1.  Presentation by Eric Miller, Blinn College, Bryan, Texas. The Federal Judicial System: Applying the Law

2. It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each.

3. Sonia Sotomayor Obama 2009 Clarence Thomas Bush I 1991 Antonin Scalia Reagan 1986 John Roberts Bush II 2005 Ruth Bader Ginsburg Clinton 1993 Anthony M. Kennedy Reagan 1988 Steven G. Breyer Clinton 1994 Samuel Alito Bush II 2006 Elena Kagan Obama 2010

4.  The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) o Article III SCOTUS Congress creates “inferior” courts o Judicial Review The power of SCOTUS to declare another institution’s action unconstitutional Marbury v. Madison- John Marshall o Original Jurisdiction- power to hear a case first only a few rare instances Ambassadors, other public ministers & consuls, foreign diplomats When a state is a party o Appellate Jurisdiction- power to hear appeals from lower courts cases come from the federal circuit court of appeals or state supreme courts

5.  The Supreme Court of the United States o Selecting and Deciding Cases Precedent establishes a rule for settling subsequent cases of a similar nature SCOTUS’ most important function is establishing legal precedents for lower courts to follow stare decisis - adherence to precedent Maintains legal consistency so confusion and uncertainty can be avoided Writ of Certiorari permission allowing a losing party to bring its case before the court gives SCOTUS broad power by allowing it to choose which cases it hears discretionary rule - rule of four Solicitor General Justice Dept. official who represents the US in cases before the Supreme Court

6.  The Supreme Court of the United States o Selecting and Deciding Cases (Cont.) Brief legal argument submitted by each party before the oral argument phase amicus curiae – “friend of the court” a brief submitted by an interest which is not a direct party in the case Oral Arguments- 30 minutes for each side Q & A between the justices and lawyers Judicial Conference held in private after oral arguments chief justice speaks first and votes last

7.  The Supreme Court of the United States o Issuing Decisions and Opinions Decision the outcome of the case (who won?) Opinion more important than the decision because it informs others of the Court’s interpretation and thereby guides their decisions SCOTUS most important function- establishing legal precedents Majority Opinion The court’s written explanation of its decision Plurality Opinion A majority of justices agree with the decision but not on the legal basis for the decision Concurring Opinion when justices agree with the decision but for different reasons Dissenting Opinion Disagrees with the Court’s decision

8.  Other Federal Courts o U.S. District Courts exist in each state courts of original jurisdiction act as trial courts with juries to determine outcomes Only federal courts with juries and a verdict This is where the facts are established make the final decision for most cases Sometimes deviate from SCOTUS precedents Facts are seldom precisely the same Judges may misunderstand the reasoning or position of SCOTUS Ambiguities or unaddressed issues give lower courts flexibility o U.S. Courts of Appeals hears appeals from trial courts o Special U.S. Courts US Claims Court US Court of International Trade US Court of Military Appeals Supreme Court -appellate jurisdiction -limited original jurisdiction Circuit Court of Appeals -appellate jurisdiction only District Courts -original jurisdiction

9. Federal Court System (more complicated structure) Original Jurisdiction Cases Appeals from States

10. Geographic Boundaries of U.S. Courts of Appeals

11.  The State Courts o the U.S has federal and state courts because of federalism o federal Court “myths” overlook these facts About 95% of the nation’s legal cases arise under state law, not federal law nearly all cases originate in state courts are never reviewed by federal courts federal courts must normally accept the facts of a case as determined by a state court o State method of selecting judges Competitive Elections Partisan & non-partisan Merit Plan Political Appointment

13.  The Selection of Supreme Court Justices and Federal Judges Appointed by the president; confirmed by the Senate “term of good behavior” life on the bench can carry out their duties without fear of reprisal by POTUS or Congress enabled presidents to extend their influence on judicial policy long after they have left the White House  Supreme Court nominees o Presidents nominate those with compatible political philosophy o Nominees must be acceptable to others o Very few nominees rejected by Senate after nineteenth century o Lower-Court Nominees Senatorial Courtesy- senators are consulted on the nomination of lower- level federal judges in their state

14.  Justices and Judges as Political Officials o The Role of Partisanship the biggest influence in the appointment of federal judges o Other Characteristics of Judicial Appointees prior judicial experience Demographics o Nearly all recent appointees from appellate courts o Most are white men, but diversity has increased in recent decades

15. President Eisenhower, have you ever made any mistakes as president?

16. Yes, two, and they are both sitting on the Supreme Court

17. Wow, that’s amazing!

18.  The Constraints of the Facts o affect which law or laws will apply to the case o federal courts can only make rulings in response to actual legal cases Bush vs. Gore (2000) halted a manual recount of “undervotes” in Florida Invoked the 14 th Amendment’s “equal protection clause”  The Constraints of the Law o The Constitution and Its Interpretation o Statutes, Administrative Laws, and Their Interpretation o Legal Precedents (Previous Rulings) and Their Interpretation maintains legal consistency over time

19.  Outside Influences on Court Decisions o Public Opinion the Court attempts to stay close to public opinion to avoid a grave loss of public support Wants to avoid outright defiance of its decisions o Interest Groups lawsuits (ACLU) amicus curiae briefs o Congress and the President Strict Constructionism narrow interpretation of the law Loose Constructionism an expansive interpretation  Inside Influences: The Justices’ Own Political Beliefs o major shifts in SCOTUS’ positions have usually been due to turnover on the court’s membership

20.  The Debate over the Proper Role of the Judiciary o Originalism theory vs. living constitution theory Originalism: determine and preserve founder’s intent Emphasizes the meaning of the of its words at the time when they were written Justice Antonin Scalia Living constitution theory: adaptable to changing social situations Emphasizes the principles of the Constitution and their application to changing circumstances and needs Justice Steven Bryer

21.  The Debate over the Proper Role of the Judiciary (cont.) o The Doctrine of Judicial Restraint Compliance- deferring to elected officials Closely follow the law be highly respectful of precedent defer to judgment of legislatures o The Doctrine of Judicial Activism The court sees a compelling need to develop new principles even if it conflicts with precedent or the decisions of elected officials protecting individuals from a “tyranny of the majority” Lawrence vs. Texas (2003) Invalidated a state law against homosexual sodomy Liberals and Conservatives Individual rights vs. States rights/ Business Interests Ledbetter vs. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007) Brown v. Board of Education (1954) Citizens United vs. Federal Elections Commission (2010) Lifted restrictions on corporate and union spending in federal election campaigns

22.  The Judiciary’s Proper Role: A Question of Competing Values o the issue of legitimacy the proper authority of the judiciary in a system based on majority rule the Court has acted legislatively by defining broad social policies prayer in public school prison reform abortion o If Congress disagrees with a SCOTUS ruling it could: rewrite the statute- “Lilly Ledbetter Act” express displeasure with the ruling modify the scope of the court’s appellate jurisdiction amend the Constitution 11 th Amendment 16 th Amendment