1. Role of the Court

2. Warm Up
What do you feel is the role of the federal judges regarding interpreting the Constitution?

3. Graphic Organizer Time
How Federal Cases are Appealed
Appealing a Case to the Supreme Court

6. Judicial Review

7. Judicial Review
Judicial review refers to the power of a court to determine the constitutionality of a government action.
The Supreme Court first asserted its power of judicial review in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).
The Court’s decision laid the foundation for its involvement in the development of the American system of government.

8. John Marshall: Great Chief Justice or Greatest Chief Justice?
William &Mary:
Class of 1780

9. Movie Time!!! Judicial Review Marbury vs. Madison John Marshall

10. The Case of the Flying Fish
Little v. Barreme (1804)
The President authorized the Navy to intercept any vessel going to or from a French port.
HOWEVER, Congress had passed a law telling the Navy to seize only vessels going to French ports.
The Flying Fish, a Dutch Ship, was coming from a French Port. It was seized by the USS Boston under the command of Captain George Little.
Captain Little was declared to be liable for executing a command that was illegal in nature.

11. Flying Fish Continued…
Key Issue:
Whether an order of the President, which in effect attempts to make law, can override an act of Congress.
The Supreme Court decides:
No, an order of the President which is in contradiction with an act of Congress is illegally put forth.
Reasoning:
Legislative branch makes laws and the Executive enforces the law. The Act of Congress limited what ships could be seized. The President acted contrary to these limits. His actions were unconstitutional.

12. Extra Credit Challenge
Take Out Your Book
Turn to the Constitution
Find the Following:
Right to Privacy
Separation of Church and State
Freedom of Expression

13. No Luck? Why do you think you couldn’t find any of these?
Do they exist?
Right to Privacy
Separation of Church and State
Freedom of Expression

14. Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint
Judicial Activism- relates to activities of judges who, in the course of carrying out their duties, go beyond the strictly judicial function and enter into the political policymaking arena.
Judicial Restraint- a theory of judicial interpretation that encourages judges to limit the exercise of their own power. It asserts that judges should hesitate to strike down laws unless they are obviously unconstitutional.

15. Examples of Judicial Activism
Judicial Review
Marbury v. Madison
Right to Privacy
Abortion Rights
Roe v. Wade
Abolished Segregation
Brown v. Board of Ed
Dred Scott v. Sanford

16. "It is every Americans' right and obligation to read and interpret the Constitution for himself." — Thomas Jefferson

17. Freedom of Religion (Two Parts)
The Establishment Clause
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.“
It has been interpreted to prohibit :
the establishment of a national religion by Congress, or
the preference of one religion over another.
The Free Exercise Clause
“or prohibiting the free exercise thereof“
It has been interpreted as:
Religious groups and individuals should have the right to meet and worship without undue government interference.
Individuals have the right to choose their own religion.