1. Informatics for Nanomanufacturing Data—Tools—Sharing Jan. 9, 2014: Report to Nano Working Group Mark Tuominen - National Nanomanufacturing Network (NNN) University of Massachusetts Amherst tuominen@physics.umass.edu 2013

2. Workshop Purpose Highlight activities in the “informatics + nanomanufacturing” space Learn of related projects and initiatives Identify opportunities, goals, gaps, and barriers What is compelling? — What data? What tools? Discuss specifics of next steps and build report (focused supplement to Nanoinformatics 2020 Roadmap)

3. Efficient Nanoinformatics Recognizes the Different Perspectives of Diverse Domains Physical Properties Biological Properties EHS Business Applications Development Modeling and Simulation Manufacturing Materials Engineering Education

4. Nanomanufacturing Informatics Streamlining product and manufacturing design Nanomanufacturing process-property relationships Nanomaterial properties data - with statistics and metadata Experts and facilities Suppliers of materials and tools Documentary standards Design tools Federation of data and information

5. Informatics for Nanomanufacturing: Some factors Informatics to speed development time and lower cost What has been developed and how mature is it? Help to identify what data, analysis, and testing has been done Some data can be public, others will necessarily be private Manufacturing requires satisfying multiple requirements Basic research experiments and Design-of-Experiment data First principles modeling and statistical modeling We need you to raise important issues. Past experiences help.

6. Identifying Opportunities and Needs Compelling data and tools Factors that make the data useful and searchable Sharing strategies Mapping terminologies and ontologies Mechanisms for strong industry involvement

7. Agenda (google “Nanoinformatics 2013”) Tuesday, October 15 University of Pennsylvania Welcome and Introduction to Informatics for Nanomanufacturing Mark Tuominen (National Nanomanufacturing Network) Regional, State, Local Initiatives and Mobilization of the Nanoinformatics Community Griff Kundahl (Nano Risk Assessment, Inc.) Nanomaterial Registry Kim Guzan (RTI International)

8. INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVES ManufacturingHUB and the National Digital Engineering and Manufacturing Consortium Steven Shade (Purdue University) An Informatics Approach to Materials Design Jason Poleski (Lockheed Martin) Advanced Software Tools for Nanoinformatics William Morris (Nano Data Search, Inc.) nanoWG Roundtable Discussion: Special Topics Frederick Klaessig (Pennsylvania Bio Nano Systems, LLC), Sharon Ku (Drexel University), Kim Guzan (RTI International), Martin Fritts (Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Contractor at NIST)

9. INFORMATICS Combining Heuristic and Physics-Based Methods for Predicting Nanocomposite Properties Curt Breneman (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute) Nanoinformatics for Scale-up Nanomanufacturing: Some Studies Qiang Huang (University of Southern California) GLOBONANO Patrick Herron (Duke University) Nanoinformatics: A Means to Increased Collaboration in Research, Translation and Commercialization Martin Fritts (Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Contractor at NIST )

10. INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS Describing Nanomaterials: Developing a multi-disciplinary Framework John Rumble (R&R Data Services), Steve Freiman (Freiman Consulting), and Clayton Teague (Independent Nanotechnology Consultant) InterNano – A Nanomanufacturing Information Resource Jeff Morse (National Nanomanufacturing Network) Discussion: Next Steps A few slide excerpts from the conference (see proceedings website) nanoinformatics.org

11. Some key points of discussion Stronger industry involvement is needed. There are existing proof cases! International dialog in nanoinformatics (eg China, etc) EU is looking for informatics solutions; has budgeted well 10X? Nanomanufacturing standards needs to be open source - InterNano & ISOconcept database Collaboration opportunities – help from agencies – low hanging fruit and beyond (eg, MGI/NKI cooperation) Contact the nanoWG to help translation PR is needed. Highlight aggressively and provide education. Make the clear value proposition for informatics – it’s ready and here NI has extensibility capabilities – faster development time, lower cost Further strengthen communication among nanoinformatics community(ies)