Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

2015 Traffic Signals 101 Topic 1 Why?. Office of Traffic, Safety, and Technology Why? Who initiates a signal? Developer City/County Politician Public.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "2015 Traffic Signals 101 Topic 1 Why?. Office of Traffic, Safety, and Technology Why? Who initiates a signal? Developer City/County Politician Public."— Presentation transcript:

1 2015 Traffic Signals 101 Topic 1 Why?

2 Office of Traffic, Safety, and Technology Why? Who initiates a signal? Developer City/County Politician Public State 2

3 Office of Traffic, Safety, and Technology Why? Signal Warrants Traffic control signals should not be installed unless one or more of the signal warrants in the MN MUTCD are met The satisfaction of a warrant or warrants is not in itself justification for a signal Information should be obtained by means of engineering studies and compared with the requirements set forth in the warrants An Intersection Control Evaluation report needs to be prepared (see slide 8) 3

4 Office of Traffic, Safety, and Technology Why? Warrant 1 - Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume Warrant 2 - Four-Hour Vehicular Volume Warrant 3 - Peak Hour Warrant 4 - Pedestrian Volume 4  Signal Warrants Signal Warrants

5 Office of Traffic, Safety, and Technology Why? Warrant 5 - School Crossing Warrant 6 - Coordinated Signal System Warrant 7 - Crash Experience Warrant 8 - Roadway Network Warrant 9 - Intersection Near a Grade Crossing 5  Signal Warrants

6 Office of Traffic, Safety, and Technology Why? Warrant 1 Example The Minimum Vehicular Volume, Condition A, is intended for application at locations where a large volume of intersecting traffic is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal The Interruption of Continuous Traffic, Condition B, is intended for application at locations where condition A is not satisfied and where the traffic volume on a major street is so heavy that traffic on a minor intersecting street suffers excessive delay or conflict in entering or crossing the major street 6

7 Office of Traffic, Safety, and Technology Why? 7 600 200

8 Office of Traffic, Safety, and Technology Why? Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) In the past, the only perceived solution to traffic delay and safety problems for at- grade intersections was the installation of a traffic signal Based on Signal Justification Reports (SJR) Other options including stop control, roundabouts, and unconventional reduced-access intersections, may be acceptable alternatives 8

9 Office of Traffic, Safety, and Technology Why? ICE Definition Intersection Control Evaluation, or ICE, is a process that identifies the best intersection control through a comprehensive analysis and documentation of the technical (safety and operational), economic, and political issues of viable alternatives 9

10 Office of Traffic, Safety, and Technology Why? Purpose of ICE Evaluate various intersection designs Select the optimal control for an intersection based on an objective analysis for the existing conditions and future needs Document all technical, financial, and political issues in the ICE Report Replaces the SJR 10

11 Office of Traffic, Safety, and Technology Why? 11

12 Office of Traffic, Safety, and Technology Why? Cover Manuals 12 Signal & Lighting Certification Roadway Lighting Design Manual Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MN MUTCD) Signal Design Manual (Update in 2014)

13 Office of Traffic, Safety, and Technology Why? Cover Manuals Standard Specifications Traffic Engineering Manual (TEM) Signal Optimization and Timing Manual

14 Office of Traffic, Safety, and Technology Why? For up-to-date information, visit: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/trafficeng/ 14


Download ppt "2015 Traffic Signals 101 Topic 1 Why?. Office of Traffic, Safety, and Technology Why? Who initiates a signal? Developer City/County Politician Public."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google