Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Shimon Edelman’s Riddle of Representation two humans, a monkey, and a robot are looking at a piece of cheese; what is common to the representational.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Shimon Edelman’s Riddle of Representation two humans, a monkey, and a robot are looking at a piece of cheese; what is common to the representational."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Shimon Edelman’s Riddle of Representation two humans, a monkey, and a robot are looking at a piece of cheese; what is common to the representational processes in their visual systems?

2 2 Answer: The cheese, of course

3 mainstream (Gwen/CogPO) view [methodological solipsism (the brain we study could equally well be a brain in a vat)] forgets the cheese

4 When neuroscientists see an elephant they see only the calcium phosphate chemistry of the tusk “The mind is a black box” “Mental processes cannot be observed (except via advanced neuroimaging instruments)”

5 Where we agree Knowledge of brain structure can and should inform our understanding of mental function We should not waste time on the mind-body problem

6 Where we disagree Gwen: for science: “every mental process has to be a brain process” Therefore the only way to study the mind is to study the brain BS: we should ensure that we use all the data we can to do good science

7 Communicating about emotions Affect, feeling, emotion, mood, passion, sentiment Anger, astonishment, awe, bliss, despair, disgust, embarrassment, fear, happiness, hate, joy, love, pride, regret, resentment, satisfaction, scorn, shame, sympathy, terror 7 Image credit: notarivs (flickr)

8 Gwen (CogPO) view cripples our empirical work on mental functioning nearly all our data in social interaction, emotional experience, mental health, … literature …, DSM, will be dismissed as unscientific enforcing reduction to mappings between sensory inputs and motor outputs would cripple science

9 Against Gwen view mental representation is about a thing in external reality in virtue of mappings among sensory inputs ‘some puzzling properties of Mind, such as "aboutness" and subjectivity, can be understood here in a concrete context, by considering how the mind-brain responds to (maps or "represents") the internal (visceral) and external environment.’

10 Pro Gwen view ‘mental = neural’ gives a framework for comparative studies – animal models because animal brains are very like human brains

11 the mainstream view would also make cross-organism comparisons difficult, since the kinds of mappings from sensory inputs to external environments differ vastly between, say, spiders and humans

12 all of mental functioning controlled by two bsasic processes sensory input + all the stuff in the middle; working memory control of behavior (motor control, action) no body, no objects facial expression controlled by the brain

13 Cognitive Paradigm Ontology Jessica “The mental function experimenters claim to be studying is not as important as the methods for studying it” Compare: doing biology is not as important as building the Ontology for Biomedical Investigations

14 Gwen’s paper: there is no consensus on how to define mental phenomena within a biological context (other than use of "operational,“ that is, experiment-specific, definitions). The Mind- Body question is usually avoided in standard textbooks on behavioral and biological psychology.


Download ppt "1 Shimon Edelman’s Riddle of Representation two humans, a monkey, and a robot are looking at a piece of cheese; what is common to the representational."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google