1. New Teacher Performance Evaluation Program 2012-13

2. Outcomes Participants will become familiar with: The revised handbook, resources, and tools Professional development opportunities and support for the new evaluation system

3. “In FCPS all schools will build professional learning communities that employ best practices to raise the bar and close achievement gaps. All educators will use the Program of Studies to ensure all students reach their full potential with an expectation that students will read on grade level and graduate on time.” -Jack D. Dale 8.8.12

4. Check for Understanding When and why did VDOE revise the Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers? How many standards are there? Can you name them?

5. What are the similarities and differences between our former evaluation system and current evaluation system?

7. What are the changes? What are the changes? Seven standards instead of five Standard 7 is Student Academic Progress Matrices are used to rate the teacher Four rating levels, as opposed to three A minimum of one formal and three informal/mini- observations In addition to the goal-setting conference and documentation log, administrators are required to collect a minimum of four data sources Final evaluation conference between the evaluator and teacher is required for teachers in their summative evaluation year 7

8. 8 Change is necessary … If nothing ever changed, there would be no butterflies. - Author Unknown

9. Primary Purpose of the FCPS Teacher Performance Evaluation Program “To help both teachers and their evaluators collect more comprehensive and accurate assessment data for rating teacher effectiveness and, then to support quality teaching everyday in every classroom.” (Quote from forward of FCPS Teacher Performance Evaluation Handbook, Dr. James H. Stronge, August 2012)

10. Timeline

12. Training Plan

13. The teacher: 1.1Effectively addresses appropriate curriculum standards. 1.2Integrates key content elements and facilitates students’ use of higher level thinking skills in instruction. 1.3Demonstrates ability to link present content with past and future learning experiences, other subject areas, and real world experiences and applications. Main Components Highly EffectiveEffective Developing OR Needs Improvement Ineffective In addition to meeting the standard, the teacher consistently demonstrates extensive knowledge of the subject matter and continually enriches the curriculum. The teacher demonstrates an understanding of the curriculum, subject content, and the developmental needs of students by providing relevant learning experiences. The teacher inconsistently demonstrates understanding of the curriculum, content, and student development or lacks fluidity in using the knowledge in practice. The teacher bases instruction on material that is inaccurate or out- of-date and/or inadequately addresses the developmental needs of students. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MATRIX Performance Standard 1: Professional Knowledge The teacher demonstrates an understanding of the curriculum, subject content, and the developmental needs of students by providing relevant learning experiences. KEY ELEMENTS PERFORMANCE STANDARD

14. Teacher Performance Standards 1. 1. Professional Knowledge The teacher demonstrates an understanding of the curriculum, subject content, and the developmental needs of students by providing relevant learning experiences. 2. 2. Instructional Planning The teacher plans using the Virginia Standards of Learning, the school’s curriculum, effective strategies, resources, and data to meet the needs of all students. 3. 3. Instructional Delivery The teacher effectively engages students in learning by using a variety of instructional strategies in order to meet individual learning needs. 4. 4. Assessment of and for Student Learning The teacher systematically gathers, analyzes, and uses all relevant data to measure student academic progress, guide instructional content and delivery methods, and provide timely feedback to both students and parents throughout the school year. 5. 5. Learning Environment The teacher uses resources, routines, and procedures to provide a respectful, positive, safe, student-centered environment that is conducive to learning. 6. 6. Professionalism The teacher maintains a commitment to professional ethics, communicates effectively, and takes responsibility for and participates in professional growth that results in enhanced student learning 7. 7. Student Academic Progress The work of the teacher results in acceptable, measurable, and appropriate student academic progress.

15. A Closer Look at the Standards 15 Standard 1: Professional Knowledge Look-Fors Red Flags

16. Gallery Walk 16

17. Critical to Success this Year Teachers and administrators would benefit from discussing the standards and the matrices. Start with what it looks like meeting standards - Effective, then, what it looks like exceeding standards – Highly Effective.

18. What are some possible data sources that you could use for the different standards?

19. Possible Data Sources Observations There are four required observations of teachers on annual contract and teachers on continuing contract in their summative year, each with written feedback One observation must be a formal observation with written feedback and a post-conference Three observations are informal or mini observations Written feedback on formal and informal observations require the use of the forms in Part 3 of the handbook Mini observations have no specified form for feedback

20. Documentation Log A minimum of one and no more than three artifacts supporting each standard must be submitted for each evaluation period (summative and formative evaluation years) Document is discussed at goal-setting conference by the October 31 deadline Documentation reviewed at midyear conference only with teachers that are in the summative evaluation year Completed documentation presented to evaluator prior to their preparation of summative evaluation report Possible Data Sources

21. Student Opinion Surveys (Optional) For use by high school teachers only Survey samples are available in the FCPS Teacher Evaluation Handbook (also see Regulation 4428) Goal Setting for Student Progress Appropriate measures of academic progress are determined During first month of school, all teachers will work collaboratively with grade level or content team to create a SMARTR goal. Each teacher will fine-tune the goal to reflect the needs of their respective learners The goal will be approved by evaluator by the end of October Midyear review of student progress goal and modify strategies with administrator (summative evaluation year only) End-of-year review of goal attainment (all teachers) Possible Data Sources

22. VII. Student Academic Progress I. Professional Knowledge II. Instructional Planning III. Instruction al Delivery IV. Assessment of and for Student Learning V. Learning Environment VI. Professionalis m The first six standards impact student progress

23. What Makes Goals SMARTR? Strategic and Specific Measureable Attainable Results-oriented Time-bound Rigorous

24. Teacher Performance Standard 7: Student Academic Progress The work of the teacher results in acceptable, measurable, and appropriate student academic progress.

25. Example SMARTR goal In the current school year, all students will make measurable progress in the area of two- dimensional landscape. Using a 24-point division-developed rubric to measure texture, form, space, color, tone, and line (in which 20 points is considered proficient) all students will improve at least 6 points throughout the course of the year. Students scoring a level 20 or higher will further advance their skills by learning another artistic style, such as still life.

26. Resources Handbook: http://www.fcps.edu/hr/epd/evaluations/teacher/PDF/TeacherHB2012-13.pdf http://www.fcps.edu/hr/epd/evaluations/teacher/PDF/TeacherHB2012-13.pdf Crosswalk http://www.fcps.edu/hr/epd/evaluations/teacher/PDF/crosswalk.pdf http://www.fcps.edu/hr/epd/evaluations/teacher/PDF/crosswalk.pdf Training Plan http://fcpsnet.fcps.edu/pla/opp/teval/2012-13/Training_plan.pdf http://fcpsnet.fcps.edu/pla/opp/teval/2012-13/Training_plan.pdf

27. Suggested Timeline DateItems Prior to first meetingModule 1 Overview By September 7Introduce goal setting using Power Point provided and share school improvement goal and timelines of process By September 21CLTs meet to discuss focus for goal and pre-assessment to use (may need to create pre-assessment or identify one in place) By October 5Administer pre-assessment By October 12Set Goal Share data results in CLT teams Set goals as a team and refine goals as individual teachers to reflect your student population Decide on strategies as a team and/or individually By October 19Meet in CT with administrator By October 24Submit goal for approval to administrator By October 31Evaluator approves goal

28. More Information HR Teacher Evaluation Website http://www.fcps.edu/hr/epd/ evaluations/teacher.shtml http://www.fcps.edu/hr/epd/ evaluations/teacher.shtml PLA’s Homepage http://fcpsnet.fcps.edu/pla http://fcpsnet.fcps.edu/pla

29. QUESTIONS? Office of Employee Performance and Development (OPED) (571) 423 -3264 Growth and Development Team Supporting Teacher Evaluation (571) 423 -1380