Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

RTI Center Presentation for the SPDGs January 27, 2009 RTI Center Presentation for the SPDGs January 27, 2009 Amy Elledge Tessie Rose.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "RTI Center Presentation for the SPDGs January 27, 2009 RTI Center Presentation for the SPDGs January 27, 2009 Amy Elledge Tessie Rose."— Presentation transcript:

1 RTI Center Presentation for the SPDGs January 27, 2009 RTI Center Presentation for the SPDGs January 27, 2009 Amy Elledge Tessie Rose

2 Presentation Overview  Introduction to the RTI Center  The Center’s Website  The Technical Review Committees (TRCs)  TA Documentation Portfolios  Questions

3 Center Mission To build the capacity of State Educational Agencies (SEAs) to assist Local Educational Agencies (LEAs) in implementing proven and promising models for RTI.

4 Center Objectives  Objective 1: To identify, adapt, evaluate, and scale up RTI models for identifying and serving students with disabilities;  Objective 2: To provide TA&D to SEAs and LEAs with ongoing TA support, as needed and appropriate, to implement comprehensive RTI programs in districts, schools, and classrooms nationally; and  Objective 3: To disseminate information about proven and promising RTI models to parents, service providers, program administrators, policymakers, and other interested stakeholders across the country.

5 Response to Intervention: An Overview 5 The RTI Center’s Website Amy Elledge January 27, 2009 RTI Center Presentation for the SPDGs

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14 Response to Intervention: An Overview 14 The RTI Center’s Technical Review Committees (TRCs) Amy Elledge January 27, 2009 RTI Center Presentation for the SPDGs

15 Background  Role of the TRC:  To identify and disseminate information about tools and interventions that are grounded in a rigorous scientific evidence base  Three TRCs: (1)Screening; (2)Progress Monitoring; (3)Tiered Instruction  Model :  National Center on Student Progress Monitoring http://www.studentprogress.org/chart/chart.asp

16 Response to Intervention: An Overview 16

17 TRC Process  Nomination and recruitment of members Criteria: (a)member has strong methodological skills (and background in measurement, for screening and progress monitoring) (b)member has a background in screening/progress monitoring/instruction. -- Special attention was paid to including members with expertise on culturally and linguistically diverse populations.  Development of evaluation protocol  Submission and review of tools  Publication of results

18 TRC Status: Screening  Recruited TRC members  Developed protocol  Issued call for tools in reading in September  Received 15 submissions (15 tools across 6 vendors)  Currently conducting first level review  Results to be published in early 2009  Plan to issue a call in math and an additional call in reading in spring 2009

19 TRC Status: Progress Monitoring  Recruited TRC members  Developed protocol  Issued call for tools in September  Received 45 submissions (45 tools across 9 vendors)  Currently conducting first level review  Results to be published in early 2009  Plan to issue an additional call in spring 2009

20 TRC Status: Instruction  Recruited 9 “TRC consultants”  Held initial meeting on December 18  Plan to issue call for interventions in spring/summer 2009  Results to be published by end of 2009

21 TRC Timeline of Activities ScreeningProgress MonitoringInstruction Fall 2008  1 st call for tools in reading issued  1 st call for tools issued Winter 2009  Results published Spring 2009  1 st call for tools in math issued  2 nd call for tools in reading issued  2 nd call for tools issued  1 st call for interventions issued Summer 2009 Fall 2009  Results published

22 Response to Intervention: An Overview 22 The RTI Center’s TA Documentation: Portfolios Tessie Rose January 27, 2009 RTI Center Presentation for the SPDGs

23 Background  Need to provide TA liaisons with sufficient background information to work with states  Previous capacity building activities  Related initiatives and SPDG activities  Need to document TA activities AND relevant state activities  Identify needs and overlap  Need to document progress of states receiving intensive TA  Accountability

24 Goals of Portfolio  Enhance collaboration and dialogue between SEA and TA liaison  Share what we find  Look for overlap among state agency resources/activities  Identify potential collaborative opportunities  Document RTI Activities Over Time  Create a BIG PICTURE of RTI state, regional national  Evaluate TA Effectiveness  Monitor progress of activities in SEAs  Be responsive to current and future (e.g., identify additional TA needs, resources)

25 Creating and Maintaining the Portfolio  Systematic review of state websites  Use search features  Review RTI websites  Review Policies and Initiatives  Ongoing updates or additions  Monthly additions by TA Liaisons  Updates added from publications (e.g., Ed Daily, Center newsletters, state announcements)

26 State TA Portfolio: What is in it?  Compilations of information regarding state’s RTI activities  Five 5 Essential Parts  Introduction: Technical Assistance Information  Section I: State DemographicsState Demographics  Section II: Current Related RTI ActivitiesCurrent Related RTI Activities  Section III: Monthly Update SummaryMonthly Update Summary  Section IV: Capacity Building ToolCapacity Building Tool  Part I: Capacity Building Scale/Dialogue GuideCapacity Building Scale  Part II: Capacity Building Tool Supporting EvidenceCapacity Building Tool Supporting Evidence 

27 Contact Information Amy Elledge aelledge@air.org 202.403.5489 Tessie Rose trose@air.org 202.403.5828


Download ppt "RTI Center Presentation for the SPDGs January 27, 2009 RTI Center Presentation for the SPDGs January 27, 2009 Amy Elledge Tessie Rose."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google