Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

What are the limits of arthroscopic shoulder instability repair Emmanuel Antonogiannakis Director Of “Center for Shoulder Arthroscopy” ΙΑΣΩ General Hospital,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "What are the limits of arthroscopic shoulder instability repair Emmanuel Antonogiannakis Director Of “Center for Shoulder Arthroscopy” ΙΑΣΩ General Hospital,"— Presentation transcript:

1 What are the limits of arthroscopic shoulder instability repair Emmanuel Antonogiannakis Director Of “Center for Shoulder Arthroscopy” ΙΑΣΩ General Hospital, Athens WWW.SHOULDER.GR

2 The Shoulder Greatest Range of Motion in the Body Motion in all 3 planes of movement Prone to injuries 8-20% of all sports injuries WWW.SHOULDER.GR

3 Instability Biomechanical Dysfunction Failure of static and dynamic stabilizers Ranges from mild subluxation to traumatic dislocation WWW.SHOULDER.GR

4 T.U.B.S. T.U.B.S. Traumatic Unidirectional Bankart lesion Surgery A.M.B.R.I. A.M.B.R.I. Atraumatic Multidirectional Bilateral Rehabilitation Inferior capsular shift A.I.O.S. A.I.O.S. Acquired Instability Overstress Surgery Instability Profiles WWW.SHOULDER.GR

5 Types of instability Not a black or white issue WWW.SHOULDER.GR

6 Patients of all ages and all activity levels with recurrent anterior instability who are impaired functionally and in whom nonoperative treatment has failed Revision stabilization First-time, acute shoulder dislocations Arthroscopic Shoulder Stabilization Patient Selection WWW.SHOULDER.GR

7 Arthroscopic Reconstruction Success rate 50-100% WWW.SHOULDER.GR

8 High Initial Failure Rate of Arthroscopic Techniques Technical factors (medial repair) Failure to treat other lesions (RI, capsular laxity) Failure to recognize the importance of the dynamic stabilizers and the rehabilitation program WWW.SHOULDER.GR

9 Unidirectional, traumatic instability Bankart lesion First dislocation Robust labroligamentous tissue Low activity level no athletes Experienced surgeon The Ideal Patient WWW.SHOULDER.GR

10 As Dr Rockwood proposed following all the above limitations probably no-one should be treated arthroscopic

11 What have we learned ?

12 Bankart Lesion the essential lesion Avulsion of the IGHL from the glenoid rim from 2 o’clock to 6 o’clock Primary restraint to anterior translation at 90 o of abduction 85% in traumatic anterior dislocations Not enough to induce symptomatic instability WWW.SHOULDER.GR

13 Bankart Lesion WWW.SHOULDER.GR

14 Recurrent dislocations also can cause stretching of the glenohumeral capsule and ligaments This plastic deformation occurs from repetitive loading Bankart Lesion Equivalent WWW.SHOULDER.GR

15

16 BONY LESIONS Humeral Head Glenoid rim LABRAL - LIGAMENTOUS INJURY Bankart lesion A.L.P.S.A. H.A.G.L. Capsular Tear INCREASED CAPSULAR VOLUME Atraumatic elongation Traumatic stretch Associated Lesions BICEPS LESIONS ROTATOR CUFF TEARS Partial thickness Full thickness ROTATOR INTERVAL PATHOLOGY Widening Synovitis Rupture WWW.SHOULDER.GR

17 Hill-Sachs humerus glenoid Indentation fracture Present in 85% of recurrent dislocations

18 SLAP II SLAP IV

19 Arthroscopic Shoulder Reconstruction Goal of the Operation: Restoration of the Labrum to its anatomic attachment Reestablishment of the appropriate tension in the GH ligaments and capsule WWW.SHOULDER.GR

20 Goal of arthroscopic shoulder reconstruction Proximal Shift of the Capsule WWW.SHOULDER.GR

21 Arthroscopic Reconstruction: Technique 1. Define Pathology 2. Debride damaged tissue 3. Release capsule to/past 6 o’clock 4. Abrade glenoid 5. Repair capsulolabral complex 6. Associated Injuries (Posterior capsule, Rotator Interval, SLAP) WWW.SHOULDER.GR

22 1. Identify and Define Pathology WWW.SHOULDER.GR

23 Scope in Anterior-Superior Portal WWW.SHOULDER.GR Change portals

24 Mobilization of Anterior Labrum WWW.SHOULDER.GR

25 Anchor Placement WWW.SHOULDER.GR

26 1 st suture passage WWW.SHOULDER.GR

27 Knot Tying WWW.SHOULDER.GR

28 Evaluation of Repair WWW.SHOULDER.GR

29 Postoperative Rehabilitation Sling for 4/52 Isometrics and pendulum exercises immediately Active forward elevation may begin after 3/52 External rotation to 30° to 40° at 4/52 Progressive strengthening at 8/52 Return to sport at 18 to 36 weeks supervised and individualized WWW.SHOULDER.GR

30 Arthroscopic Stabilization of the Shoulder: A Prospective Randomized Study of Absorbable Versus Nonabsorbable Suture Anchors Frostick, et all WWW.SHOULDER.GR Arthroscopy, July, 2006 130 patients mean follow-up: 2.6 years Lost to follow-up 5%. Redislocation rate 6%.

31 The “Purse-String” Technique: An Arthroscopic Technique for Stabilization of the anteroinferior instability of the Shoulder. Early and Medium-Term Results Ofer Levy et all WWW.SHOULDER.GR Arthroscopy January, 2007 36 pt (37 shoulders). Follow up : 36 months (range, 27 to 87 months). 2 recurences (5.4%) 97% returned to the same sport that they had played before injury. 66% of patients returned to their preinjury level of sports

32 Arthroscopic anterior stabilization and posterior capsular plication for anterior glenohumeral Instability: A Report of 71 Cases J. Snyder, M.D. et all WWW.SHOULDER.GR Arthroscopy, May 2006 71 patients (follow-up m.a. 33.3 months) 5 redislocations 7% 97% of patients reported they were able to return to their normal activity level, 90% of patients reported that they were able to return to their previous level of athletics

33 Glenoid Bone Loss > 30% Limitations of the Arthroscopic Techniques WWW.SHOULDER.GR

34 Traumatic Glenohumeral Bone Defects and Their Relationship to Failure of Arthroscopic Bankart Repairs: Significance of the Inverted-Pear Glenoid and the Humeral Engaging Hill-Sachs Lesion S.S. Burkhart and J. F. De Beer, M.D. WWW.SHOULDER.GR Arthroscopy,October 2000

35   Total group: 194 patients   173 pt without significant bone defects : 7 pt sustained a recurrence (4%)   21 pt with significant bone defects: 14 pt developed recurrent instability(67%)

36 WWW.SHOULDER.GR Arthroscopy December 2006 Arthroscopic Management of Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability in Collision Athletes: Analysis of 204 Cases With a 4- to 9-Year Follow-Up and Results With the Suture Anchor Technique Larrain et all

37 204 rugby players with acute or recurrent traumatic anterior instability   mean follow-up 5.9 years   39 cases of acute instability : arthroscopic stabilization : 2 redislocations (5.1%)   158 cases of recurrent instability : 121 arthroscopic stabilization: 10 recurences(8.3%)

38 The level of athletic activity after arthroscopic stabilization probably is not a factor of recurence,the presence of bone defects is!! WWW.SHOULDER.GR

39 Normal Glenoid inverted pear Bony Bankart pear Compression Bankart loss of anterior rim

40 Engaging Hill-Sachs Lesion Articular Arc Deficit glenoid humeral head anterior capsule

41 Limitations of the Arthroscopic Techniques   Glenoid Bone Loss > 30% Open Latarjet procedure

42   Glenoid Bone Loss > 30% Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure L. Lafosse Arthroscopic shoulder stabilization with a bone block E. Taverna et all Nice shoulder course 2006 Limitations of the Arthroscopic Techniques WWW.SHOULDER.GR

43 Engaging Hill-Sachs WWW.SHOULDER.GR

44   Engaging Hill-Sachs-glenoid bone loss Limitations of the Arthroscopic Techniques WWW.SHOULDER.GR Hill- Sachs Remplisage: An arthroscopic surgical solution for the engaging Hill-Sachs E.M. Wolf Nice shoulder course 2006

45 Hill- Sachs Remplisage

46

47 HAGL lesions Limitations of the Arthroscopic Techniques WWW.SHOULDER.GR

48   HAGL lesions Limitations of the Arthroscopic Techniques WWW.SHOULDER.GR Arthroscopic repair of HAGL and reverse HAGL lesions A Cowboy’s guide to advanced shoulder arthroscopy Burkhart’s view of the shoulder

49  Absent destroyed capsule i.e.Thermal shrinkage i.e.Thermal shrinkage Allograft reconstruction Allograft reconstruction Limitations of the Arthroscopic Techniques

50

51 Chronic Locked dislocation Irreducible dislocations

52 Large Hill-Sachs lesion Large Hill-Sachs lesion Allograft reconstruction Allograft reconstruction or prosthetic replacement or prosthetic replacement Limitations of the Arthroscopic Techniques

53 Conclusions WWW.SHOULDER.GR  Arthroscopic shoulder stabilization gained wider acceptance  Repair of all the lesions found is essential for long term good results  Restoration of the dynamic stabilizers i.e. a supervised rehabilitation program is essential  the athroscopic treatment of bone defects and soft tissue loss is the next chalenge  The experience of the surgeon and the ability to recognize the anatomic structures sets the limits of arthroscopic shoulder stabilization

54 WWW.SHOULDER.GR


Download ppt "What are the limits of arthroscopic shoulder instability repair Emmanuel Antonogiannakis Director Of “Center for Shoulder Arthroscopy” ΙΑΣΩ General Hospital,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google