Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Retrieval of Snow Water Equivalent Using Passive Microwave Brightness Temperature Data By: Purushottam Raj Singh & Thian Yew Gan Dept. of Civil & Environmental.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Retrieval of Snow Water Equivalent Using Passive Microwave Brightness Temperature Data By: Purushottam Raj Singh & Thian Yew Gan Dept. of Civil & Environmental."— Presentation transcript:

1 Retrieval of Snow Water Equivalent Using Passive Microwave Brightness Temperature Data By: Purushottam Raj Singh & Thian Yew Gan Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of Alberta, Canada

2 RESEARCH OBJECTIVE To Develop new SWE retrieval algorithms using Passive Microwave Brightness Temperature Data of SSM/I Sensor for a prairie like environment of North America * SWE = Snow Water Equivalent (cm)

3 INTRODUCTION Snow: Dominant source of Water Supply, contributes up to 70% in many parts of Canada Seasonal Variation of SWE: Critical to an effective management of Water Resources Snow course & snow gauge data: Point measurements & Limited Airborne Data for SWE: Expensive

4 PASSIVE MICROWAVE RADIOMETRY Passive Microwave (PM): can penetrate clouds & provide information during night Daily PM data available on a global basis Satellite Microwave data: To retrieve SWE Chang et al.,1976; Goodison et al.,1986; etc. Basis of microwave detection of snow: Redistribution of upwelling radiation (RTM, SM)

5 STUDY SITE Red River Basin (120,000 Km^2) Elevation Range: 237-552m Figure 1. The Red River basin study area of eastern North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota.

6 DATA Airborne SWE Data(88, 89 & 97)->NWS SSM/I Brightness Temperature Year SSM/I Ascending/Descend Source 1988: DMSP(F8) 6:13 18:13 -> NSIDC 1989: DMSP(F8) 6:13 18:13 -> NSIDC 1997: DMSP(F10) 22:24 10:24 -> MSFC 1997: DMSP(F13) 17:46 5:46 -> MSFC Other Data Land Use/Cover & DEM(30 arc”) -> USGS Temperature & Precipitation -> HPCC Total Precipitable Water(1 deg.) -> TOVS

7 Airborne SWE Data: ->NWS Year 1988 1989 1997 # of Airborne Data: 65 241 192 # of Gridded Data: 52 175 197 # of Dry Snow Cases: 16 121 119 Mean SWE(cm) 3.43 9.25 13.55 Cumulative Snowfall 1997 1989 1988 Cumulative snowfall in cm.

8 Selection Criteria for Dry Snow Cases V37 9 °K ! Goodison et al.,’86 V37-H37 => 10 °K ! Walker & Goodison’93 P_factor > 0.026 V37 > 225 °K (DMSP-F8) P_factor < 0.041 (F10/F13) Where, V37: 37GHz Vertical Polarization Brightness Temperature(°K) P_factor or polarization factor = (V37-H37)/(V37+H37) ! From Present Study

9 RETRIEVAL ALGORITHMS Goodison et al.,’94: SWE=K 1 +K 2 (V19-V37)..(1) Chang et al.,’96: SWE=K 3 +K 4 (H19-H37)(1-A F )..(2) Proposed: (a) Conventional Regression (b) PPR (a) SWE = K 5 (V19-H37) + K 6 (AMSL) + K 7 (1-A F ) + K 8 (1-A W )T A + K 9 (TPW)..(3)

10 Projection Pursuit Regression (PPR): Figure 2.Calibration Results: Fraction of unexplained variance (U) versus the number of terms (Mo) for the PPR model using selected dry snow cases, ascending set of SSM/I data of 1989.

11 Figure 3. Scatterplots of SWE from Airborne Gamma Ray Vs. SWE Retrieved from SSM/I using Existing (Eq. 1) and Proposed (Eq. 3: Multi-variate Regression) Algorithms. DISCUSSION OF RESULT

12 Figure 4. Scatterplots of SWE from Airborne Gamma Ray Vs. SWE Retrieved from SSM/I using Existing (Eq. 2) and Proposed (Eq. 4: Projection Pursuit Regression) Algorithms. DISCUSSION OF RESULT (Contd.)

13 Necessity to Add Shift-Parameter(or “offset’) Shift-Parameter (SP) required at validation stage. Existing retrieval algorithms: show some improvement with SP. SP depends on the overall SWE of each year. Example: (N umber encircled are SP for Calibration Year) Year: 1988 1989 1997 Mean SWE(cm) 3.43 9.25 13.55 Shift-Para(1) -5.00 0.00 + 4.00 Shift-Para(2) 0.00 +5.00 + 9.00

14 Figure 5. Distinct patterns of inter-annual SWE retrieved from exist- ing algorithms (Eqs. 1 & 2) when plotted against one of the proposed algorithm (Eq.3). Marked improvement with Shift Parameter (SP). DISCUSSION OF RESULT (Contd.)

15 Reason behind Shift-Parameter Snowfall, temperature gradient & snow metamorphism process vary from year to year Scatter-induced darkening is not a function of Scattering albedo alone. It is also a function of Snow- Depth (England, 1975). Also Retrieval algorithms of statistical nature are biased towards the mean. * Scattering of TB by snow grains within the dielectric layer gives rise to Scattering albedo

16 Figure 6. Scatter-induced darkening (  TB o ) versus scattering albedo (  o ) for various thickness (D) of dry fresh snowpack at 273 K, a case of free space microwave wave- length ( o ) of 10 cm (adapted from England, 1975). Reason behind Shift-Parameter (contd.)

17 CONCLUSIONS Reasonably accurate SWE retrieved from SSM/I data from different satellites using Proposed algorithms and calibration techniques like Projection Pursuit Regression (PPR) & multi-variate regression. Introduce a Shift-parameter (SP) to retrieval algorithms. Magnitude of SP depends on the overall SWE difference between calibration & validation years. Introduce new criteria for selecting dry snow cases that are affected by depth-hoar, and/or large water bodies.

18 FOR FURTHER DETAILS ON THIS POSTER PRESENTATION Singh, P. R., and Gan, T. Y. (2000), Retrieval of snow water equivalent using passive microwave brightness temperature data. Remote Sensing of Environment. 74(2):275-286. Thank You


Download ppt "Retrieval of Snow Water Equivalent Using Passive Microwave Brightness Temperature Data By: Purushottam Raj Singh & Thian Yew Gan Dept. of Civil & Environmental."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google