1. Gaming Against Plagiarism: A Partnership between the Library and Faculty Amy G. Buhler, Margeaux Johnson, Michelle Leonard, and Ben DeVane University of Florida

2. The Project Denise BennettAmy BuhlerBen DeVaneAlyssa DiekmanRichard Ferdig Michelle LeonardDon McCabeAnton YudinMatthew CarrollDonna Wrublewski Margeaux JohnsonDoug LeveyMelody RoysterJames OliverioJonathan Tietz

3. Why Plagiarism? 1997 study of 1,946 students 2005 study of 63,700 undergraduates and 9,250 graduate students

4. Why A Game?

5. The Project Plan A NALYSIS - Identify the problem & establish goals for the project D ESIGN - Determine content & establish prototypes D EVELOPMENT - Create the product I MPLEMENTATION - Place the product into practice E VALUATION - Assess the product

6. The Project Plan

7. Building the Content Amy Buhler Alyssa Diekman Michelle Leonard Doug Levey Don McCabe Denise Bennett Donna Wrublewski Margeaux Johnson Melody Royster

8. Building the Content Level One Identify major types of plagiarism List basic rules to avoid plagiarism Identify data falsification and fabrication Level Two Explain the potential consequences of research misconduct both academically & professionally Level Three Apply the rules to increasingly complex scenarios Recognize and acknowledge differences in cultural approaches to plagiarism

9. Designing the Game Ben DeVane James Oliverio Anton Yudin Jonathan Tietz Matthew Carroll

10. Designing the Game Level One: Identify Level Two: Consequences Level Three: Complexity Game Three: Investigate & Argue Game Two: Manage Plagiarism Game One: Identify & Race

11. Designing the Game Game Three: Investigate & Argue Game Two: Manage Plagiarism Game One: Identify & Race

12. Designing the Game

13. Testing the Game 3 week test cycle: WEEK 1WEEK 2WEEK 3 Design team develops prototype Develop protocols Schedule participants Conduct user testing Write Usability Report

14. The Project Plan

15. References McCabe, D. L. (2005). Cheating among college and university students: A North American perspective. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 1(1), 2/16/2010. Retrieved from http://www.ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/IJEI/article/view/14 McCabe, D. L. (1997). Classroom cheating among natural science and engineering majors. Science and Engineering Ethics, 3(4), 433-445. doi:10.1007/s11948- 997-0046-y Whittington, J. & Colwell, J. (2009). Should a cyberethics class be required?: Plagiarism and online learning. Proceedings from the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Retrieved from http://soa.asee.org/paper/conference/paper-view.cfm?id=10919 Jones, S. (2003). Let the games begin: Gaming technology and college students. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2003/Let-the-games-begin-Gaming-technology-and-college-students.aspx Federation of American Scientists. (2006). Summit on educational games: Harnessing the power of video games for learning. Washington, D.C.: Federation of American Scientists. Retrieved from http://www.fas.org/gamesummit/Resources/Summit on Educational Games.pdf Green, C.S., Pouget, A., Bavelier, D. (2010) Improved Probabilistic Inference as a General Learning Mechanism with Action Video Games. Current Biology, 20(17), 1573-1579. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.07.040 Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon. Foss, M., Buhler, A.G., Johnson, M., Levey, D.J., & Oliverio, J.C. (2010, March 1). Gaming Against Plagiarism (GAP) Development Proposal. Retrieved from http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00098766/00001

16. Thank You ! To Follow the GAP project: http://blogs.uflib.ufl.edu/GAP This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1033002