1. Architecting and Building KRA using Kuali Rice Terry Durkin, KRA DM/Lead Developer (Indiana University) Bryan Hutchinson, KRA DM/Lead Developer (Cornell)

2. Introduction KRA Background Rice Background How KRA uses Rice

3. About KRA Kuali Research Administration Enterprise level Research Administration Any proposal submitting institution Based on MIT’s Coeus –12 years of development/functionality –Used by 44 schools Release 1.0 - July 2008 –Proposal Development/Budget incl. Grants.gov S2S

4. Functional Roots - Coeus Cradle to Grave Research Administration –Proposals/Budgets –Awards Links to Financial System –Subcontracts –Negotiations –Compliance (human subjects)

5. About Kuali Rice Software Development Simplified –Unified development platform –Diverse functional requirements Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Integration of Kuali Applications Integration of existing Enterprise Applications Version 0.9.2 focuses on KRA requirements

6. Rice Components

7. Nervous System (KNS) Data Dictionary Document lifecycle Lookups UI Components Maintenance Documents Persistence

8. Workflow (KEW) Workflow as a Service Rules Approvals Actions Workgroups Integrated into KNS Documents Accessible from existing applications Embedded/External

9. Notifications (KEN) Notifications (not Actions) Multiple notification schemes –Email –Mobile Phone Priority Extensible

10. Service Bus (KSB) Service Integration Ease of Integration Provides opportunities for synergies between Kuali applications Framework for communicating with existing applications Multiple Connectors –Java –SOAP –Spring Integration –Etc…

11. Identity Management (KIM) New to the Rice party Application integration via KSB Institution and Application Extensible Can provide fine grained User/Role based AuthZ Integrate with existing AuthN infrastructure

12. Technical Roots KFS pioneered the KNS KEW based on IU Workflow

13. Moving Rice Functionality Forward Identifying KRA Requirements Integration Meetings –Technical representatives from Rice enabled applications –Review of Enhancement Proposals based on Functional Requirements Project Planning –Managing multiple release schedules

14. Functionally different from other Kuali Applications Analysis of Functional Differences Differences provide basis for Rice enhancements –Extend and customize functionality where possible –Focus on Extension, not Disruption –Add new tools to the Rice toolbox –More on this tomorrow!

15. Tool Differences from KFS Same basic building blocks (Kuali stack) Rice allows us to make our own choices about development –Maven, not Ant –Jetty, not Tomcat (Development) –HTMLUnit Tests –Bamboo, not Anthill Allows execution of Bamboo native plugins and Maven plugins

16. KRA In Depth This is nice… but… How does KRA use Rice?

17. KRA Building Blocks Kuali Toolbox –Open Source Tools Struts - UI OJB - Persistence Spring - Services –Rice builds upon and extends functionality Struts - Mitigates common issues (POJO forms, Formatting,…) OJB - DAO w/ Object Hierarchy; No custom code for POJO persistence

18. KRA Architecture

20. Documents - Size KRA: Few, large, complex KFS: Many, small, still complex KNS –Data Dictionary - Specify multiple pages –Web Flow - Allow consistent behavior while navigating between multiple pages in arbitrary order –Document interaction - Document is saved/loaded –Rules - Events/Rules can be specified in code and extended

21. Documents - Size

23. proposal Proposal keyPersonnel Key Personnel …snip… actions Actions auditMode Audit Mode

24. Documents - Web Scope KRA: Large Documents, Session based KFS: Currently Request based KNS –Mitigate issues with Session based persistence (multiple browsers, etc…) –Eases development/maintenance (hiddens, load-save-load anti-pattern)

25. Documents - Web Scope <action path="/proposalDevelopment*" name="ProposalDevelopmentForm" validate="true” attribute="KualiForm" input="/WEB-INF/jsp/ProposalDevelopment{1}.jsp" scope="request" parameter="methodToCall" type="org.kuali.kra.proposaldevelopment.web.struts.action.ProposalDevelopment{1}Action"> public class ProposalDevelopmentDocument extends ResearchDocumentBase implements Copyable, SessionDocument {... }

26. Documents - Locking KRA: Pessimistic Locking, Long lasting docs, Session Based, Functional Areas KFS: Optimistic Locking, short lived docs KNS (enhancement pending) –Centralized locking mechanism –Document Authorizer classes –Provide two layers of locking if desired

27. Documents - Versioning KRA: Many documents require versioning KFS: Versioning not required in general (PurAp docs do version) KNS (enhancement pending) –Support optional versioning of documents –Configuration option –Little additional code required –New Version created by user request or programmatically

28. Custom Attributes KRA: Transactional Documents, table based, runtime KFS: Reference Data, code based KNS (KRA model enhancement pending) –Support both models –UI: Integrated custom tag –Accessible for Lookups, Routing, Reporting –Strongly typed for validation

29. Custom Attributes

31. User Roles; AuthZ KRA: User/Role based; Integrated into Unit Hierarchy; Code checks Rights KFS: Workgroup based KIM –Manage people/workgroups –Qualified Roles allow integration with Unit Hierarchy KNS –Document Authorizer Class

32. People KRA: Research System required data KFS: Financial System required data KIM –Define a ‘Person’ generically –Institution specific attributes –Application specific attributes

33. KIM https://test.kuali.org/confluence/x/Kqg

34. Workflow KRA: Based on Coeus’ routing, Units define custom rules and responsibilities KFS: Account, Unit based; Rules defined for the entire document KEW –Flexible routing allows document/node based workflow (and more)

35. More… KSB –Units/Organizations –People –Validation KRA - Grants.gov –Kuali Lookupable Interface for cohesive interface –Web Service

36. Synergies and Moving Forward KRA –Relies on Rice to provide functionality Rice –Greater richness of functionality as KRA requirements are integrated Future Rice Enabled Applications –More choices, more functionality, more features

37. Future of KRA Release 1.0 - July 2008 –Proposal Development –Budget –Grants.gov S2S Release 2.0 - 2009 –IRB –Awards Release 3.0, 4.0 –Full functionality of Coeus

38. Wrap-up Final Thoughts Questions

39. Other Kuali Days Sessions of Interest Rice Sessions KRA/Coeus Joint Session

40. Contact http://www.kuali.org/communities/kra/ https://test.kuali.org/mocks/kra-coeus-dev/proposal.html Terry Durkin - tdurkin@indiana.edutdurkin@indiana.edu Bryan Hutchinson - bh79@cornell.edubh79@cornell.edu Andrew Slusar - as833@cornell.eduas833@cornell.edu