1. CURRENT STATE NARRATIVE… Knight Management Center Lecture Hall

3. STAKEHOLDERS GSB Representative: Kathleen Cavanaugh -Faculty & Staff -GSB Students Capital Planning and Mgmt.: Tom Bauer - General Stanford Population GSB IT/Audio Visual Team Facilities Management DESIGNERS Architect: Boora Architects - Arup -Structural -Mechanical -Electrical -Plumbing -Acoustics -Fire/Code -Sustainability Consultant -LEED Consultant -Interior Designer -Landscape Architect -Geotechnical Consultant -Parking Consultant -Accessibility Consultant -Civil Engineer GATEKEEPERS Fire Inspector Structural Reviewer DECISION MAKERS GSB Representative: Kathleen Cavanaugh Architect: Boora Architects Capital Planning and Mgmt.: Tom Bauer Knight Management Center Lecture Hall Project TEAMS…

4. Project Teams Knight Management Center Lecture Hall Stanford Project Management GSB Architect Boora AruptStructuralMechanicalElectricalPlumbingAcousticsFire/Code LEED Consultant Interior Designer Landscape Architect Geotechnical Consultant Parking consultant Accessibility consultant CM+GC Tuner construction Design build subcontractors Subcontractors

5. Knight Management Center Lecture Hall General Stanford Population Facilities Management Accessibility Consultant Parking Consultant Geotechnical Consultant Landscape Architect Interior Designer Arup CM/GC Tuner CM/GC Tuner Architect BOORA Architect BOORA Office of Land, Buildings and real Estate GSB Administration GSB Administration Sub Contractors Design-Build Sub contractors LEED Consultant Sustainability Consultant Sustainability Consultant Fire/Code Acoustics Plumbing Electrical Mechanical Structural Owner Architecture & Contractor Consultant & SC GSB Representative Stanford CPM Stanford CPM GSB IT/Audio Visual Team GSB Student Faculty & Staff Structural Reviewer Fire Inspector Stakeholders Gatekeepers Interior Designer Arup GSB Alumni Asso. Santa Clara county Office of Registrar Stanford Law School Board of Trustees University Provost University Architect

6. Economic Goals Within Budget Energy Efficient Meet Programming Needs Maintain Stanford Architectural Theme Stay on schedule Low lifecycle cost Environmental Goals Energy Efficient Good Daylighting Facility Performance Goals Top of the line Facility Good Daylighting Eliminate Outside Sound Conceal Trash Compactor Traffic Control Good Teaching/Performance Space Ergonomic Ease of IT use Multi-use Facility Thermal Comfort Texturize Space Sound Waves In Phase Structure Performance Goals Structurally Sound Energy Efficient Code Compliant Knight Management Center Lecture Hall Project GOALS…

7. Knight Management Center Lecture Hall Project GOALS… Within Budget Energy Efficiency Low like Cycle Cost Good Day Lighting Good teaching space Thermal Comfort Ease of IT Use Good Acoustics Replace Kresge Auditorium Owner Meet Programming Needs Structurally Sound Control Noise Transfer from Outside High interior aesthetic appeal Architect Stay on Schedule Contractor Maintain Stanford Architectural Aesthetic Stakeholders Operable post-seismic Appeal Gate keeper

8. GOALS METRICS Maximize Daylighting 80% lighting needs during day met by natural daylight ~ (+3) 40% lighting needs during day met by natural daylight ~ (0) 0% lighting needs during day met by natural daylight ~ (-3) Maximize Space Functionality Ergonomic seating, excellent visibility for all audience members, audio quality for speaking and music ~ (+3) Adequate seating, visibility limited to front section, basic ability to hear speaker ~ (0) Highly uncomfortable seating, poor visibility from all sections, hot and cold spots for >20% audience ~ (-3) Stay Within Budget Primary GOALS & METRICS… Building is designed and constructed for less than initial budget ~ (+3) Building is designed and constructed exactly at budget ~ (0) Building is designed and constructed for more than 1.5 times initial budget ~ (-3) Knight Management Center Lecture Hall

9. Future State Narrative… Knight Management Center Lecture Hall

10. Z goals set (10 point weight) = 100 possible project points (10 point weight) = 100 possible project points X goals set (60 point weight) Y goals set (30 point weight) + + + + Current MACDADI: Designers & Stakeholders DEFINE Goals Knight Management Center Lecture Hall ArchitectContractorCP & MGSB PrestigeProfitPracticalityPerformance INNOVATION: Designers & Stakeholders DEFINE Preferences Problem: CONFLICTING Goals NEEDS WANTS = design option points # points received* ( Level 3) + # points received* (Level 2) + # points received* (Level 1) ~ for each design option… (# goals met * point weight) # goals set = # points received *Point Equation: (per level) THE SACRED COW Level 1 (non-negotiable goal) Level 2 Level 3 THE SACRED COW (non-negotiable goal) THE SACRED COW (non-negotiable goal) THE SACRED COW (non-negotiable goal) THE SACRED COW (non-negotiable goal) IDEALLY: Design Option w/ Most Points = Best Design Option