Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Marine Mammal Health and Stranding Response Program Evaluation Key Findings John H. Prescott Marine Mammal Rescue Grant Assistance Program Workshop Responsive.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Marine Mammal Health and Stranding Response Program Evaluation Key Findings John H. Prescott Marine Mammal Rescue Grant Assistance Program Workshop Responsive."— Presentation transcript:

1 Marine Mammal Health and Stranding Response Program Evaluation Key Findings John H. Prescott Marine Mammal Rescue Grant Assistance Program Workshop Responsive Management Thursday, December 10, 2009 Photo: NOAA

2 www.responsivemanagement.com

3 Responsive Management Methodology  External Survey of Stakeholders (n = 124)  Survey instrument developed based on 20 in-depth personal interviews with Network participants  Multi-modal Survey Electronic form Mail Telephone  Four Regions Northeast Region Southeast Region Southwest Region Northwest Region  Data Analysis and Final Report Major findings Recommendations

4 KEY FINDINGS Responsive Management

5 Key Topic Areas 1.Participant Training and Educational Backgrounds 2.Funding 3.Event Preparedness 4.Communication 5.NMFS Publicity and Outreach 6.Network Improvement

6 1. Participant Training and Educational Backgrounds Responsive Management

7 Participant Training and Educational Backgrounds  Not all participants have the same educational backgrounds and levels of training. The discrepancies in training and education are commonly viewed as problematic.

8 Responsive Management 72% agree

9 Responsive Management

10 2. Funding

11 Responsive Management Funding  Funding for Stranding Network organizations is a problem. More Network participants disagree (52%) than agree (39%) that their organization is adequately funded to fulfill duties. Of those who participate in post-release monitoring, a majority disagree (63%) that their organization is adequately funded for this. Similarly, “funding” is by far the top answer among resources needed by organizations to improve their effectiveness.

12 Responsive Management 52% disagree

13 Responsive Management 63% disagree

14 Responsive Management

15 3. Event Preparedness

16 Responsive Management Event Preparedness  Substantial percentages of Network participants feel their organizations are not at all prepared for the following events: an oil spill (38%) a disentanglement event (20%)

17 Responsive Management

18 Event Preparedness  Feelings of being unprepared are most commonly due to the following: inexperience lack of training for the event unfamiliarity with proper protocols and procedures for the event lack of available funding and staff

19 Responsive Management

20

21 4. Communication

22 Responsive Management Communication  There may be opportunities to: better educate Stranding Network participants on the role of the national Stranding Coordinator improve Network communication in several areas

23 Responsive Management

24 Communication  Substantial percentages of Network participants describe the following types of Network communication as fair or poor: communication between regions (50%) communication with the NMFS after responses to strandings (25%) communication with other Network participant organizations in region (24%) overall communication with the NMFS (22%) regional efforts to keep Network participants informed of the latest trends, developments, and information (49%)

25 Responsive Management

26 49% 44%

27 Responsive Management 5. NMFS Publicity and Outreach

28 Responsive Management NMFS Publicity and Outreach  Substantial percentages of Stranding Network participants indicate that the NMFS could improve efforts to: provide feedback to the public regarding strandings and other Network information assist participant organizations with media and publicity  A majority of participants also agree that the NMFS should work more closely with neighboring nations.

29 Responsive Management 43%

30 Responsive Management 39%

31 Responsive Management 61% agree

32 Responsive Management 6. Network Improvement

33 Responsive Management Network Improvement  Although organizations’ greatest needs are for additional funding and training, there is also a desire for greater coordination and collaboration throughout the Stranding Network.  Excluding funding, top ways Network participants can enhance the capacity to produce scientific information are: communication / coordination / collaboration additional training standardization of data collection / archiving

34 Responsive Management

35 Network Improvement  Most commonly needed additional resources are: funding training equipment better communication / cooperation staff

36 Responsive Management

37

38 Network Improvement  Network participants think the following should be priorities in their region: improved data collection additional / better funding sources improved communication / coordination / cooperation

39 Responsive Management

40 Photo: PBS

41 Responsive Management PRESCOTT GRANT

42 Responsive Management Prescott Grant  The Prescott Grant is one of the top sources of funding for Stranding Network organizations. Half of all organizations surveyed (50%) currently receive at least some funding through the Prescott Grant. More than a quarter (27%) identify the Prescott Grant as their organization’s primary source of funding.

43 Responsive Management

44

45 Prescott Grant  A substantial percentage of Network participants whose organizations are funded through the Prescott Grant (31%) say they are dissatisfied with the funding opportunities made available through the Prescott Grant.

46 Responsive Management 31% dissatisfied

47 Responsive Management Prescott Grant  Common reasons for dissatisfaction with the Prescott Grant are: the grant does not provide enough funds to cover organizational needs funds do not arrive on time or are awarded late the Prescott Grant is influenced by politics / favoritism

48 Responsive Management

49 Prescott Grant  A substantial percentage of Network participants whose organizations are funded through the Prescott Grant (29%) say they are dissatisfied with the Prescott Grant’s application process.

50 Responsive Management 29% dissatisfied

51 Responsive Management Prescott Grant  Common reasons for dissatisfaction with the Prescott Grant application process are: requires too much information depends too much on politics / favoritism contributes to disproportionate spreading of funds throughout the Network

52 Responsive Management

53 Photo: NOAA


Download ppt "Marine Mammal Health and Stranding Response Program Evaluation Key Findings John H. Prescott Marine Mammal Rescue Grant Assistance Program Workshop Responsive."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google