Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ESD. S40 Peer Assessment Prof. Dov Dori Dr. Niva Wengrowicz.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ESD. S40 Peer Assessment Prof. Dov Dori Dr. Niva Wengrowicz."— Presentation transcript:

1 ESD. S40 Peer Assessment Prof. Dov Dori Dr. Niva Wengrowicz

2 General The Peer Assessment task includes three sub tasks: – Quality first project – Quality assessment (fill out findings form) of the first project – Qualitysecond project – Quality assessment (fill out findings form) of the second project – Comparing – Comparing (fill out comparison form) between these two projects four categories The quality of the models and the comparison between them is done based on four categories: – Model clarity and understandability – Model completeness – Model correctness – Documentation

3 You will find a link to this comparison form in the course site. Here are the links for the findings forms

4 You will find a link to this comparison form in the course site. Here are the links for the findings forms You have to Fill out first findings page Fill out first findings page Fill out the second findings page Fill out the second findings page Fill out the comparison page Fill out the comparison page You have to Fill out first findings page Fill out first findings page Fill out the second findings page Fill out the second findings page Fill out the comparison page Fill out the comparison page

5 Findings form -Fill out for each project -Fill out for each project Findings form -Fill out for each project -Fill out for each project Category criteria Attention - You are writing feedback to your friends! You have to fill out all the criteria of each category You have to explain in the “Where & other comments” column what is the problem and where (in what figure & diagram) you find it in each criterion that is not graded as excellent. If you have an idea how to correct this - please advice. Attention - You are writing feedback to your friends! You have to fill out all the criteria of each category You have to explain in the “Where & other comments” column what is the problem and where (in what figure & diagram) you find it in each criterion that is not graded as excellent. If you have an idea how to correct this - please advice.

6 Do not forget to save the findings forms You can save it during work You can save it during work Findings form -Fill out for each project -Fill out for each project Findings form -Fill out for each project -Fill out for each project

7 Do not forget to save the findings forms You can continue saving it until the deadline of the task Findings form -Fill out for each project -Fill out for each project Findings form -Fill out for each project -Fill out for each project

8 Do not forget to fill out all the necessary comments.

9 Please grade on the basis of the finding pages You can not use the same grade twice Please grade on the basis of the finding pages You can not use the same grade twice Comparison form

10 Explain your grading. You do not have to repeat the finding page – you have to generalize, conclude and focus in the main issues only. You must prove your claims and conclusions with examples. Explain your grading. You do not have to repeat the finding page – you have to generalize, conclude and focus in the main issues only. You must prove your claims and conclusions with examples. Comparison form

11 2-3 sentences that generalize the main and important findings for each answer. 2-3 sentences that generalize the main and important findings for each answer. Add examples (diagram names + figure number) Add examples (diagram names + figure number) No need to repeat the findings – just conclude and give prominent examples. No need to repeat the findings – just conclude and give prominent examples. 2-3 sentences that generalize the main and important findings for each answer. 2-3 sentences that generalize the main and important findings for each answer. Add examples (diagram names + figure number) Add examples (diagram names + figure number) No need to repeat the findings – just conclude and give prominent examples. No need to repeat the findings – just conclude and give prominent examples. Comparison form

12 2-3 sentences that generalize the main and important findings for each answer. 2-3 sentences that generalize the main and important findings for each answer. Add examples (diagram names + figure number) Add examples (diagram names + figure number) No need to repeat the findings – just conclude and give prominent examples. No need to repeat the findings – just conclude and give prominent examples. 2-3 sentences that generalize the main and important findings for each answer. 2-3 sentences that generalize the main and important findings for each answer. Add examples (diagram names + figure number) Add examples (diagram names + figure number) No need to repeat the findings – just conclude and give prominent examples. No need to repeat the findings – just conclude and give prominent examples. Comparison form Example of what we expect:

13 Do not forget to save the comparison form Save and continue Save and continue

14 Answer these three questions Answer these three questions Give examples from your project and the two projects you assessed. Give examples from your project and the two projects you assessed. Answer these three questions Answer these three questions Give examples from your project and the two projects you assessed. Give examples from your project and the two projects you assessed. Comparison form – last section

15 Project submission May 18 2014 Peer assessment timeline May 27 2014 at 02 PMstart May 29 2014 at 06 PMend

16 Grading of Your Peer Assessment Task Your assessment will be graded by the course staff based on: – Your conclusions, claims, arguments and examples – Your ability to critique other projects This is an individual task. Accounts for 25% from total grade.

17


Download ppt "ESD. S40 Peer Assessment Prof. Dov Dori Dr. Niva Wengrowicz."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google