1. Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

2. 6 - 2 Chapter 6 Implementing Social Responsibility This chapter:  Discusses the key elements of managing for social responsibility, including leadership, review, strategy, reporting, and verification.  Discusses corporate and strategic philanthropy.

3. 6 - 3 The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Opening Case  Bill Gates was a slender, intense boy with a messy room and a dazzling mind who often challenged his teachers in class.  He attended Harvard University, but left to pursue his fascination with computers.  At age 19, Gates founded Microsoft Corporation and twelve years later he was a billionaire.  He was energetic, independent, and confrontational and developed the reputation of a fanatical competitor willing to appropriate any technology and crush market rivals.

4. 6 - 4 The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Opening Case (continued)  Gates established the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which has an endowment of $33 billion.  The foundation’s work is based on a two values:  All lives—no matter where they are being led—have equal value;  To whom much is given, much is expected.  The foundation has given out more than $13.4 billion. Gates follows a long tradition of wealthy entrepreneurs who have made fortunes, sometimes by compromising ethics, then later in life used their wealth for works of extraordinary benevolence..

5. 6 - 5 Sources of Pressure for Social Responsibility

6. 6 - 6 Leadership and Business Models  Top management sets the tone for a company’s social response.  A traditional business model is one in which the central strategy is based on meeting market demands.  A progressive business model is one is which the central strategy is to meet market needs by mitigating social problems.  Although based on traditional business models, some companies have cultures emphasizing voluntary social responsibility in one or more dimensions because of the influence of founders.

7. 6 - 7 A Spectrum of Responses to Social Demands

8. 6 - 8 CSR Implementation: CSR Review  CSR implementation includes an assessment of the firm’s current situation and activities, discovery of the firm’s core values,and engagement of stakeholders.  A key source of values is the mission statement, a brief statement of the basic purpose of an organization.  Engagement has advantages:  Mapping helps identify sphere of influence.  Dialogue can review gaps between company performance and stakeholder expectations, provide important information, build trust, and lead to cooperative efforts.

9. 6 - 9

10. 6 - 10 CSR Implementation: CSR Strategy  A company defining its CSR strategy must first find an objective, or a vision of what it will achieve, then create a method for reaching it.  For large firms the task of setting priorities is complex because multiple, sometimes conflicting, stakeholder demands exist.  Border and Kramer suggests an “essential test” for the worthiness of any additional social initiative is to determine whether it produces a meaningful benefit for society that is also vital to the business.

11. 6 - 11 CSR Implementation  Steps for CSR implementation:  Create a CSR decision-making structure within the overall organization  Develop an action plan that sets forth a multitude of tasks that will bring the strategy to fruition  Establish performance targets and timelines for their accomplishment  Setup incentives to encourage achievement of goals and targets  Align corporate culture with strategic intent

12. 6 - 12 CSR Implementation: Reporting and Verification  Assessment and reporting create transparency and allows managers to evaluate corporate social performance and measure overall progress toward strategic goals.  In the last decade a new wave of social reporting has risen.  The leading effort to create a new reporting format is the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)  GRI guidelines show performance on a triple bottom line of economic, social, and environmental results.

13. 6 - 13 Corporate Philanthropy  Large philanthropic contributions by American companies are a relatively recent phenomenon.  Until about 50 years ago courts held that corporate funds belonged to shareholders; therefore, managers had no right to give away money, even for noble motives.  The first major break from narrow legal restrictions on corporate giving was the Revenue Act of 1935, which allowed charitable contributions to be deducted from taxable earnings up to 5 percent of net profits before taxes (raised to 10 percent in 1981.)

14. 6 - 14 Patterns and Magnitudes of Corporate Giving  Charitable giving is now a traditional dimension of corporate social responsibility.  Corporate philanthropy is only a small part of overall private philanthropy in the U.S.  The basic motives for corporate giving are:  Response to pressure  Belief that it will bring monetary profit  Desire for reputational gain  Altruism

15. 6 - 15 Strategic Philanthropy  As corporations gained experience with philanthropy, many concluded that the traditional approach of diffuse giving to myriad worthy causes was noble but flawed.  Many firms decided to change their philosophy of giving from one of pure generosity to one that aligned charity with commercial objectives.  Strategic philanthropy is a form of corporate and three in which charitable activities reinforce strategic business goals  Not everyone approves of strategic philanthropy.

16. 6 - 16 Cause-Related Marketing  Cause-related marketing is a marketing method linking a corporation or brand to a social cause so that both benefit.  Corporations realize that if their brand is connected to a social cause or charity, this appeals to the conscience of a consumer.  Cause-related marketing raises big sums of money for worthy causes but its mixture of altruism and self-interest attracts criticism.

17. 6 - 17 New Forms of Philanthropy  Philanthropy can be inefficient compared with market-driven business activity.  An emerging approach seeks to increase productivity from charitable giving by bringing businesslike methods to the task.  These new approaches to philanthropy seek to solve global problems by correcting market failures and applying the tools of capitalism.

18. 6 - 18 Concluding Observations  If a corporation announces aspirations to be socially responsible, it must follow up with the hard work of building those aspirations into its operations.  Corporate philanthropy, while not a management method, is a long-standing way of implementing social responsibility.  Recently, corporations have shifted from a tradition of altruistic giving to a new style of philanthropy that aligns with business strategy.  Some critics attack this approach as too self-interested.  Strategic philanthropy may be a promising development because it injects thinking about corporate social responsibility into the strategic mainstream.