1. WFD: HMWB & AWB Geomorphological MMA Workshop Arup Campus, Monday the 28 th of May 2012 Process

2. 2 General Approach Specific Actions for Specific Locations

3. 3 Quick! Decision Making Spatially Linked Relevant to waterbody General Approach

4. 4 Specific Actions for Specific Locations Quick! Decision Making Spatially Linked Relevant to waterbody General Approach Excel-based

5. 5 Specific Actions for Specific Locations Quick! Decision Making Spatially Linked Relevant to waterbody General Approach Excel-based

6. The Team & Input

7. 7 MMA Team (Arup & ASM) EA Teams (EM, FRB, Ops, A&R, FRM) Third Parties (IDBs, LAs) Data (Site visits, NFCDD, GIS) Input

8. 8 MMA Team (Arup & ASM) EA Teams (EM, FRB, Ops, A&R, FRM) Third Parties (IDBs, LAs) Data (Site visits, NFCDD, GIS) Input

9. 9 MMA Team (Arup & ASM) EA Teams (EM, FRB, Ops, A&R, FRM) Third Parties (IDBs, LAs) Data (Site photos, NFCDD, GIS) Input

10. The Process

11. 11 Process– Humber RBMP

12. 12 Process – Example from Humber RBMP

13. 13 Process – Understand WB & Generic Pressures

14. 14 Process – Understand WB & Generic Pressures

15. 15 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify specific pressures

16. 16 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify specific pressures

17. 17 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify specific pressures List of Pressures in Excel WFD Tool 3 rd Party information GISNFCDD Other EA GIS data OS mapping, Historical maps, aerial photos Site photos FRB, A&R Reports

18. 18 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify specific pressures Meeting with EA teams List of Pressures in Excel WFD Tool 3 rd Party information GISNFCDD Other EA GIS data OS mapping, Historical maps, aerial photos Site photos FRB, A&R Reports

19. 19 Process – ‘Sense Check’

20. 20 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify specific pressures Ops GIS layers Obstructions database Detailed river network Flood zones WFD Monitoring points Abstractions

21. 21 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures

22. 22 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify generic mitigation RBMP Annex B Specific Pressures ‘Increase in-channel morphological diversity’ ‘Set-back embankments’ ‘Educate landowners on sensitive management practices’.. Identify specific pressures

23. 23 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures

24. 24 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures

25. 25 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process

26. 26 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Already in place? Increase Flood Risk? Socio- economic effects? KPI 962 -ve evironmental impact Measures Carried Forward

27. 27 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process ‘Sense Check’

28. 28 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process

29. 29 Process – ‘Stage 2’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation

30. 30 Process – ‘Stage 2’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation

31. 31 Process – ‘Stage 2’

32. 32 Process – ‘Stage 2’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation

33. 33 Process – ‘Stage 2’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation

34. 34 Process – ‘Stage 2’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost

35. 35 Process – ‘Stage 2’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost

36. 36 Process – ‘Stage 2’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost

37. 37 Process – ‘Stage 2’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost ‘Stage 2’

38. 38 Process – ‘Action Assessment’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost Cost-benefit assessment

39. 39 Process – ‘Action Assessment’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost Cost-benefit assessment ‘Low’£0 - £25k ‘Medium’£25 - £50K ‘High’£50+

40. 40 Process – ‘Action Assessment’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost Cost-benefit assessment Final key criteria Is the measure technically feasible? Is the measure disproportionately costly?

41. 41 Process – ‘Action Assessment’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost Cost-benefit assessment Final criteria Actions Carried forward

42. 42 Process – ‘Action Assessment’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost Cost-benefit assessment Final criteria Actions Carried forward Specific Actions for Specific Locations

43. 43 Process – ‘Action Assessment’

44. 44 Potential Improvement More GIS-based process Consultation/discussion with ‘preferred options’ Greater flexibility in spreadsheet for different contexts More initial filtering of measures (feasibility, relevancy and cost) Potential Improvement Spatially Linked Relevant to waterbody Quick! Decision Making

45. Questions?

46. 46 More information: Matthew Johnsonmatthew.johnson@arup.commatthew.johnson@arup.com Natalie Walker natalie.walker@arup.comnatalie.walker@arup.com Patricia Xavierpatricia.xavier@arup.compatricia.xavier@arup.com Thanks for Listening!