1. Social Theories Anthropology and Sociology

2. Anthropological Theories Unilineal Evolution (1850s –1900s)

3. 3 Context for Unilineal Evolution 19 th Century: Colonialism – economic & political domination Transfer of wealth to Europe Increasing Racism

4. 4 Religion 3 Orientations 1. Polygenists: Separate creations Races are distinct species 2. Monogenists: One creation Biblical interpretation All races with ability to progress “White Man’s Burden” 3. Degeneration: Single creation Regression after creation

5. Separate Creations Polygenists Can’t Achieve Civilization Monogenists Capable of Advancement

6. Punishment for Falling from Perfection Degenerationists

7. 7 Unilineal Evolution Process by which new cultural forms emerge out of older ones Each Society believed to PROGRESS through the same stages of development, from SAVAGERY to BARBARISM to CIVILIZATION Only Europeans had reached civilization

8. 8 Civilization Barbarism Savagery P R O G R E S S

9. 9 Basis for Unilineal Evolution Application of biological evolution to culture Interest in general laws, not history Ranking societies on a scale of progress Armchair anthropologists

10. Armchair Anthropologists 19th century Evolutionists collected data from missionaries and traders Rarely traveled to societies they were studying Organized second hand data and applied general theory to all societies Since Western societies had most advanced technology, they put those societies at the highest rank of civilization

11. 19 th century Evolutionists contributed to anthropology: By providing first systematic methods for explaining human societies Insightful about technological aspect of societies Logical progression from simple tools to complex technology

12. 12 Historical Particularism Early 20 th C. paradigm change Professionalization of anthropology Represents a reaction against unilineal evolution Division between British & American anthropology Omnibus approach

13. 13 Assumptions of Historical Particularism Rejects: General laws Rankings (on a scale) “Progress” No simple or complex societies, only different societies Not Culture, but cultures Culture, not race, determines behavior Methodological rigor Franz Boas

14. 14 Culture & Personality (Psychological Anthropology) 1930-50s – Students of Boas Borrowed from psychology Focus on the individual as the bearer of culture Idealist approach: Interest in personality & how individuals thought, felt Studied process of enculturation, especially child development Mead Benedict

15. European Ethnocentrism

16. Timeline of European Religions

17. Diffusionism During late 19 th and early 20 th centuries Diffusionists addressed cultural differences suggesting that humans were essentially uninventive Cultural features developed in one or several parts of the world and Spread, through the process of diffusion, to other cultures

18. Diffusionists All societies change as a result of cultural borrowing Use deductive approach: General theory of diffusion applied to explain specific cases of cultural diversity Diffusionism overemphasized the essentially valid idea of diffusion

19. Examples of Cultural Diffusion The The Silk Road

20. Functionalism No matter how bizarre a cultural item might at first appear, it had a meaning Performed some useful function Well-being of individual or society Researcher to become immersed in culture and language to identify functions

21. Functionalism The functionalist approach is based on two fundamental principles: 1.Universal Functions Every part of a culture has a function 2.Functional Unity A culture is an integrated whole composed of a number of interrelated parts; A change in one part of the culture is likely to produce change in other parts

22. British Functionalism Society consists of institutions (or structures, systems) that serve vital purposes for people Functionalists not interested in evolution of societies But relationship among different systems, or structures, and How these structures serve society or individual

23. Structural functionalism – A.R. Radcliffe-Brown Focused on how societal structures function to maintain harmony in society. Economic, social, political, and religious institutions (or systems) integrate society as a whole Perpetuate survival of society Anthropology should not focus on individual actions, but focus on governing structures. Societal norms (which guide behavior) are window into those structures; Function to reduce tension & conflict, promote stability, and thus uphold the social structure.

24. A.R. Radcliffe-Brown Because of emphasis on social functions rather than individual functions Radcliffe-Brown’s theory has taken the name STRUCTURAL FUNCTIONALISM

25. Psychological Functionalism Bronislaw Malinowski How elements of society function to meet needs of individual Identified three basic types of needs: 1) Biological (food, sex); 2) Instrumental (protection, education, social control) and 3) Integrative (a common worldview). People developed institutions (or patterned ways of behaving) Examples: Religion, kinship systems Use of magic in situations where humans have no control over circumstances  weather, illness, death

26. French Structuralism Theoretical orientation holding that cultures are the product of unconscious processes of the human mind Claude Levi-Strauss

27. French Structuralism Rather than examining attitudes, values and beliefs, Structuralists concentrate on what happens at the unconscious level The human mind categorizes phenomena in terms of binary oppositions.

28. French Structuralism Binary opposites examples: hot-cold male-female old-young night-day right-left us-them These dichotomies give shape to culture.

29. Cultural Materialism Cultural systems are most influenced by such material things as natural resources and technology Marvin Harris

30. Cultural Materialism Key determinants in sociocultural evolution: Technology Environment Energy Food Economy Harris believes that material needs (food, technology, clothing, shelter) Are more important than abstract (values, ideas, religion) in determining cultural behavior Example: (Much criticism of this model.) Aztec human sacrifice and cannibalism To Aztecs: A religious ritual To Harris: Protein deficiency  craving for meat Insufficient protein in the Aztec environment  need for protein  human sacrifice & cannibalism

31. Sociological Theories Structural-Functionalism Conflict theory Symbolic Interactionism

32. Structural–Functional Paradigm Macro-level: Broad patterns that shape society as a whole Society as complex system: Parts work together to promote solidarity and stability Social structure = Relatively stable patterns of social behavior Social function=Consequences for operation of society as a whole

33. Structural-Functionalism Society is like human body or other living organism Each part of society contributes to the whole To maintain social stability

34. Founders of Functionalism August Comte (1798-1857) Herbert Spencer (1820-1903) Émile Durkheim (1858-1917)

35. Social-Conflict Macro theory Inequality generates conflict and social change Power Society structured to benefit a few at expense of majority Race, sex, class, and age Dominant group vs. minority group

36. Founders: Social-Conflict Theory Karl Marx Social class inequality and social conflict W.E.B. DuBois Race major problem for United States in 20 th c. Harriet Martineau Position of women and their education Jane Addams Hull House for immigrants

37. Symbolic Interactionism Micro-level Focus on social interactions Use symbols with shared meanings

38. Symbolic Interactionism Society Shared reality that people construct as they interact Meaning people attach to behavior Self Social creation of the self Interaction

39. Founders: Symbolic-Interactionism Max Weber Intersubjective understanding George Herbert Mead Mind, self, and society Erving Goffman Dramaturgical analysis