1. Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Workshop General Education Unit October 3, 2003 Val Whittlesey, Bill Hill, & Ed Rugg Assurance of Learning Council

2. Goals for an Assessment Plan To articulate as the KSU General Education Unit what the expected goals and outcomes are for students who complete the General Education program To evaluate whether we are accomplishing these goals through the general education program as a whole and within courses that address specific outcomes

3. Goals for an Assessment Plan To use assessment data to guide improvements/enhancements to the general education curriculum and instruction To report to external stakeholders [students, employers, the Board of Regents, accreditation agencies (e.g., SACS)]

4. SACS Reaccreditation Requirements Comprehensive Standard #1 states that “an educational program for which academic credit is awarded should establish and evaluate learning outcomes” Core Requirement #15 requires “the identification of expected competencies in the undergraduate general education program and evidence that graduates have attained those competencies”

5. “Assessment should be first and foremost about improving student learning and secondarily about determining accountability for the quality of learning produced.” Angelo, 1999 Student Learning is Job 1

6. Assessment Should be Student-Centered “Student’s academic, attitudinal, and behavioral outcomes are the primary source of assessment data … (and) provide information about the effectiveness of the curriculum, advising, faculty development, ethnic diversity goals, and external linkages with other segments of education.” Halpern et al., pp. 24-25

7. Last Spring’s Work Formulation of the Assurance of Learning Council Council developed eight elements for an effective assessment plan Establishment of a link on the KSU Institutional Effectiveness website on “Assessing Student Outcomes” Held an Assurance of Learning Workshop with a group of faculty from the College of Science & Mathematics

8. Elements of an Effective Assessment Plan 1.Articulating Student Learning Outcomes 2.Connecting the Outcomes to the Program Requirements 3.Connecting Outcomes with Assessment Methods 4.Articulating your Expected Results with Respect to the Outcomes 5.Articulating the Research/Assessment Plan for Gathering and Collecting the Data 6.Collecting & Analyzing the Data 7.Comparing Actual Results with Expected Results 8.Using Results for Improvement

9. Fall Semester Assurance of Learning (AOL) Foci Focus on Element 1- Articulating Student Learning Outcomes Focus on Element 2- Connecting Outcomes to the Program Requirements Note. Some programs may want to complete additional elements.

10. Fall Assurance of Learning (AOL) Activities Dissemination of Guidelines for Reporting Elements 1 & 2 of the Assurance of Learning Report AOL Workshops with Each College, General Education, & University Studies AOL Brown Bag Sessions Reports of Elements 1 & 2 of the AOL Reports due Dec. 31 Optional Early Submission of Reports of Elements 1 & 2 of the AOL Reports is Nov. 7 Academic Affairs/CETL Assessment Showcase during Spring semester of 2004

11. General Education Assurance of Learning Assessment Student learning outcomes assessment in general education is similar to assessing a major program Element 1- General and specific learning outcomes for the general education program must be specified Element 2- The learning outcomes for the program must be linked to general education courses and other requirements

12. Step 1- Articulating Student Learning Outcomes There are three types of learning outcomes –Knowledge –Skills/Proficiencies –Attitudinally-Based

13. Step 1- Articulating Student Learning Outcomes There are two levels of specificity at the program level (the same is true at the course level) –Broad learning outcomes –Specific learning outcomes

14. Step 1- Articulating Student Learning Outcomes The use of national trends in general education is a place to start when developing outcomes for an institution. 1) Strong Foundations: Twelve Principles of Effective General Education Programs by the American Association of Colleges & Universities 2) Common Student Learning Outcomes for the Core Curriculum for the University System of Georgia 3) Speaking and Listening Competencies by the National Communication Association 4) Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition by the Writing Program Administration

15. Step 1- Articulating Student Learning Outcomes State Outcomes in measurable terms so that it can be determined if achievement of the learning outcomes has been achieved. –Although broad outcomes can be stated in measurable terms they are still difficult to assess because of their breath. Therefore, because specific outcomes should be the primary focus of assessment, they must be measurable.

16. Step 1- Articulating Student Learning Outcomes Applying Bloom’s taxonomy (1956) –Original taxonomy divides thinking skills into lower and higher level knowledge, skills, and attitudes. –Anderson and Krathwohl (2001) have adapted Bloom’s model to more outcome- oriented, contemporary language.Anderson and Krathwohl (2001) have adapted Bloom’s model to more outcome- oriented, contemporary language. –Clark (2002) shows how Bloom’s work can be used to develop specific learning outcomes.

18. Common Student Learning Outcomes for the Core Curriculum for the University System of Georgia

19. USG General Education Guidelines Broad Learning Outcome: Goal 1. Communication Skills Students will demonstrate oral and written communication skills that will be characterized by clarity, critical analysis, logic, coherence, persuasion, precision, and rhetorical awareness.

20. Example of Communications Specific Outcomes Assimilate, analyze, and present in oral and written forms, a body of information Communicate in standard English for academic and professional contexts Communicate in various modes and media, including the proper use of technology Compose effective written materials for various academic and professional contexts

21. An Example of Learning Outcomes for an Undergraduate Program that Builds on General Education Two Categories of Learning Outcomes

22. National Guidelines for Psychology Category One- Knowledge, Skills, and Values Consistent with the Science and Application of Psychology Activities that provide hallmarks of psychology education; responsibility for development in and assessment of these areas rests primarily with the psychology faculty through coursework, advising, etc.

23. Psychology Broad Outcomes Outcomes for Category 1: Consistent with the Science and Application of Psychology -Goal 1: Knowledge Base of Psychology -Goal 2: Research Methods in Psychology -Goal 3: Critical Thinking Skills in Psychology -Goal 4: Application in Psychology -Goal 5: Values in Psychology

24. National Guidelines for Psychology Category Two- Knowledge, Skills, and Values Consistent with Liberal Arts Education that are Further Developed in Psychology Activities that are usually part of a general education program; Responsibility for development in and assessment of achievement in these areas tends to be shared across a broad range of disciplines; the psychology program can expand upon these general education goals in significant ways

25. Psychology Broad Outcomes Outcomes for Category 2: Consistent with Liberal Arts Education that are Further Developed in Psychology –Goal 6: Information and Technological Literacy –Goal 7: Communication Skills –Goal 8: Sociocultural and International Awareness –Goal 9: Personal Development –Goal 10: Career Planning and Development

26. Psychology Specific Outcome for Communication Skills Goal 7: Communication Skills Students will be able to communicate effectively in a variety of formats.

27. Psychology Specific Outcome for Communication Skills 7.1 Demonstrate effective writing skills in various formats (e.g., essays, correspondence, technical papers, note taking), and for various purposes (e.g., informing, defending, explaining, persuading, arguing, teaching). a)Demonstrate professional writing conventions (e.g., grammar, audience awareness, formality). b)Use APA style effectively in empirically-based reports, literature reviews, and theoretical papers.

28. Psychology Specific Outcome for Communication Skills 7.2 Demonstrate effective oral communication skills in various formats (e.g., group discussion, debate, lectures) and for various purposes (e.g., informing, defending, persuading, arguing, teaching).

29. Psychology Specific Outcome for Communication Skills 7.3Exhibit quantitative literacy. a)Apply basic mathematical concepts and operations to support measurement strategies. b)Use relevant probability and statistical analyses to facilitate interpretation of measurements. c)Articulate clear and appropriate rationale for choice of information conveyed in charts, tables, figures, and graphs. d)Interpret quantitative visual aids accurately, including showing vigilance about misuse or misrepresentation of quantitative information.

30. Psychology Specific Outcome for Communication Skills 7.4 Demonstrate effective interpersonal communication skills. a)Listen accurately and actively. b)Use psychological concepts and theory to understand interactions with others. c)Identify the impact or potential impact of their behaviors on others. d)Articulate ideas thoughtfully and purposefully. e)Use appropriately worded questions to improve interpersonal understanding. f)Attend to nonverbal behavior and evaluate its meaning in the communications context. g)Adapt communication style to accommodate diverse audiences. h)Provide constructive feedback to colleagues in oral and written formats.

31. Psychology Specific Outcome for Communication Skills 7.5 Exhibit the ability to collaborate effectively. a)Work with groups to complete projects within reasonable timeframes. b)Solicit and integrate diverse viewpoints. c)Manage conflicts appropriately and ethically. d)Develop relevant workplace skills: mentoring, interviewing, and crisis management.

32. Another Example of Learning Outcomes for an Undergraduate Program that Builds on General Education

33. KSU Nursing Broad Outcomes Goal 3. Demonstrate Critical Thinking- Students will demonstrate critical thinking as a basis for practice, clinical judgment, and ethics, and as a foundation for investigation of health care issues, and the application of the results of research to the provision of therapeutic client care Goal 4. Communicate Effectively- Students will communicate effectively in written and spoken form with clients, colleagues and interdisciplinary health team members through the use of multiple expressive caring modes and through the use of advanced information and communication technologies

34. KSU Nursing Broad Outcomes Goal 8. Assume Responsibility- Students will assume responsibility and accountability for personal and professional behavior, ethical practice and client advocacy, especially for vulnerable clients

35. Format for Listing of General and Specific Learning Outcomes (SLO) General SLO (Identify Knowledge, Skill, or Attitude) Specific SLO (Identify Knowledge, Skill, or Attitude) Note. List all General and Specific SLOs for the General Education program

36. Self-Evaluation Format for Articulating SLOs Overall Self-Evaluation Exemplary Strong Satisfactory Weak Notably Deficient Indicators A) Knowledge, Skill, Attitude Balance B) Differentiation of General & Specific SLOs C) Compliance with Disciplinary Conventions D) Building Upon Prior Learning (Precollege) E) Lower-Order & Higher-Order Thinking F) Providing a Foundation for the Upper Division Programs

37. Group Exercise #1 Looking for the Balance of Knowledges, Skills, and Attitudes in the USG’s Common Student Learning Outcomes for the Core Curriculum

38. Group Exercise #2 Critiquing the Wording and Differentiating of the USG’s General and Specific Common Learning Outcomes for General Education

39. Step 2 Connecting Outcomes to the General Education Program Requirements The course and program requirements for general education are designed for student attainment of the knowledge, skills, and attitudes important to the general education experience.

40. Listing Course & General Education Requirements Creating an inventory of key course and general education program requirements is an important step in ensuring a strong linkage between the program’s requirements and the learning outcomes.

41. Format for Listing of Required Course and Program Requirements Required General Education Course or Program Requirement Note. The General Education unit should list all requirements for general education program.

42. Linking of Course & Program Requirements to GSLOs & SSLOs Using the inventory of course and program requirements, general and specific SLOs should be linked to general education course and program requirements that facilitate their attainment. In addition, each linked general education course or program requirement should include a statement on how it contributes to attainment of the specific SLO.

43. Format for Linking Course & Program Requirements to GSLOs and SSLOs General SLO Specific SLO Course/ Program Requirement(s) Contributing to Attainment of SSLO ____________________ Note. List all GSLOs and SSLOs for the program. Statement of How the Requirement(s) Contribute to Attainment of the SSLO ______________________ Note. List all Course & Program Reqs. that Contribute to Attainment of the SSLO.

44. Self-Evaluation Format for Course and Program Requirements Overall Self-Evaluation Exemplary Strong Satisfactory Weak Notably Deficient Indicators A) A Linkage of All Requirements to SLOs B) Reinforcing SLOs through Multiple Program Requirements

45. Self-Evaluation Format for Course and Program Requirements (cont.) Indicators C) Building on the Pre- College Experience D) Strength of the General Education Area A & SLO Linkage Indicators E) Strength of the General Education Area B & SLO Linkage F) Strength of the General Education Area C & SLO Linkage

46. Self-Evaluation Format for Course and Program Requirements (cont.) Indicators G) Strength of the General Education Area D & SLO Linkage H) Strength of the General Education Area E & SLO Linkage I) SLO Linkage with KSU Upper Division Degree Programs

47. Assessment as Research & Scholarship Assessment in the discipline is an opportunity to engage in applied scholarship. Assessment is also the scholarship of teaching and learning. Multiple venues exist to present and publish this scholarship.

48. Where Do You Go from Here? Involve the faculty!! Allow sufficient time to discuss and agree upon learning outcomes. See it as a constantly changing and evolving process. It NEVER ends!!! Provide resources and time to the departmental faculty leading the effort. Tie this to scholarship.

49. Role of the Assurance of Learning Council Review and provide feedback of program assessment efforts To provide an external review on the Assurance of Learning process to ensure improvement of student learning at the institutional level

50. Questions & Comments?