Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Tobacco Production Update Bob Pearce, Gary Palmer, Andy Bailey Extension Tobacco Specialists Kenny Seebold Extension Plant Pathologist.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Tobacco Production Update Bob Pearce, Gary Palmer, Andy Bailey Extension Tobacco Specialists Kenny Seebold Extension Plant Pathologist."— Presentation transcript:

1 Tobacco Production Update Bob Pearce, Gary Palmer, Andy Bailey Extension Tobacco Specialists Kenny Seebold Extension Plant Pathologist

2 Topics Nitrogen sources for tobacco Revised nitrogen rates for tobacco Sucker control options –No MH options Variety update Disease update

3 Nitrogen Fertilizer Issues Economics –Leaf prices down –N fertilizer prices up Price tied to natural gas Transportation costs up Nitrosamine concerns –Tobacco companies want less N applied Quality concerns –Too little: thin body, poor yield –Too much: delayed maturity, fat stems

4 Ammonium Nitrate Issues Most common N source for tobacco growers Homeland security concerns –Can be used to make explosives –Easy availability Some manufacturing plants have closed –Tighter supplies –Higher costs Sales regulations –Permits needed to purchase large quantity? –Some dealers reluctant to stock?

5 Price Per Unit of Nitrogen for Selected Fertilizer Materials

6 Alternative N Sources Anhydrous ammonia (82% N) –Lowest cost per unit of N –Limited availability –Special equipment needed Stored as liquid under pressure Special injectors needed Used in illegal meth production –Feasible only if equipment already available –Placement concerns Delayed uptake Phyto-toxicity if close to plants

7 Alternative N Sources Anhydrous ammonia (82% N) –Reaction in soil NH 3 + 2O 2 → H + + NO 3 - +H 2 O Same lime requirement as AN –Suggestions for use Inject 6 to 8 inches deep 7 to 10 days before setting

8 Alternative N Sources Ammonium sulfate (21% N) –Specialty fertilizer Use on acid loving crops Use on high pH soils –Relatively high cost per unit N –Limited availability –Soil reaction (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 + 4O 2 → 4H + +2NO 3 - + SO 4 2- + 2H 2 O 3X lime requirement of AN –Not feasible for large scale use on tobacco

9 Alternative N Sources Urea (46% N) –Intermediate cost –Handling similar to ammonium nitrate Can impregnate some chemicals Same lime requirement as AN –Converted to nitrate in the soil Subject to loss if surface applied –Apply to dry soil –Incorporate or water in Delayed uptake (Don’t use for sidedress) –Feasible alternative if managed properly

10 Alternative N Sources Non Pressure Solutions (28 – 32% N) –Intermediate cost –Mixture of urea, ammonium nitrate, and water –Relatively easy to transport, store, and apply Most nurse tanks Many types of sprayers –Corrosive to equipment –Should be incorporated –Can be used a a carrier for spray applications –Limited availability –Feasible for tobacco production

11 Alternative N Sources Calcium – Ammonium Nitrate (27% N) –Ammonium nitrate mixed with lime 78% ammonium nitrate –Theoretically similar to ammonium nitrate Can impregnate some chemicals ? –Relatively high cost? –Availability? –Limited practical experience

12 Alternative N Sources Sodium Nitrate (16% N) Calcium Nitrate (15.5% N) Sodium-Potassium Nitrate (15% N) –Immediate uptake (good for sidedress) –Good for low pH soils –Erratic availability –High cost –Low analysis – high transport cost

13 Conversion to Nitrate in soil % of Fertilizer as NO 3 -N N SourceWeeks After Application 036 Ammonium Nitrate508090 Anhydrous Ammonia02065 Urea05075 UAN Solution256080 Nitrate Sources100

14 Effects of Ammonium Nitrate Application on Soil pH Anhydrous Ammonia, Urea, UAN solutions : similar

15 Effect of Liming an Acid Soil Prior to Use of Urea and Sodium Nitrate Sources of Nitrogen Both N sources applied at 225 lb N/A pre-plant. Soil pH (water) measured at midseason of each year. Soil pH before liming was 5.4.

16 Effect of Liming an Acid Soil Prior to Use of Urea and Sodium Nitrate Sources of Nitrogen Both N sources applied at 225 lb N/A pre-plant.

17 Nitrogen Source Study Harrison Co. – Keith Smith Farm 100 units AN Broadcast Sidedressed with 170 units each, AN = Ammonium Nitrate, U= Urea, CN = Calcium Nitrate, SN = Sodium Nitrate

18 Conventional Fertility Trial Monroe Co. – Al Pedigo Farm Number = lbs of product, AN = Ammonium Nitrate, CN = Calcium Nitrate, SN = Sodium Nitrate, U= Urea Broadcast Sidedress

19 No-till Fertility Trial Monroe Co. – Al Pedigo Farm Number = lbs of product, AN = Ammonium Nitrate, CN = Calcium Nitrate, SN = Sodium Nitrate, U= Urea Broadcast Sidedress

20 Effects of Sidedressing Different Sources of Nitrogen on Burley Yield Elliot Co. – Tracy D. Kitchen Farm 450 Ammonium Nitrate Broadcast followed by 100 lb/a of Nitrogen Sidedressed. Am = Ammonium, Ca = Calcium & Na = Sodium. There were no significant differences.

21 Effect of Nitrogen Source on Burley Yield Marshall Co. – Glen Thompson Farm 2579 2605 2650 2684 225 150 units Urea Broadcast Sidedressed with 100 units each at sidedressing, Ca = Calcium and Na = Sodium

22 Revised Nitrogen Rates AGR-1 will have a new table for N on tobacco –Based on crop history (same as old) –No additional N for continuous tobacco –Soil drainage formally considered –“Typical” recommendation 50 lbs. N/A less –Rate lower if sidedressing is practiced Economically sound recommendations Reduce incidence of over-application

23 Revised Nitrogen Recommendations for Burley and Dark Tobacco. Well Drained Soil Moderately Well Drained Soil ------------Lb N/A------------ Low N levels: following tobacco or row crops 225-250250-275 Medium N levels: first-year tobacco following a grass or grass-legume sod 200-225225-250 High N levels: first-year tobacco following legume sod or legume cover crop 150-175175-200

24 Effects of Nitrogen Rates on Burley Tobacco at Spindletop Farm (Maury Silt Loam) –MacKown, Sutton and Crafts-Brander – 1994

25 Nrate across location years and method

26 Effect of N rate and method of application on burley tobacco yield. If 1/3 or more is sidedressed reduce total amount of N by 15 to 25 lbs./A

27 Summary Encourage growers to compare costs and consider alternative N sources Revised N rates –Rates lowered by about 50 lbs./A –Will not significantly lower yield –Improved quality –Promotes desired chemical properties Reduce rate if sidedressing is practiced


Download ppt "Tobacco Production Update Bob Pearce, Gary Palmer, Andy Bailey Extension Tobacco Specialists Kenny Seebold Extension Plant Pathologist."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google