1. for Road Applications EGNOS and Galileo for efficient road network management Fiammetta Diani GSA - Market Development Officer

2. Objective of the presentation Mobility demand and GNSS market in road: which priorities and market opportunities? Why EGNOS (and Galileo) in road applications? Think now about EGNOS and Galileo in road applications: which support from EC/GSA? Trends Opportunities Actions 2

3. Agenda Mobility demand and GNSS market in road: which priorities and market opportunities? Trends 3

4. Growing mobility demand and pressure on budgets 1.10% of Europe’s roads are congested; mobility demand continues to grow 2.Pressure on national budgets to build or scale up roads 3.Costly economic and environmental externalities Vehicle usage in large European countries (2003-08) 2003 2008 France Germany UK Million vehicle-kilometres The road infrastructure needs to be better used Source: GSA/UNECE 4/18

5. SatNav-enabled vehicles in Europe* (2010-30) A huge market potential for services and applications needs to be exploited… Source: GSA-MMFT 20302928272625242322212019181716151413 65 12 53 11 43 2010 34 Sat-Nav penetration in road vehicles (%) Stock of Sat-Nav equipped road vehicles (mln units) >330 Users have already decided…

6. …Policy makers have a great opportunity Galileo - Road monetized benefits (Millions of Euros, cumulated 2010-2030) ~ 2.000 lives saved Galileo - Road non-monetized benefits (cumulated 2010-2030) ~ 14.000 new jobs Cost savings decrease of injuries*

7. Which priorities for GNSS in Road

8. Road Network Management: new schemes and regulation impact EETS: 2004/52/EC + Decision 2009/750 –EETS must be compatible with both DSRC and GNSS systems, but GNSS is recommended for new systems due to its flexibility Eurovignette: 2006/38/EC –Harmonizes taxation of HGVs >3.5t using TENs –By 2012 they should be all tolled GNSS adopted /decision taken GNSS under evaluation 8

9. GNSS customers in road pricing will grow in Europe # of GNSS OBUs in EU-27 (millions) The new regulatory framework combined with the introduction of new schemes are expected to push strongly GNSS adoption in Europe 9

10. 1.Flexibility to adapt over time as road networks/ traffic evolve 2.Cost efficiency: no capital-intensive toll gate infrastructure 3.Holistic approach to traffic management (all roads/ specific roads, all vehicles/ specific vehicle types, e.g. HGVs) 4.Interoperability in pan-European network 5.New business opportunity for Value Added Services Why GNSS in Road Network Management?

11. Agenda Why EGNOS (and Galileo) in road applications? Opportunities 11

12. EGNOS: early adopters  Most receivers nowadays are EGNOS-enabled and not more costly as the non EGNOS-enabled ones.  EGNOS OS is for free: therefore, the cost of using EGNOS is marginal.  Benefits exist now even if they are under demonstration.  You take decisions now for systems to be applied in the future (technology improves, benefits will be demonstrated).  So, why not using EGNOS together with GPS ?  ENI early EGNOS adopter: thanks to an independent test, ENI is equipping national and international fleet (1,500 trucks) with EGNOS OBU.

13. EGNOS integrity: versus a guaranteed position  Operators (toll chargers, EETS, public authorities, logistic operators) may need to provide in the future a guarantee of positioning for GNSS-based road pricing schemes (to prevent or manage claims), in regulated transport (e.g. dangerous goods) or in co-modal and just-in-time logistics, ensuring a high service quality.  EGNOS can help providing a guarantee of position, providing a level of confidence to the user. Protection Level Error

14. Mentore results: 1 and 2 – nuclear transport by road  Two vehicles: Big truck & trailer only extra-urban roads (# 1) Truck extra-urban & urban roads (# 2)  On board Unit using EGNOS Open Signal (Signal in Space)  Protection Level calculated at the Service Centre

15. Mentore results: 3 – intermodal freight container  Container rail/ terminal areas (# 3)  On board Unit using EGNOS Open Signal (Signal in Space)  Protection Level calculated at the Service Centre

16. Mentore results: 4 & 5 – urban logistics  Two vans urban roads: In the city centre/ inside the LTZ (thus narrow streets) (# 4) Outside the LTZ (less narrow streets) (# 5)  On Board Unit EGNOS Open Signal  Protection Level calculated at the Service Centre  EGNOS corrections assisted function

17. Mentore: comparison of results Different EGNOS performances in different operational conditions 1234512345 1 2 3 4 5

18. Implementing EGNOS CS/EDAS large scale/live operations of dangerous goods transport in the three EU countries (Italy, France and Austria), by: Turning proven demonstration into operation Leading research into fruition Scutum: EGNOS CS/EDAS adoption and standardisation A technolgy step forward in: 1) Optimization of the processing to further increase the availability of HPL calculations/ guarantee of position 2) multipath mitigation -> to improve the HPL solution

19. Agenda Think now about EGNOS and Galileo in road applications: which support from EC/GSA? Actions 19

20. Support from EC/GSA: quantify GNSS economic benefits SOCIAL BENEFITS MONETARY BENEFITS OPEX CAPEX - CASH FLOW STREAM NPV GNSS (GPS only) - = OUTPUT = INPUT WACC NPV GNSS (GPS + EGNOS) NPV DSRC The cost benefit analysis will assess GNSS/ EGNOS value added by player: –Service Providers (incl. EETS) –Toll Chargers –Public Entities Different schemes could be considered, e.g.: Universal/ HGVs only Motorways/ Country schemes Key Europe-wide examples have already been assessed

21. HGV scheme in France: GNSS shows a considerably higher NPV than DSRC free flow MAIN ASSUMPTIONS Total OBUs (# Mio – HGV* only)  2010: 0.87 → 2030: 4.5 Road network (k km)  2010: 13 → 2030: 16.5 Traffic volumes (Mld vehicle-km)  2010: 11.2 → 2030: 12.6 Stock of vehicles (# Mio)  2010: 4.2 → 2030: 5.8 Toll fee (€-km)  2010: 0.12 → 2030: 0.30 ETC transactions on tolled roads (%)  2010: 100% → 2030:100% VAS (Infomobility)  5.0 €/ month  Users: 100% HGV Toll Charger and Service Provider: include faster adoption and possibility to charge additional roads Public Entities: include environmental impact Net benefits by operator (the French case**) (Mld €) 52 BUSINESS CASES PRELIMINARY Note: * > 3.5t ; ** The simulation is based on estimates on the eco-tax (GNSS or DSRC Free Flow systems to be applied to a large network of non-conceded motorways and local roads). To make the simulation comparable with other cases some elements are different from the actual bid: there is not a bonus/ malus scheme for the TC (but revenues from tolling instead) and the SP is in charge of fraud costs (as opposed to the actual bid, where they are sustained by the Public authority) Objective: to assess the economics of key road tolling technologies if applied only to HGVs in a large network formed mainly by motorways 49

22. All-vehicles all roads scheme in the Netherlands MAIN ASSUMPTIONS Total OBUs (# Mio)  2012: 7 → 2030: 9.9 (LV/ PC)  2012: 1 → 2030: 1.8 (HGV*) Road network (k km)  2012: 124.5 → 2030: 156 Traffic volumes (Mld vehicle-km)  2012: 13.8 → 2030: 18.5 (LV/ PC)  2012: 6.3 → 2030: 8.5 (HGV*) Stock of vehicles (# Mio)  2012: 7.8 → 2030: 9.9 (LV/ PC)  2012: 1.2 → 2030: 1.8 (HGV*) Toll fee (€-km)  2012: 0.03 → 2030: 0.2 (LV/ PC)  2012: 0.06 → 2030: 0.4 (HGV*) GNSS transactions on tolled roads (%)  2012: 90% → 2030: 100% VAS (Infomobility)  0.5 €/ month (LV/ PC)  1.0 €/ month (HGV)  Users: 100% LV/PC and HGV Net benefits by operator (the Dutch case*) (Mld €) 48 BUSINESS CASES PRELIMINARY Note: * The simulation is based on estimates on the ABvM case (GNSS system will be applied from 2012 in all existing roads); ** > 3.5t ; *** 2.5 €/month for PC/ LV and 5 €/ month for HGV for VAS (including infomobility) Objective: to assess the economics of a universal country-wide RUC scheme based on GNSS 52

23. Support from EC/GSA: demonstrate EGNOS benefits Several EGNOS trials and initiatives GSA/EC encourage Toll Chargers/ Service Providers to trial on the field EGNOS value added DG ENTR recently launched: “The Assessment of the utilization of EGNOS in the road transport domain”. Expected results in second half 2011

24. Support from EC/GSA: business development to identify VAS opportunities SOS PAYD / PPU Stolen vehicle recovery Location and tracking (also dangerous goods) Fleet management Usage report Intelligent maintenance (RVD) Navigation Off board navigation Concierge Weather POI Map/POI update Real time traffic Info Special maps Georeferenced services E-call Services based on the user  Use of HMI for information exchange with the driver Services based on the vehicle  Location based services without driver interaction Infomobility and sustainable mobility  Services related to strong political relationship with institutions Access management 24

25. Seize first-mover advantages Don't be overtaken! www.egnos-portal.eu Fiammetta.Diani@gsa.europa.eu

26. Back up

27. What is EGNOS?  EGNOS is the first European SatNav system  EGNOS improves the accuracy of position measurements by transmitting signals that correct GPS data and provide information on its reliability  EGNOS is composed of transponders aboard three geostationary satellites and a ground network of about 40 positioning stations and four control centres.  EGNOS is available and free of charges TechnologyAccuracyImprovement GPS10m GPS + EGNOS corrections 2mIncreased accuracy + Integrity

28.  Phase 1 “prototyping”:  Beta test users  Freely available to all, after registration  Service Definition phase  Experimental service until end of 2010  Phase 2: Service Provision (as from 2011) EGNOS Data Access Server - EDAS Value-added service provider End users EGNOS data (real-time): RIMS raw observations SBAS messages User-specific information EGNOS Services – EDAS