1. ANALYZING THE LANDSCAPE (TERRAIN) FOR FACULTY DEVELOPMENT THROUGH RESEARCH Elizabeth Noel, Ph.D. Associate V.P. for Research Laurette Blakey Foster, Ed.D. Director, Center for Teaching Excellence Prairie View A&M University

2. Landscapes Past and Present Historical Landscapes Bricks – and - Mortar Residential geographically limited campuses Targeted clientele Faculty longevity Limited research production Current Landscapes On-line programs Hybridized classes (combination of online and in-class instruction) Group vs Individual Project-Based Learning Global clientele Targeted research

3. Faculty Profile Tenured(31%) Professor43% Assoc. Prof.56% Asst. Prof. - Instructor - Tenure Track(14%) Professor1% Assoc. Prof.9% Asst. Prof.85% Instructor1%

4. Faculty Profile, Cont. Ethnic Origin Black/Non-Hispanic 58 White/Non-Hispanic 19 Asian/Pacific Islander 14 Hispanic 4 International 3 American Indian/ Alaskan Native 0 Multiracial 0 Unknown 0 Gender Male 57% Tenured 75% Female 43% Tenured 25%

5. Research Profile Research Awards Federal ($112,886,486) State of Texas ($42,013,961) Public Sector ($8,215,196) Private Sector ($3,340,568) Research Expenditures 2010 ($12,138,770) 2011 ($14,485,193) 2012 ($ 14,195,970) 2013 ($ 12,161,310) 2014 ($ 11,943,086)

6. Title III Partnership Title III Center for Teaching Excellence Improvement in Training of Faculty for Best Practices in Teaching/Learning Increase number of successful practice works submitted by faculty for publication Office for Research Improvement in Training for grant writing and Submission by Faculty Increase in the number/dollar value of funded Research

7. Institutional Analysis S.W.O.T. StrengthsWeaknessesOpportunitiesThreats

8. What is the framework for an institutional analysis? 1. Using the SWOT analysis as your framework and the examples below, develop a SWOT analysis for your home institution. 2. Please limit your analysis to faculty and research development.

9. S.W.O.T. Analysis Sample Academic Programs and Faculty Development StrengthsWeaknessesOpportunitiesThreats Changing Clientele demographics Faculty lack substantive and formative experiences in the instructional techniques that contribute to quality teaching and learning Strengthen faculty training and development programs – quantity and quality Service demands from a broader and more diverse clientele with varied learning style strengths, weaknesses, needs

10. S.W.O.T. Analysis Sample Form Academic Programs and Faculty Development cont. StrengthsWeaknessesOpportunitiesThreats

11. S.W.O.T. Analysis Sample Research Programs and Faculty Development StrengthsWeaknessesOpportunitiesThreats Collaboration - faculty enhance knowledge and skills through proposal development and research production Limited number of faculty required to participate in documentation of research production Increased production yields additional support for research from ALL sources Decreased production yields a reduction in funding support for research and limitations in program quality

12. S.W.O.T Analysis Form Research Programs and Faculty Development StrengthsWeaknessesOpportunitiesThreats

13. S.W.O.T. Analysis Sample Service and Faculty Development StrengthsWeaknessesOpportunitiesThreats Technology infusion Insufficient resources to maintain technology infrastructure beyond minimum requirements Expanded access to a global audience through first-class technology infusion Rising cost for controlling security breaches and for personnel training

14. S.W.O.T. Analysis Form Service and Faculty Development StrengthsWeaknessesOpportunitiesThreats

15. Contact Information Elizabeth N. Noel Office for Research ennoel@pvamu.edu 936.261.1589 Laurette Blakey Foster Center for Teaching Excellence lbfoster@pvamu.edu 936.261.3533