1. MISSION M&E PRESENTATION
Jean Claude Randrianarisoa
Senior Economist, M&E Officer
USAID/Madagascar

2. We will have better understanding of
USAID Use of M&E Data
USAID Requirements in terms of Data
List of Mission Requested Indicators

3. A. Structure B. M&E Activities C. FFP Indicators

4. Cross-Cutting Indicators
F STANDARD FRAMEWORK
Democracy and Governance
Investing in People
Economic Growth
GOAL
Program Area
Program Element
Cross-Cutting Indicators
Health
Agriculture
Infrastructure
Nutrition
Agricultural Enabling Environment
Transport Services

5. Mission M&E Activities Involving FFP Projects
Portfolio Review
Annual Report (PPR)
Monitoring
Data Quality Assessments
Evaluations

6. Portfolio Review Goals: How are we doing?
Twice a year (June-July and December)
Usually use Outcome data for the discussions (Collected by Third Party e.g OMS)
Outcomes may affect targets, indicators, program implementation

7. Activities/Projects + Survey DATA
Portfolio Review
Mission
FSDA/FFP
Activities/Projects + Survey DATA

8. Annual Performance Report (PPR)
USAID/Mission role to report on FFP achievement to Washington
Once a year (Oct - Nov)
Start Data request by mid-October
Report Achievements from 10/01/FYXX to 09/30 FYXX
Revise Targets for FY XX+1/2/3
Directly linked to the IPTT

9. Annual Performance Report (PPR)
Report Achievement,
Explain any Deviation from Targets (+/- 10%)
Non-Cumulative (Often)
Revise Targets
Provide rationale for Targets
Plan for Target Changes (o/a April)

10. Monitoring Site Visits (ad hoc) including Routine DQA
Outcome Monitoring Survey for Health (Status of selected indicators by district)
USAID Performance Indicators Database System
USAID Data Stewards

11. Data Quality Assessment
For F-Indicators in the PPR
At least once every three years
Routine DQA as needed

12. Evaluations For Specific Food Security Evaluations  FFP
For evaluation questions related to other DO:
Coordination between USAID/HPN USAID/ENV and FSDA

13. Evaluations (2015-2017) Performance and Skills of CHWs
Impact of microfinance on households’ social expenditures/investments
Compliance to environmental measures

14. INDICATORS for FFP

15. INDICATORS Most of them the same as FFP Indicators
Collected by the two Projects
May have different reporting requirements
Reported at the Mission level (not project)

16. INDICATORS
Shall have the same definition, method of collect and calculation…
Shall have PIRS
Definition & Measurement Unit
Data Collection (frequency, POC, costs)
DQA and Limitation
Baseline &Targets

17. INDICATOR
Number of people trained in child health and nutrition through USG-supported programs
Number of people (health professionals, primary health care workers, community health workers, volunteers, non-health personnel) trained in child health care and child nutrition through USG-supported programs

18. INDICATOR
Number of children under five reached by USG-supported nutrition programs
Number of children reached by programs that promote good infant and young child feeding and/or growth promotion programs
Promotion of good infant and young child feeding practices, including breastfeeding, and participation in community based growth monitoring and promotion (GMP), are essential in preventing malnutrition and improving child survival.

19. Prevalence of households with moderate or severe hunger
INDICATOR
Prevalence of households with moderate or severe hunger
The HHS is a food deprivation scale that measures the percentage of households experiencing the following three categories of food deprivation:

20. 3.1.8.2-2 Number of people gaining access to improved sanitation
and
Number of people gaining access to improved drinking water source
Number of people gaining access to improved sanitation

21. INDICATOR
Number of people benefiting from USG-supported social assistance programming
Number of people receiving assistance (cash, food, or other in-kind) from programs supported in whole or in part through USG resources.

22. INDICATOR
Number of beneficiaries receiving improved transport services due to USG assistance
Each grantee will identify the infrastructure that has been supported with USAID funding
We need to ensure consistency across award
What is the method to estimate the number of beneficiaries?

23. Kilometers of roads constructed or repaired with USG assistance
INDICATOR
Kilometers of roads constructed or repaired with USG assistance
Length of road constructed or rehabilitated indicates increased access to improved transport for more rapid and sustained economic growth and social development.

24. Farmer's gross margin per unit of land (for selected crop)
INDICATOR
Farmer's gross margin per unit of land (for selected crop)
The gross margin is the difference between the total value of production of the agricultural product (crop, fish) and the cost of producing that item, divided by the total number of units in production (hectares of crops, fish pond area in hectares).

25. Farmer's gross margin per unit of animal INDICATOR 4.5-17
The gross margin is the difference between the total value of production of the agricultural product (milk, eggs, livestock) and the cost of producing that item, divided by the total number of animals in production.

26. Number of hectares with irrigation and drainage services
INDICATOR
Number of hectares with irrigation and drainage services
This indicator measures the total area of land provided with irrigation and drainage services under the project, including in (i) the area provided with new irrigation and drainage services, and (ii) the area provided with improved irrigation and drainage services, expressed in hectare (ha).

27. INDICATOR
Number of hectares under improved technologies or management practices as a result of USG assistance
This indicator measures the area (in hectares) of land or water (for fisheries) first brought under new technology during the current reporting year. Any technology that was first adopted in a previous reporting year should be marked as “Continuing”. Technologies to be counted here are agriculture-related technologies.
Relevant technologies include mechanical and physical; biological; chemical; management and cultural practices
Double Counting Issues

28. INDICATOR
Number of farmers and others who have applied new technologies or management practices as a result of USG assistance
This indicator measures the total number of farmers, ranchers and other primary sector producers, individual processors (not firms), rural entrepreneurs, managers and traders, natural resource managers, etc. that applied new technologies anywhere within the food and fiber system as a result of USG assistance.

29. INDICATOR
Number of individuals who have received USG supported short term agricultural sector productivity or food security training
This includes farmers, ranchers, fishers, and other primary sector producers who receive training in a variety of best practices in productivity, post-harvest management, linking to markets, etc.
This should include training on food security, water resources management, sustainable agriculture, and climate change resilience, but should not include nutrition-related trainings, which should be reported under indicator # instead.

30. Number of rural households benefiting directly from USG interventions
INDICATOR
Number of rural households benefiting directly from USG interventions
A household is a beneficiary if it contains at least one individual who is a beneficiary. An individual is a beneficiary if s/he is engaged with a project activity or s/he comes into direct contact with the set of interventions (goods or services) provided by the project. Individuals merely contacted or involved in an activity through brief attendance (non-recurring participation) does not count as a beneficiary.

31. INDICATOR
Total number of clients (households and/or microenterprises) benefiting from financial services provided through USG-assisted financial intermediaries, including non-financial institutions or actors
The total number of borrowers, savers, and clients of other financial services such as micro credit and savings served by the USG-assisted intermediaries

32. Number of financial intermediaries supported by USG assistance
INDICATOR
Number of financial intermediaries supported by USG assistance
Number of financial intermediaries supported by USG assistance serving poor households and microenterprises, including non-financial institutions or actors.

33. GNDR2
Percentage of female participants in USG-assisted programs designed to increase access to productive economic resources (assets, credit, income or employment)
Productive economic resources include: assets - land, housing, businesses, livestock or financial assets such as savings; credit; wage or self-employment; and income.

34. GNDR4
Percentage of participants reporting increased agreement with the concept that males and females should have equal access to social, economic, and political opportunities.)
This indicator will be used to gauge the effectiveness of USG efforts to promote gender equality by measuring changes in participants’ attitudes about whether men and women should have equal opportunities in social, political, and economic spheres.

35. Outcome and Impact Indicators
Prevalence of underweight children under 5
Prevalence of stunted children under 5 years of age
Exclusive breastfeeding
Prevalence of Poverty: Percent of people living on less than $1.25/day
Per capita expenditures (as a proxy for income) of USG‐targeted beneficiaries
WASH Indicators in terms of Percentage