1. Extreme Programming C Sc 335 November, 28 2005

2. 2 Overview Essence of Extreme Programming (XP) –Variables –Values –Principles –Practices

3. 3 Waterfall Model Waterfall was described by 1970 by W. W. Royce Understood as –finish each phase –don’t proceed till done Royce criticized this –proposed an iterative approach

4. 4 Became Popular Management liked phases to easily set deadlines Customers provide all requirements Analysts translate requirements into specification Coders implement the specification Reviews ensure the specification is met Testing is performed by others (QA) Maintenance means modifying as little as possible –old code is good code Change is hard (and costly)

5. 5 Cost of change Cost of change time Waterfall XP

6. 6 Sprial Dr Barry Boehm proposed a spiral approach

7. 7 Waterfall It became popular –This process is still is used a lot Craig Larman's book [1] provides proof that waterfall has proved to be a terrible way to develop software.[1] –In his study, 87% of all projects failed. –The waterfall process was the "single largest contributing factor for failure, being cited in 82% of the projects as the number one problem." [1][1] Agile and Iterative Development: a Manager's Guide, Addison-Wesley Professional, 2003

8. 8 Extreme Programming (XP) Almost ten years of growth Set of SE practices that produce high-quality software with limited effort Many books, first by Kent Beck: Extreme Programming–Embrace Change, Addison-Wesley, 2000, ISBN 0-201-61641-6 http://www.extremeprogramming.org/

9. 9 Extreme Programming XP is –a disciplined approach to software development –code centric: no reckless coding, test-first –successful because it emphasizes customer involvement and promotes team work –not a solution looking for a problem –One of several "agile" (can adapt to change) software development processes http://www.agilealliance.org/

10. 10 Fundamentals of XP Distinguishes between decisions made by business stakeholders and developers –Both are good at their own thing things Simplistic – keep design as simple as possible “design for today not for tomorrow” Write automated test code before writing production code and keep all tests running (continually integrate) Pair programming Short iterations with fast delivery

11. 11 Management summary Light-weight software development process –Replaces documentation with communication –Focuses on source code and testing Controversial – “Hacking”? –30-70% productivity improvement Developed by industry practitioners –“..proven at cost conscious companies like Bayerische Landesbank, Credit Swiss Life, DaimlerChrysler, First Union National Bank, Ford Motor Company and UBS.” XP Web Site

12. 12 Essence of XP Four variables in software development: –Cost, Time, Quality, Scope (# features) Four Values –Communication, Simplicity, Feedback, and Courage Five Principles –Provide feedback, assume simplicity, make incremental changes, embrace change, quality work 12 Practices (or fewer) –Planning game, small releases, simple designs, automated testing, continuous integration, refactoring, pair programming, collective ownership, 40-hour week, on-site customer, coding standard, metaphor

13. 13 Overview Essence of Extreme Programming (XP) –Variables –Values –Principles –Practices

14. 14 Managing Variables Managers: "You are going to get all of these requirements done by THE DATE " When this is the only consideration –"… quality goes out the window … Also likely to go out of control is time. You get crappy software late.", from Extreme Programming Explained, Kent Beck

15. 15 Four Variables: Cost Increase cost and you can do a bit more Pouring money into a project won't solve the problem – "I've been on two infinitely funded projects and both were utter disasters. Money does corrupt." Reduce the budget for the project –won't be able to solve the customer's problem

16. 16 Four Variables: Time Increase time and you improve quality and scope (more features) Too much time can hurt With too little time, quality suffers –and scope, time, and cost not far behind

17. 17 Four Variables: Quality Quality is a terrible control variable –Can make progress by sacrificing quality (write code solo or without tests) –But to cost--human, business, and technical-- can be enormous

18. 18 Four Variables: Scope Scope is the primary control –If you reduce scope (fewer features), you can increase quality, reduce time and cost –You can deliver the most important features sooner and cheaper

19. 19 The Values Essence of Extreme Programming (XP) –Variables –Values –Principles –Practices

20. 20 Four Values: Communication Communication –Customer centric Write "Stories", always available –Pair programming –Task estimation –Iteration planning –Design sessions The Agile Manifesto

21. 21 Four Values: Simplicity Simplicity –Choose the simplest thing that will work –Choose the simplest design, technology, algorithm, technique

22. 22 Four Values: Feedback Feedback very important –Small Iterations –Frequent deliveries –Pair programming –Constant code review –Continuous integration (add often to the build) –automated unit tests (JUnit, for example)

23. 23 The Principles Essence of Extreme Programming (XP) –Variables –Values –Principles –Practices

24. 24 Five Principles: Rapid Feedback Rapid Feedback –(From psychology) The time between an action and its feedback is critical to learning –In an XP project, developers provide and get feedback as soon as possible, interpret it, and put what is learned into the system

25. 25 Feedback Compiler feedback: seconds Pair programming feedback: half minutes Unit test feedback: few minutes Acceptance testing: half hours –Customer write these system level tests The developers need adapters (test fixtures) to make these pass Customer feedback: daily Iteration feedback: weekly –Feedback: Priceless

26. 26 Four Values: Courage Courage –Courage to refactor –Estimate: On a scale of 1 to 5, we can do that in 2 –Throw away bad code –Iteration planning –Automated testing breeds courage to change code

27. 27 Five Principles: Assume Simplicity Assume Simplicity –Only design for current iteration this is not the same as skipping design this is counterintuitive to most developers –Can save time on 98% of the problem and devote that time to the really difficult 2%, Beck –Plan for changes and design the system to handle change –Do a quality job (tests, refactoring, communication) and trust you can add complexity later

28. 28 Five Principles: Incremental Change Incremental Change –Problems are solved with a series of the smallest changes that make a difference –In XP, design changes a little at a time, the plan changes a little at a time, the team changes a little at a time –and adoption of XP must be taken in little steps

29. 29 Five Principles: Embracing Change Embracing Change –Preserve the most options while solving the most pressing problems

30. 30 Five Principles: Quality Work Quality work –People like to do a good job –Quality should be either excellent or extremely excellent (lives at stake) –Without quality you don't enjoy work you don't work well the project goes down the drain

31. 31 12 Practices: On-site customer Many software projects fail because they do not deliver software that meets business needs Real customer has to be part of the team –Defines business needs –Answers questions and resolves issues –Prioritizes features

32. 32 The Practices Essence of Extreme Programming (XP) –Variables –Values –Principles –Practices

33. 33 12 Practices: Planning Game The planning game involves story cards, which are short descriptions of a feature –Provide value to customer –Independent of each other –Testable Customer writes story cards and prioritizes them Developers estimate how long a story takes

34. 34 12 Practices: The planning game Business decisions (customer) –Scope: which “stories” should be developed –Priority of stories (features) –Release dates Technical decisions (developers) –Time estimates for features/stories –Elaborate consequences of business decisions –Team organization and process –Scheduling

35. 35 12 Practices: Estimation Based on similar stories from the past (“yesterday’s weather”) Team effort Get good at estimation simply by doing it Ideal Engineering Time (IET) –could be points Velocity = IET/Calendar Time –we can do 20 points each week –"Customer, which 20 points do you want next week?"

36. 36 12 Practices: Small Releases Releases should be as small as possible Should make sense as a whole Put system into production ASAP –Fast feedback Deliver valuable features first Short cycle time –Planning 1-2 months rather than 6-12 months

37. 37 12 Practices: Simple design The “right” design –Runs all tests –No code duplication, No code duplication –Fewest possible classes –Short methods –Fulfills all current business requirements Design for today not the future –But design so the system can change

38. 38 12 Practices: Metaphor How does the whole system work? What is the overall idea of the system? This is the least favorite or least misunderstood practice

39. 39 12 Practices: Testing Software should be tested, but it is often spotty or overlooked Automatic testing (JUnit, for example) help us know that a feature works and it will work after refactoring, additional code, and other changes Provides confidence in the program

40. 40 Testing Write tests at the same time as production code –Unit tests  developer –Feature/acceptance tests  customer Don't need a test for every method Testing can be used to drive development and design of code Allows for regression testing –Do changes break previously working code

41. 41 SIM/SQS http://www.simgroup.com/Consultancy/regression.html Regression Testing –re-testing of a previously tested program following modification to ensure that faults have not been introduced or uncovered as a result of changes. –Regression tests are designed for repeatability, and are often used when testing a second or later version of the system under test. –Regression testing can be carried out on all applications, including e-Commerce and web-based systems.

42. 42 Testing Strong emphasis on regression testing –Unit tests need to execute all the time –Tests for completed features need to execute all the time Unit tests pass 100% Acceptance tests (we haven't seen these) show progress on which user stories are working Other testing frameworks include –JMeter, HttpUnit, JProbe, OptimizeIt, CPPUnit

43. 43 12 Practices: Refactoring Restructure code without changing the functionality Goal: Keep design simple –Change bad design when you find it –Remove dead code Examples at Martin Fowler's Web site: http://www.refactoring.com/ see online cataloghttp://www.refactoring.com/

44. 44 12 Practices: Pair programming Write production code with 2 people on one machine –Person 1: Implements the method –Person 2: Thinks strategically about potential improvements, test cases, issues Pairs change all the time. Has advantages such as –No single expert on any part of the system –Continuous code reviews, fewer defects –Cheaper in the long run, and more fun Problems: –Not all people like it –Pairs need to be able to work together

45. 45 12 Practices: Collective ownership All code can be changed by anybody on the team Everybody is required to improve any portion of bad code s/he sees Everyone has responsibility for the system Individual code ownership tends to create experts

46. 46 12 Practices: Continuous integration formerly known as the 40 hour work week Integration happens after a few hours of development 1.Checkout build with your changes, 2.Make sure all tests pass (green bar) 3.In case of errors: Do not put changes into the build Fix problems 4.Checkin the system to the integration machine 5.Go to 1

47. 47 Continuous Integration Find problems early Can see if a change breaks the system more quickly -- while you remember the details Small increments

48. 48 Continuous Integration Developing full speed only works with fresh people Working overtime for two weeks in a row indicates problem Working overtime can help the first week, and hurt the next week An XP day can be more exhausting, but you can get more done in 40 hours than 60

49. 49 12 Practices: Coding standards Coding Standard –Naming conventions and style –Least amount of work possible: Code should exist once and only once Team has to adopt a coding standard –Makes it easier to understand other people’s code –Avoids code changes because of syntactic preferences

50. 50 Project Size XP was designed for small teams: 2-20 Case studies show it can scale Practical advice and modifications are presented in Jutta Eckstein's new book –Agile Software Development in the Large http://jeckstein.com/agilebook/index.html

51. 51 Become Agile Become Part of the Agile movement –Rick is student volunteer chair for Agile 2006 –July 23-28 2005 in Minneapolis MN –http://www.agile2006.org/http://www.agile2006.org/