners of partnership framework are likely to be College of Social Work with endorsement from other key organisations

22. Next steps Discussion today Debate in other forums Test sites Collated JUC-SWEC/APSW/SWAP response to SWRB Further development of the PCF at qualifying level and ASYE