Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Cervical Cancer Screening 2010 and PID in pregnancy

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Cervical Cancer Screening 2010 and PID in pregnancy"— Presentation transcript:

1 Cervical Cancer Screening 2010 and PID in pregnancy
Delese LaCour M.D. Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology Johns Hopkins Community Physicians January 29, 2010

2

3 Cervical Cancer Screening
1943 Papanicolaou and Trout published their monograph on the use of vaginal and cervical cytology as a screening tool for cervical neoplasm The incidence of cervical cancer has been reduced by 50% Cervical cancer has dropped from the #2 female cancer deaths to the 13th

4 Types of Cervical Cancer
Squamous cell Approximately 80-90% of cervical cancers Adenocarcinoma 10% Clear cell cervical cancer Mucinous adenocarcinoma Adenosquamous Glassy cell carcinoma Stromal sarcoma Sarcoma botryoides Leiomyosarcoma Lymphoma Small cell cervical cancer Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the cervix

5 Technique for cervical cancer screening

6 Collection Methods for Pap Smear

7 Collection Methods for Pap Smear

8 Bethesda System 2001 SPECIMEN ADEQUACY Satisfactory for evaluation (note presence/absence of endocervical/ transformation zone component) Unsatisfactory for evaluation  Specimen rejected/not processed  Specimen processed and examined, but unsatisfactory for evaluation of epithelial abnormality because GENERAL CATEGORIZATION (Optional) Negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy Epithelial cell abnormality INTERPRETATION/RESULT Negative for Intraepithelial Lesion or Malignancy  Organisms   Trichomonas vaginalis ,   Fungal oganisms consistent with Candida species   Shift in flora suggestive of bacterial vaginosis   Bacteria consistent with Actinomyces species   Cellular changes consistent with herpes simplex virus  Other non-neoplastic findings   Reactive cellular changes associated with    inflammation    radiation    intrauterine contraceptive device   Glandular cells status posthysterectomy   Atrophy

9 Bethesda System 2001 Epithelial Cell Abnormalities  Squamous cell   Atypical squamous cells (ASC)    of undetermined significance (ASC-US)    cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H)   Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL)    encompassing: human papillomavirus/mild dysplasia/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1   High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL)    moderate and severe dysplasia, carcinoma in situ; CIN 2 and CIN 3  Squamous cell carcinoma  Glandular cell   Atypical glandular cells (AGC)   Atypical glandular cells, favor neoplastic   Endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)   Adenocarcinoma

10

11

12 Cervical cancer screening
Cervical cancer screening should begin at age 21 A) High prevalence of HPV infection in teenagers B) Most dysplasia regresses spontaneously in adolescents C) Invasive cervical cancer is rare in those younger than 21 D) Potential for adverse effects of side effects American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology Practice Bulletin No 109, Dec 2009

13 High prevalence of HPV infection in teenagers

14 1/Castle/p.225/ col 1/¶ 3 1/Castle/p.225/ col 1/¶ 3 1/Castle/p.225/ col 1/¶ 3 2/Sellors/Ch 1/p.8/ ¶ 1 2/Sellors/Ch 1/p.5/ ¶ 4 3/Rager/p.469/col 1/¶ 1 1/Castle/p.225/ col 1/¶ 3

15

16

17

18

19 Most dysplasia regresses spontaneously in adolescents
A prospective study of 187 women aged years old found that LSIL had reverted to negative in 61% after 1 year and 91% after 3 years Only 3% progressed to CIN 3 Two smaller studies of adolescent females with biopsy confirmed CIN 2 showed 65-75% regression after 18 months and 36 months ACOG practice bulletin 2009

20

21

22

23 Invasive cervical cancer is rare in those younger than 21
Only 0.1 % of cervical cancers occur before age 21 National data from 1998 through 2003 identified 14 cases of invasive cancer /year in those ages SEER incidence rate of 1-2 cases per 1,000,000 females aged (Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results)

24

25

26

27 Potential for adverse effects of side effects
Significantly increased risk of : Preterm birth Low birth weight Neonatal intensive care admissions For every 18 LEEPs preformed there will be an additional preterm birth Suh-Burgmann B and Kinney W 2006 ASCCP Vol 10 , Issue 2,2006

28 Management of LGSIL

29 Abnormal Pap ASCUS-H

30 Management of HGSIL

31 Abnormal Pap CIN1

32 Abnormal Pap CIN 2-3

33 How often to screen Frequency of cervical cytology screening
Every 2 years for women aged 21-29 Women aged 30 or older with three consecutive negative pap smears can be followed every three years More frequent screening for HIV infected women Immunosuppressed women Women exposed to DES Women with previously treated CIN2, CIN 3 , or cancer

34 How often to screen Frequency
Women with HIV should be screened every 6 months in the first year of diagnosis, then every year Women treated in the past for CIN2, CIN3, or cancer are at risk for 20 years for recurrence or persistence, annual screening

35 Special Notes The frequency of those with same sex partners
Penetrative sex at an early age Same screening in those who have been vaccinated against HPV ( ACOG press release 11/09)

36

37 Pelvic Inflammatory disease in pregnancy
A 23 year old P2032 at 8 weeks and 6 /7 days presents to ER with complaint of nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain Past Medical history : NC Past Surgical history : TAB x 3 Social history : positive marijuana use Gyn/OB history: new partner, history of Chlamydia, Trich, PID in past, SVD times two Vitals , RR 20, P 65, BP 97/59 PE: moderate distress Abdomen soft, no rebound or guarding, Pelvic: Yellow vaginal discharge, cervical motion tenderness Sonogram: 8 week fetus with fetal HMS

38 Pelvic Inflammatory disease in pregnancy
Labs: WBC 4.9, Hct 39.9, Positive culture for chlamydia, Trich on wet prep Hospital course: pt was admitted with diagnosis of PID in pregnancy, Treated 48 hours with IV Gentamycin and Clindamycin , po Azithomycin Discharge Home with Clindamycin for ten days

39 Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
Most of the times multi-organism Can range from endometritis to pelvic abcesses 300,000 cases per year 16-20% in Adolescents Clinical diagnosis overestimated and difficult

40 Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
Empiric treatment warranted if suspected because of long term effects if untreated Begin treatment if sexually active and Uterine tenderness Adnexal tenderness Cervical motion tenderness (CMT)

41 Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
Additional Criteria: Temp > 101 F (38.3 C) Mucopurulent cervical discharge WBC on microscopy Increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate Increased C-reactive protein Positive culture for N. gonorrhea or Chlamydia

42

43 Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
Treat in hospital if: Surgical emergency cannot be excluded Pregnancy (rare 1: 1000 to 1:25000) No initial clinical response Does not tolerate PO Severe illness Tubo-Ovarian abscess

44 Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
Rx. Outpatient: A: Ofloxacin 400 mg PO BID X 14 days OR Levofloxacin 500 mg PO QD X 14 days +/- Metronidazole 500 mg PO BID X 14 days B: Ceftriaxone 250 mg IM X 1 dose OR Cefoxitin 2 g IM X 1 dose + Probenecid 1 g PO OR Other third generation cephalosporin Plus Doxycycline 100 mg PO BID X 14 days CDC STD treatment guidelines

45 Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
In House A: Cefotetan 2 g IV Q 12 OR Cefoxitin 2 g IV Q 6H Plus Doxycycline 100 mg IV or PO Q12 H B: Clindamycin 900 mg IV q8h Plus Gentamicin 2mg/kg loading f/u 1.5 mg/kg Q8H C: Ofloxacin 400 mg IV Q6h or Levofloxacin 500 mg QD +/- Metronidazole 500 mg IV Q8H or Unasyn 3 g IV Q6H Plus Doxycycline 100 mg PO IV Q12H CDC STD treatment guidelines

46 Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
Pregnancy: Multiple reports in the literature (1:1000-1:25000) Easily confused with ectopic pregnancy Associated with fetal wastage and poor outcomes Etiology confusing: Sperm carrying bacteria? Infection prior to 12 weeks and membrane apposition? Reactivation of latent disease? Hematogenous or Lymphatic spread? Lara-Torre E et al JRM 2002;47:959-61

47 Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
Pregnancy (cont): Aggressive antibiotic treatment warranted prior to uterine evacuation Conservative treatment may maintain pregnancy to term Delay in diagnosis because of pregnancy may worsen outcomes Decrease immune response in pregnancy may worsen presentation and progression

48


Download ppt "Cervical Cancer Screening 2010 and PID in pregnancy"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google