1. 1 Temporal Logic-Overview FM Temporal Logic u Classical logic: Good for describing static conditions u Temporal logic: Adds temporal operators Describe how static conditions change over time u Two main ways to represent temporal logic: Linear time: describes single possible time line  LTL (Linear Temporal Logic): Spin Branching time: describes all possible time lines  CTL (Computation Tree Logic): SMV

2. 2 Temporal Logic-Overview FM What can you do with TL? u Use Automaton to describe system behavior Describes actions of system In terms of state sequences u Use temporal logic to describe property of state sequences u Use model checker to verify TL property Checks TL property against automaton Exhaustively checks the automaton Automatic checking

3. 3 Temporal Logic-Overview FM Basic Idea of Temporal Logic u Truth changes over time u Must say when things are true, Not just what is true u Most model checking tools do not allow quantification Use propositional TLs (PTLs)

4. 4 Temporal Logic-Overview FM Semantics of Temporal Logic u 4 basic operators: : always : sometime or eventually : next time or next step : until u Conceptual representation: Let S be a sequence of states S[0]: first state; S[j] : jth state S[j..] sequence starting from jth state S[j..k] sequence from j to k U

5. 5 Temporal Logic-Overview FM More Formal Semantics u Classical Logic: S f: sequence S satisfies formula f S true: for any S S (f and g): S f and S g u Temporal Logic: S f : if for any j, S[j..] f S f : if for some j, S[j..] f Sf : if S[1..] f S f g : if for some k, S[k..] g,  and for any j < k, S[j..] f U

6. 6 Temporal Logic-Overview FM Example u Automaton/machine produces state sequence: abcabcabcabc… u Sequence satisfies property:  (a  b) and It’s always the case that a implies that the next step will be b  (a  a)) It’s always the case that a implies that the next step will eventually be an a. ab c

7. 7 Temporal Logic-Overview FM More Semantics of PTL u Next f: S[j] f iff S[j+1] f u Always f: S[j] f iff (  k: k  j  S[k] f) u Sometime f: S[j] f iff (  k: k  j  S[k] f) u f U g: S[j] f U g iff (  k: k  j  S[k] g)  (   l: j  l  k  S[l] f)

8. 8 Temporal Logic-Overview FM Sample Specifications u Mutual Exclusion: (  inCsA  inCsB) u Response: (wantsInA  inCsA) u See CSE814 handouts for Promela codification.

9. 9 Temporal Logic-Overview FM Computation Tree Logic u Most distributed, reactive systems are nondeterministic Cannot be represented by sequence of possible states or transitions Has a tree of possible computations u Can use CTL to represent these cases Computation Tree Logic

10. 10 Temporal Logic-Overview FM CTL Syntax u Basic logic AND u Temporal expressions: Temporal operators are defined in pairs Path part:  A: means “all paths” (inevitably)  E: means “on some path” (possibly) Property part:  F : same as % For some  G : same as% Globally holds  X : same as% neXt  U : same as U u Sample expressions:  AGp : On all paths, property p always holds  EGp : On some paths, property p always holds

11. 11 Temporal Logic-Overview FM Specification Patterns u Safety: bad thing never happens: AG (  bad-thing) u Liveness: good thing eventually happens AF good-thing u Bad thing could happen: EF bad-thing

12. 12 Temporal Logic-Overview FM System satisfying EFp

13. 13 Temporal Logic-Overview FM System satisfying EGp

14. 14 Temporal Logic-Overview FM System satisfying AGp

15. 15 Temporal Logic-Overview FM System satisfying AFp

16. 16 Temporal Logic-Overview FM Sample Specification Patterns u Possible to get to started state, but ready does not hold EF(started)  (  ready)) u If a request occurs, then it will eventually be acknowledged AG (requested  AF acknowledged)  Process is enabled  infinitely often on every path AG (AF enabled) u Whatever happens, a certain process will eventually be permanently deadlocked: AF (AG deadlocked) u From any state, it is possible to get to a restart state AG (AF restart)

17. 17 Temporal Logic-Overview FM Example Elevator u An elevator at the 2 nd floor traveling upward towards 5 th floor destination does not change its direction AG (floor = 2  direction = up  ButtonPressed5   A[direction = up  U floor 

18. 18 Temporal Logic-Overview FM Tool Support u Model checkers: check that system satisfies property u Reachability analysis: describe paths of behavior of system u Each tool uses different algorithms for optimization purposes SPIN (Holzmann et al) SMV (Clarket et al) Nitpick (D. Jackson) COSPAN (Kurshan, mostly for HW) Verisoft FDR Etc.