1. Aleš Tomek, Head of Construction Engineering Dept., Faculty of Civil Engineering, CTU, Member of Czech Association of Consulting Engineers

2. Pages of LEGE  My pages with lectures´files My pages with lectures´files http://k126.fsv.cvut.cz/?p=lide&uid=26  Contact: tomek@fsv.cvut.cz Phone: 777241187 Office: B417 On Wednesdays 13-15

3. Requirements for an assessment  1. TEST for Assesment: Multioptional test ( 30 questions)  2. Participation in Lectures ( minimum 9 times)  3. Fulfilling the requirements - homeworks

4. A contract is a promise that the law will enforce. A contract can be a simple oral agreement in which one person promises to work for another in return for payment. Or, a contract can be a complicated document incorporating a variety of supplementary materials and running hundreds of pages in length. Construction projects usually involve several parties and require several different contracts. On a traditionally structured project, for example, there are separate contracts between the owner and the design professional, the owner and the general contractor, and the general contractor and the subcontractors. These contracts establish the relationships between the parties and define their rights and responsibilities.

5. Documents used on a project…..

6. Construction documents generally

7. CONTRACT INTERPRETATION AND STAKEHOLDERS DUTIES

8. OWNERS AND CONTRACTORS RISK

10. Contract Requirements Legally enforceable contract results from the following elements:  Mutual assent  Consideration  Legal capacity to contract  A legally permissible objective

11. Mutual Assent A contract is not legally enforceable unless two or more parties have agreed to be bound to its terms. This is called mutual assent. Parties manifest their mutual assent to contract when one party makes an offer and the other party accepts that offer. An example of an offer in the construction industry is a bid. In the bid, the contractor essentially states, "I offer to build the project described in the contract documents, according to their terms, for 'x' dollars." The owner accepts the offer by awarding the contract to the selected bidder.

12. An offer has been made if the party who received it (in legal terms, the offeree) has reason to believe from the surrounding circumstances, and from the words and actions of the party who made the offer (called the offeror), that the offeror intended to invite the offeree's assent to a contract. An offer creates in the offeree the capability to accept it and make a contract. Once the offeree accepts the offer, a contract has been formed. A contract cannot be formed unless the offer is accepted exactly as offered. Sometimes the response to an offer is neither to accept it as offered nor to reject it completely, but to propose modifications to the original offer. An offer that is modified by the offeree and proposed to the offeror is called a counteroffer

13.  CASE : Assume, for example, that an architect offers to design a new home for a potential homeowner. The terms of the architect's offer are that he will perform basic services up to the time when a building permit is issued for a fixed fee of $10,000. In response to that offer, the homeowner says that he will hire the architect if the architect performs services through the actual construction period, and for a fee of $9,500. The homeowner's response is the counteroffer because it contains terms different from those in the architect's original offer. The counteroffer terminates the architect's original offer. That is, the homeowner cannot change his mind and accept the original offer unless the architect agrees to allow it. The counteroffer is, effectively, a new offer that the architect is free to accept or reject.  A series of offers and counteroffers are often part of the preliminary contract negotiations. This process narrows the disputed terms of a potential contract and may eventually bring the parties to agreement and the formation of a legally binding (enforceable) contract

14. Consideration  A contract is not legally enforceable without consideration. Consideration is the price, motive, or benefit that induces the parties to form a contract. For consideration to exist, both parties to the contract must intend to enter into the contract and must be willing to take on the obligations associated with it. Each party furnishes consideration to support his or her part of the deal. In a typical construction contract, for instance, consideration is a promise to pay money in exchange for a promise to perform work. Consideration involves a bargained-for exchange of something of legal value.  Assume, for example, that a painter promises to paint the house of someone to whom he is not related and to whom he owes no obligations. If that person promises to pay him $3,000 (which is not otherwise owed), the promises have legal value. The parties bargained and undertook to exchange promises to do something that they otherwise had no obligation to do.

15. Legal Capacity to Contract A contract is not enforceable if one or more of the parties who entered into it did not have the legal capacity to do so. Incapacity arises if a party, at the time the contract was made, was either: Under age (less than 18 or 21 years old, depending on state law) Intoxicated so as to be incapable of understanding the nature of his or her action Mentally ill Under legal guardianship

16. Legally Permissible Objective Finally, the law will not enforce a contract whose objective violates a statute (a law enacted by the local, state, or federal government) or the common law (law derived from the law of England and developed through court decisions). A contract that requires one or more of the parties to perform an illegal act, therefore, is not enforceable. An example of an illegal contract is one which requires an architect to disregard fire codes or other building safety regulations.

17. Modifying Contracts A modification is a change to a contract which is made after the contract has been executed (signed by both parties). A change order is an example of a modification to a construction contract whereby the parties agree to a different price, different services, or perhaps a different quantity of materials. The parties are free to modify the agreement, but all the elements necessary for contract formation must be present in order for the contract to be enforceable as modified.The only element that is likely to be missing from a modified contract is consideration. For example, a contractor could claim that certain work was not required under the original contract, and subsequently refuse to perform such work unless a modification is agreed upon which would provide him with additional money. The owner may agree to pay the  contractor to perform the work. If the owner does not pay, however, the  contractor may not be able to enforce the modification, due to lack of  consideration. If the work was, in fact, required by the original contract,  the contractor already had a duty to perform it. By promising it again,  he gave nothing of legal value in exchange for the owner's promise to  pay. The contractor had a prior existing duty to do the work and provided  no new consideration for the modification.

18. to pay the contractor to perform the work. If the owner does not pay, however, the contractor may not be able to enforce the modification, due to lack of consideration. If the work was, in fact, required by the original contract, the contractor already had a duty to perform it. By promising it again, he gave nothing of legal value in exchange for the owner's promise to pay. The contractor had a prior existing duty to do the work and provided no new consideration for the modification.

19. Interpreting Contracts  One of the reasons for reducing a contract to writing is to document what the parties have agreed to should questions or disputes arise. When this happens, it is necessary to look to the contract to interpret its meaning. Therefore, it is important when preparing contracts to make the contract language as explicit as possible. Parties can then avert or resolve most disputes simply by referring back to the terms of their contracts.  There are two basic ways to interpret written contracts: Look to the contract's intent and Apply standard rules of interpretation

20. Intent A fundamental rule of contract law is that parties are generally free to contract on terms to which they can agree. For this reason, when a judge or arbitrator interprets a contract, he or she first attempts to determine the parties' intent. To determine intent, judges and arbitrators look to the wording of the contract, to customs in the industry, to common usage of terms, to the parties' conduct, and to surrounding circumstances. If a judge or arbitrator cannot discern the parties' intent, then he or she will apply other standard rules of interpretation to the contract, or fill in any incomplete portions as deemed proper

21. Standard Rules of interpretation

22. Implicit Terms and Conditions There are certain terms, however, that are frequently omitted from the express language of most construction contracts. Regardless, courts regularly infer promises on the part of the owner, design professional, and contractor. Owners implicitly promise contractors: Cooperation and noninterference Access to the construction site Fair interpretation of the contract documents  Accuracy in the information provided Adequacy of drawings and specifications Conversely, contractors implicitly promise owners: Quality workmanship and materials Timely payment of bills Compliance with building codes and applicable laws Adherence to the progress schedule Design professionals implicitly promise to exercise that degree of skill and  care which can reasonably be expected from similar professionals  practicing in the community.

23. Implicit terms (2) Conversely, contractors implicitly promise owners: Quality workmanship and materials Timely payment of bills Compliance with building codes and applicable laws Adherence to the progress schedule Design professionals implicitly promise to exercise that degree of skill and care which can reasonably be expected from similar professionals practicing in the community.

24. CONTRACT PROVISIONS THAT MUST BE REVIEWED FOR CLARIFICATION 1. Owner’s responsibility Drawings and specifications (construction documents) Site layout Soil borings and site conditions Environmental reports and approvals Abatement of any hazardous material Special studies (traffic, water, utilities) Permits clarification Utilities Disputes with adjacent owners or municipality Testing responsibility Other areas where the owner has control and must submit the information

25. 2.Schedule Type that has to be prepared Updates required Penalty clauses Substantial completion provisions Delays (not covered by force majeure) Extensions Delays caused by owner or owner’s subcontractors or vendors

26. 3. Costs As defined in the contract Allowances and how to be used Definition of allowance items How will GMP be impacted by actual cost vs. allowances allocated? Contingency and how is it to be used and who controls it? General condition’s clarifications (what is included and what is excluded?) Inflation clause Costs covered by the owner Value engineering New regulations by municipal and government agencies Auditing of project by the owner

27. 4. Change orders How defined Method for developing costs Approval process Who signs off on any change orders? Will labor rate

28. 5. Dispute resolution Records that have to be kept Type of daily reports that have to be maintained Owner and CM/GC executive review Independent review board Mini trials Mediation Arbitration Other legal means, including litigation Notice provisions

29. Major parties in realization of contract

30. Communication Matrix in Traditional Contract