1. Folashade Momodu

3.  Researched the feasibility of creating a sobriety checkpoint program in Anchorage, Alaska  Researched the statistics and costs of driving under the influence in Anchorage ◦ 5,888 DUIs in 2008 ◦ 22 fatal car accidents ◦ $130 billion dollars a year spent on alcohol related crashes

4.  Conducted secondary research on the effectiveness of sobriety checkpoints  Researched driving records through Alaska Division for Motor Vehicles  Distributed and studied a questionaire regarding the problem of alcohol in Anchorage

5.  Will the State of Alaska be able to fund this program?  Will this program decrease DUI’s?  Will this program decrease alcohol related accidents?

6. Affordability Each checkpoint would save up to $50,000 a year. For every dollar invested, six to 23 dollars is proven to be saved.

7.  The figure above shows that Alaskans support having a sobriety checkpoint program. When surveyed, 76% of respondents said that they would vote in favor for a sobriety checkpoint program in Anchorage, Alaska.

8. Lower DUIs  Checkpoints deter people from drinking and driving because their location is viewable by the public  Checkpoints are proven to lower DUIs by 20 percent

10. Lower alcohol related accidents They effectively lower the number of alcohol related accidents. Sobriety checkpoints can cut the number of alcohol-related accidents by up to 20 percent.

11.  The State of Alaska would benefit from a sobriety checkpoint program.  The program would be affordable.  The program would lower DUI citations  Alcohol related accidents will decrease.  Other States have used and benefited from this program.  Other States have saved money.  The streets of Anchorage would be safer.

12.  a sobriety checkpoint program be implemented in Anchorage, Alaska  the program be observed for at least a first.  there be a year-end review to reevaluate the benefits of this program