Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Zachman Framework Source: Enterprise Architecture, Intervista Institute www.intervista-institute.com.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Zachman Framework Source: Enterprise Architecture, Intervista Institute www.intervista-institute.com."— Presentation transcript:

1 Zachman Framework Source: Enterprise Architecture, Intervista Institute www.intervista-institute.com

2 Enterprise Engineering Design Objectives Alignment Integration Reusability Flexibility

3 Alignment Means… The implemented systems to be aligned with the business purpose 1.Build Row 1 models 2.Build Row 2 models 3.Build Row 3 models 4.Build Row 4 models 5.Build Row 5 models Ensuring the intent of each Row is successfully represented in the succeeding Row

4 Alignment To keep the implementation (Row 6) aligned with management’s intent (Rows 1, 2) Management’s intent (Rows 1, 2) The Design state of the art (Row 3) The Technology constraints (Row 4) The Technology products (Row 5) And The Enterprise Data (Column 1) The Processes(Column 2) The Distribution Network (Column 3) The Organization (Column 4) The Dynamics (Column 5) The Business Strategy (Column 6) (You have to retain and maintain the models)

5 Integration means… No discontinuity between the various related concepts within the Enterprise  Scope integration –no discontinuity within any one kind of model across the scope  Horizontal integration—no discontinuity across the different kinds of related models from Column to Column  Vertical integration—no discontinuity between the various Rows, the Owner’s, Designer’s, and Builder’s constraints

6 Three Definitions of “Integration” WhatHowWhereWhoWhenwhy Planner Owner Designer BuilderScope Integration Builder Sub- contractor ThingsProcessLocationPeopleTimeMotivation Horizontal Integration (any row) Vertical Integration (any column)

7 Integration Integration implies sharing, normalization You have any one concept defined only one time Any time you need some one concept, you reuse what has already been defined Do not re-create that same concept because it will cause redundancies and potential inconsistencies, discontinuities, etc. Integration is the Enterprise equivalent of Standard Interchangeable Parts

8 Reusability Related to integration If you want to engineer something to be reused, you have to know the total set of possibilities in order to engineer characteristics that will accommodate multiple uses. The key to reuse (and Integration) is Enterprise-wide normalized models.

9 Flexibility Means… Things implemented such that they can be changed in minimum time with minimum disruption, at minimum cost Similar concept: adaptability To achieve flexibility… Working with standard, interchangeable parts, that is, integrated architecture Any one concept exists only one time so if you need to change it… you change it once and it is changed for every deployment. Having an inventory of all the reusable concepts so you know where they are and that they are and could find them when you want to re-use them

10 Enterprise Division A Division BDivision C

11 Enterprise Division A Division BDivision C A Division? Easiest structure to conceptualize because it clearly consists of a set of business functions all integrated in support of a common business objective

12 Enterprise Division A Division BDivision C The whole enterprise?

13 Enterprise Division A Division BDivision C The Corporate Office?

14 Enterprise Division A Division B Division C The Intersection of the Divisions?

15 Enterprise Division A Division BDivision C An Implementation, i.e. an application? If you choose a boundary less than the natural integration boundary, you will dis-integrate the Enterprise

16 Enterprise Division A Division BDivision C Division A Division B Division C Division A Division B Division C If you choose a boundary beyond your jurisdictional control, you can no longer “declare” the models, you must “negotiate” the models.

17 Where to Start? The best place to start is at Row 1… Row 1 people build Row 1 models Row 2 people build Row models Row 3 people build Row 3 models; and so on. If you can’t get the Row 1 and Row2 people to build the Rows 1 and 2 models, the next best alternative is for Row 3 people to make assumptions about the Rows 1 and 2 models, but to make the assumptions explicit by actually building the models. Which column to start with is a function of your value system. The column you start with, you are tending to optimize. Subsequent columns you are tending to compromise. Zachman’s suggestion: starting with Col. 1, 3, & 6

18 Generic Responsibilities DataFunctionNetwork Scope Business model Business Strategy Indstrl Engnrng Logistics Mgnt System model Data AdminAppln AdminTech Planning Tech. Model Database Admin Project MgntDP Ops Detailed representations Network Admin Functioning enterprise e.g. datae.g., functione.g., communications Strategic Planning

19 Other Three Columns PeopleTimeMotivation Scope Org. Strategy Business model ? ? ? System model User Interface Systems Prog ? Tech model Security Mgmt ? Detailed representations Functioning enterprise Strategic Planning Business Planning

20 Zachman’s Architectural Principles Ensure implementations reflect the characteristics of the business such that the reality of the implemented Enterprise is consistent with management’s requirements/expectations. Ensure the meaning (semantics) of the data is consistent from implementation to implementation so that cross-application views are relevant and historical analysis over time is possible. Ensure hardware/system software is compatible from node to node to sustain the capability to successfully send messages between Enterprise components.

21 Ensure business rules are enforced consistently from implementation to implementation to coordinate and/or change behavior within the Enterprise. Ensure systems are defined logically, independent of technology constraints such that the implementation technology can be changed with minimum disruption and cost. Ensure change is incorporated as a design and a management criteria such that any aspect of the Enterprise (including the systems) can be maintained relevant in a dynamic environment. Zachman’s Architectural Principles


Download ppt "Zachman Framework Source: Enterprise Architecture, Intervista Institute www.intervista-institute.com."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google