1. 4. Results and Analysis When TiO 2 was used as a modifier, low NOx reduction was measured suggesting that the method of incorporation of TiO 2 into the asphalt binder mix may not be environmentally-effective. The low efficiencies could be due that only a small amount of TiO 2 is actually present at the surface. Exposing the binder to UV light did not accelerate the aging mechanisms in the material as compared to the sample that was not subjected to UV light. The use of TiO 2 as an air purification agent did not accelerate the aging mechanisms in the binder. 1. Introduction The US faces a significant challenge in controlling air pollution resulting from transportation activities. Tall buildings prevent the dispersion of air pollutants originating at the street level from road traffic in urban and metropolitan areas. Photocatalytic compounds such as nano- sized Titanium Dioxide (TiO 2 ) particles can be used to trap and absorb harmful pollutants. Current application of this technology is limited to concrete pavements With 94% of the US road network covered with asphalt, it appears that widespread use of TiO 2 in air purification applications can only be achieved by incorporation of this technology in hot-mix asphalt (HMA) A Breakthrough Concept in the Preparation of Highly-Sustainable Photocatalytic Warm Asphalt Mixtures NSF GRANT # 1032288 NSF PROGRAM NAME: EAGER - CMMI Marwa Hassan, Louay Mohammad, Heather Dylla, Samuel B. Cooper, Ahmad Mokhtar, and Somayeh Asadi Louisiana State University Use of TiO 2 in a Thin Coating TiO 2 was effective in removing NOx pollutants from the air stream with an efficiency ranging from 39 to 52%. The increase in TiO 2 application rate beyond an optimum coverage rate may block nanoparticles’ access to light and contaminants, and therefore, decrease NO x removal efficiency 2. Objectives The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that TiO 2 can function as a photocatalytic compound when used in the preparation of Warm-Mix Asphalt (WMA) The use of TiO 2 as a modifier in the preparation of WMA will have the added benefits of reduced energy and the associated pollution emissions during production. 3. Experimental Plan Two methods of application were investigated: Asphalt cement binder blends were prepared by mixing a conventional WMA binder (WMA additive Evotherm was used at 1% by weight of the binder) with a commercial crystallized anatase-based TiO 2 powder at three percentages 3, 5, and 7% by weight of the binder. Apply a thin surface coating to the WMA surface at three coverage rates (0.11, 0.21, and 0.31 kg/m 2 ). Testing Program: Prepared asphalt blends were characterized using fundamental rheological tests (i.e., dynamic shear rheometry, rotational viscosity, and bending beam rheometer). The environmental performance of the prepared samples to remove nitrogen oxides was measured using a newly-developed experimental setup Fracture resistance was assessed using the semi- circular bending (SCB) test 5. Conclusions When used as a modifier to asphalt binder in the preparation of WMA, the photocatalytic compound was not effective in degrading NOx in the air stream. This could be attributed to the fact that only a small amount of TiO 2 is present at the surface. When used as part of a surface spray coating, TiO 2 was effective in removing NOx pollutants from the air stream with an efficiency ranging from 39 to 52%. Rheological test results indicated that the addition of TiO 2 did not affect the physical properties of the conventional binder. In addition, exposing the binder to UV light did not appear to accelerate the aging mechanisms in the binder. The use of TiO 2 as a binder modifier improved the mix fracture resistance at 3, and 5% while it did not have a noticeable effect when used at a content of 7.0% The use of TiO2 as a binder modifier improved the mix fracture resistance at 3, and 5% while it did not have a noticeable effect when used at a content of 7.0%. Illustration of the Photocatalytic Process The semi-circular bending test (SCB) Illustration of the Environmental Setup TiO 2 Binder TestingSpec Test Temp PG 64 W64CO PG 64 W64CO + UV PG 64 + 7%TiO 2 PG 64 + 7%TiO 2 + UV Test on Original Binder Dynamic Shear, G*/Sin(δ), (kPa), AASHTO T315 1.00 + 64°C1.15NA1.55NA 1.00 + 70°CNTNANTNA Rotational Viscosity (Pa·s), AASHTO T316 3.0 - 135°C0.4NA0.5NA Tests on RTFO Mass Loss, %1.00 - ----0.9NA0.2NA Dynamic Shear, G*/Sin(δ), (kPa), AASHTO T315 2.20 + 64°C2.69NA2.94NA 2.20 + 70°CNTNANTNA Tests on (RTFO+ PAV) Dynamic Shear, G*Sin(δ), (kPa), AASHTO T315 5000 - 25°C3459258037982812 BBR Creep Stiffness, (MPa), AASHTO T313 300 - -12°C167158201145 Bending Beam m-value AASHTO T313 0.300 + -12°C0.3110.3420.3050.340 Actual PG Grading64-22 Coverage (kg/m 2 )NO x Reduction % NO Reduction % Control2.6%5.0% 0.11kg/m 2 38.9%51.2% 0.21kg/m 2 53.2%70.3% 0.32kg/m 2 40%52.6% TiO 2 ContentJc (kJ/m 2 ) Control 0.29 3.0 % 0.45 5.0 % 0.46 7.0 %0.28