Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ECE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Communications

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ECE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Communications"— Presentation transcript:

1 ECE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Communications
                                                            Zhu Han Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Class 23 April 16th, 2014

2 OFDM Basic Idea Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing
Divide a high bit- rate stream into several low bit- rate streams ( serial to parallel) Robust against frequency selective fading due to multipath propagation

3 Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing
Special form of Multi-Carrier Transmission. Multi-Carrier Modulation. Divide a high bit-rate digital stream into several low bit-rate schemes and transmit in parallel (using Sub-Carriers)

4 OFDM

5 Transmitted Symbol To have ISI-free channel, Tsymbol>>τ
In OFDM, each symbol has T =Ts L >> τ Guard interval between OFDM symbols Tg>> τ ensures no ISI between the symbols.

6 Guard Time and Cyclic Extension...
A Guard time is introduced at the end of each OFDM symbol for protection against multipath. The Guard time is “cyclically extended” to avoid Inter-Carrier Interference (ICI) - integer number of cycles in the symbol interval. Guard Time > Multipath Delay Spread, to guarantee zero ISI & ICI.

7 Mathematical description

8 Mathematical description

9 OFDM Timing Challenge

10 OFDM bit loading Map the rate with the sub-channel condition
Water-filling

11 OFDM Time and Frequency Grid
Put different users data to different time-frequency slots

12 OFDM Transmitter and Receiver

13 OFDM

14 Multiband OFDM - Simple to implement
- Captures 95% of the multipath channel energy in the Cyclic Prefix - Complexity of OFDM system varies Logarithmically with FFT size i.e. - N point FFT  (N/2) Log2 (N) complex multiplies for every OFDM symbol

15 Pro and Con Advantages Can easily be adopted to severe channel conditions without complex equalization Robust to narrow-band co-channel interference Robust to inter-symbol interference and fading caused by multipath propagation High spectral efficiency Efficient implementation by FFTs Low sensitivity to time synchronization errors Tuned sub-channel receiver filters are not required (unlike in conventional FDM) Facilitates Single Frequency Networks, i.e. transmitter macro-diversity. Disadvantages Sensitive to Doppler shift. Sensitive to frequency synchronization problems Inefficient transmitter power consumption, since linear power amplifier is required.

16 OFDM Applications ADSL and VDSL broadband access via telephone network copper wires. IEEE a and g Wireless LANs. The Digital audio broadcasting systems EUREKA 147, Digital Radio Mondiale, HD Radio, T-DMB and ISDB-TSB. The terrestrial digital TV systems DVB-T, DVB-H, T-DMB and ISDB-T. The IEEE or WiMax Wireless MAN standard. The IEEE or Mobile Broadband Wireless Access (MBWA) standard. The Flash-OFDM cellular system. Some Ultra wideband (UWB) systems. Power line communication (PLC). Point-to-point (PtP) and point-to-multipoint (PtMP) wireless applications.

17 Applications WiMax Digital Audio Broadcast (DAB) Wireless LAN

18 Applications High Definition TV (HDTV)
4G Cellular Communication systems Flash -OFDM

19 Proprietary OFDM Flavours
Wireless Access (Macro-cellular) Wideband-OFDM (W-OFDM) of Wi-LAN Flash OFDM from Flarion Vector OFDM (V-OFDM) of Cisco, Iospan,etc. -- Freq. Hopping for CCI reduction, reuse to 5.0MHz BW -- mobility support GHz band Mbps in 40MHz -- large tone-width (for mobility, overlay) -- MIMO Technology -- non-LoS coverage, mainly for fixed access -- upto 20 Mbps in MMDS Wi-LAN leads the OFDM Forum -- many proposals submitted to IEEE Wireless MAN Cisco leads the Broadand Wireless Internet Forum (BWIF)

20 OFDM based Standards Wireless LAN standards using OFDM are
HiperLAN-2 in Europe IEEE a, .11g OFDM based Broadband Access Standards are getting defined for MAN and WAN applications Working Group of IEEE single carrier, 10-66GHz band 802.16a, b GHz, MAN standard

21 Key Parameters of 802.16a Wireless MAN
Operates in 2-11 GHz SC-mode, OFDM, OFDMA, and Mesh support Bandwidth can be either 1.25/ 2.5/ 5/ 10/ 20 MHz FFT size is 256 = (192 data carriers+ 8 pilots +56 Nulls) RS+Convolutional coding Block Turbo coding (optional) Convolutional Turbo coding(optional) QPSK, 16QAM, 64QAM Two different preambles for UL and DL

22 Calculations for 802.16a -- Example: 5MHz

23 Broadband Access Standards -- contd.
IEEE LAN and MAN standards IEEE (10 to 66 GHz) IEEE a,b (2 to 11 GHz) 1-3 miles, non-LoS IEEE a or .11b, or .11g 2-5 miles, LoS(> 11GHz)

24 The IEEE a/g Standard Belongs to the IEEE system of specifications for wireless LANs. covers both MAC and PHY layers. 802.11a/g belongs to the High Speed WLAN category with peak data rate of 54Mbps FFT 64, Carrier 2.4G or 5G. Total bandwidth 20 MHz x 10 =200MHz

25 The IEEE Standard

26 Evolution of Radio Access Technologies
In Nov. 2004, 3GPP began a project to define the long-term evolution (LTE) of Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) cellular technology 802.16m 802.16d/e LTE (3.9G) : 3GPP release 8~9 LTE-Advanced : 3GPP release 10+

27 LTE vs. LTE-Advanced

28 DS-CDMA versus OFDM DS-CDMA can exploit a0 time-diversity Impulse
Response h(t) a3 time channel Input (Tx signal) Output (Rx signal) Frequency Response H(f) OFDM can exploit freq. diversity freq.

29 Comparing Complexity of TDMA, DS-CDMA, & OFDM Transceivers
Easy, but requires overhead (sync.) bits Difficult, and requires sync. channel (code) Very elegant, requiring no extra overhead Timing Sync. Easy, but requires overhead (sync.) bits Gross Sync. Easy Fine Sync. is Difficult Freq. Sync. More difficult than TDMA Complexity is high in Asynchronous W-CDMA Usually not required within a burst/packet Timing Tracking Modest Complexity Freq. Tracking Easy, decision-directed techniques can be used Modest Complexity (using dedicated correlator) Requires CPE Tones (additional overhead) Channel Equalisation Modest to High Complexity (depending on bit-rate and extent of delay-spread) RAKE Combining in CDMA usually more complex than equalisation in TDMA Frequency Domain Equalisation is very easy Analog Front-end (AGC, PA, VCO, etc) Complexity or cost is very high (PA back-off is necessary) Very simple (especially for CPM signals) Fairly Complex (power control loop)

30 Comparing Performance of TDMA, DS-CDMA, & OFDM Transceivers
Fade Margin (for mobile apps.) Modest requirement (RAKE gain vs power- control problems) Required for mobile applications Required for mobile applications Range Very easy to increase cell sizes Range increase by reducing allowed noise rise (capacity) Difficult to support large cells (PA , AGC limitations) Modest (in TDMA) and High in MC-TDMA Re-use planning is crucial here Re-use & Capacity Modest FEC Requirements FEC is usually inherent (to increase code decorrelation) FEC is vital even for fixed wireless access FEC optional for voice Variable Bit-rate Support Powerful methods to support VBR (for fixed access) Very elegant methods to support VBR & VAD Low to modest support Very High (& Higher Peak Bit-rates) Spectral Efficiency Modest Poor to Low

31 LTE vs. LTE-Advanced

32 LTE vs. LTE-Advanced


Download ppt "ECE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Communications"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google