Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Accounting for age-specific sex-limitation in IgE QTL linkage analysis: example of 11p13 Manuel A R Ferreira, David Duffy & Nick Martin Queensland Institute.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Accounting for age-specific sex-limitation in IgE QTL linkage analysis: example of 11p13 Manuel A R Ferreira, David Duffy & Nick Martin Queensland Institute."— Presentation transcript:

1 Accounting for age-specific sex-limitation in IgE QTL linkage analysis: example of 11p13 Manuel A R Ferreira, David Duffy & Nick Martin Queensland Institute of Medical Research Australia

2 Accounting for non-additive genetic effects in IgE QTL linkage analysis: example of 11p13 Manuel A R Ferreira, David Duffy & Nick Martin Queensland Institute of Medical Research Australia

3 2 453786 101191213 14151617181920 12122XY Replicated regions @ p 1.2) – Ober et al. (2000) ADAM33 PHF11 DPP10 EHF, ELF5 (11p13) FCER1B GPRA Positionally cloned genes Genetics of asthma EHF and ELF5 (11p13) not replicated

4 Patent reports suggestive linkage (p = 0.0001) of asthma to D11S907 and association to D11S2008 (p < 0.0001) Brooks-Wilson et al. (1998) filed a US patent for ELF5 and EHF, asthma susceptibility genes 6/27 Linkage and association of asthma to 11p13 One extended pedigree from Tristan-da-Cunha island (n=282), with high prevalence of asthma. Own replication with a small sample of Canadian nuclear families with 1+ asthmatic children. Baron et al. (2002) failed to replicate association of asthma to ELF5 and EHF, small number of SNPs (4+3)

5 Problem: can we replicate linkage of asthma to 11p13? 7/27

6 1995-1998 QIMR Asthma & Allergy study 8/27 Replication of Linkage to 11p13 – large Australian dataset 802 families, mean size 4 (range 1-10), mostly parents and children Each family with at least 1 asthmatic child 2500+ individuals with phenotypic and genotypic data at candidate regions Extensive respiratory questionnaire (American Thoracic Society) Total Immunoglobulin E, Eosinophils, BHR, atopy, FEV 1 /FVC Dataset includes 490 DZ twin pairs and 312 MZ pairs

7 Significant Replication EHF 100 Kb VC lod IgE Variance components (VC) Additive QTL effects only Multipoint IBD Chr11 ELF5 D11S2008 D11S907 Similar with other phenotypes 1 Mb

8 Have we failed to replicate linkage of asthma to 11p13? Can it be a false negative result? 10/27

9 1. Hypothesis A:power? 11/27

10 α = 0.01 α = 0.0001 Size 3 (n = 128) Size 2 (n = 325) Size 4 (n = 38) Size 5+ (n = 6) Overall (n = 497) QTL magnitude (proportion total variance) NCP VC linkage test r = 0.25 Biallelic single QTL Additive effects only Perfect marker information θ = 0 Sham et al. (2000) 12/27

11 Comparable or better than most published asthma linkage studies Enough power QTL >25% variance 13/27

12 2. Hypothesis B: sex-specific age-of-onset? 14/27

13 Cumulative incidence Age (years) n = 949 doctor diagnosed asthmatics Kaplan-Meier survival curves for age of first wheeze Similar results for atopy Mean age-of-onset. Males: 8.2 (7.2-9.2). Females: 11.8 (11-12.5) Males have earlier onset of asthma/atopy 15/27

14 Can this affect linkage analysis? yes, it if affects the expression of phenotypes, such as IgE 16/27

15 Same-sex sib-pairs Opposite-sex sib-pairs Young (age ≤ 20) Older (age > 20) 17/27 r = 0.08 (-0.07-0.23) r = 0.36 (0.24-0.47) r = 0.25 (0.12-0.37) r = 0.16 (0.04-0.28) Sib 2 IgE Sib 1 IgE n = 858 sib-pairs r = 0.23 Not observed with other phenotypes

16 When tested formally by maximum likelihood estimation, only 8/802 (1%) families were found to be significantly inconsistent with a model that assumed homogenous sib-correlation. Low IgE correlation young opposite-sex sib-pairs was unrelated to sex-specific age-of-onset, likely to be of stochastic nature 18/27 True heterogenous sib-pair correlation for IgE confounder linkage analysis Follow up of these families did not reveal any plausible epidemiological explanation for male/female discordance

17 Other issues could explain failure to replicate 11p13? 19/27

18 3. Hypothesis C: non-additive genetic effects? 20/27

19 Monozygotic twins IgE Eosinophils 21/27 r = 0.17 (0.07-0.27) r = 0.68 (0.61-0.74) r = 0.13 (0.00-0.25) r = 0.56 (0.43-0.67) Dizygotic twins Suggestive of dominance, epistasis? Twin 2 Twin 1

20 Significant Replication VC lod ELF5 EHF 100 Kb Chr11 22/27 2-df test Fulker et al. (1999) linkage & association model implemented in QTDT (Abecasis et al. 2000). Similar results with SOLAR (Almasy & Blangero 1998) Chr11 IgE

21 Significant Replication ELF5 EHF 100 Kb Chr11 VC lod Eosinophils 23/27 Type 1 error? Chr11 D11S2008 774F D11S907

22 120 453786 101191213 14151617181920 21222324 2526 Frequency Chi-square 16.91 (LOD = 2.98), p = 0.008 Marker 774F Eosinophils 24/27 Meets criteria for replication (p < 0.01) Simulated genotypic data for the 11p13 region (9 markers), unlinked to the trait 5,000 replicates 2-df test Replicates and IBDs obtained from Merlin (Abecasis et al. 2002) Analysis performed with QTDT (Abecasis et al. 2000) Empirical type 1 Error

23 Have we replicated linkage of asthma to 11p13? 25/27

24 1. Initially failed to replicate linkage to 11p13 on an additive model 26/27 2. Enough power to detect a QTL >25% of total variance 3. Failure to replicate not a consequence of unaccounted sex differences 6. Statistical validity of dominance tests to be investigated Summary 4. Failure to replicate due to unmodelled non-additive genetic effects ? 5. Replication when modelling dominance

25 Acknowledgements 1. All participating families 2. Project team 3. Everyone @ Genetic Epidemiology, QIMR Nick Martin David Duffy Melbourne Colin Robertson Tim Newson Marita Dalton Perth Peter LeSouef Nigel Dore Sunalene Devadason Sydney Jennifer Peat Brett Toelle Janet Li [Sequana] Lon Cardon Brisbane Dixie Statham Barbara Haddon Olivia Zheng Louise Mattick 27/27 4. Scholarship SFRH/4824/2001, FCT - Portugal


Download ppt "Accounting for age-specific sex-limitation in IgE QTL linkage analysis: example of 11p13 Manuel A R Ferreira, David Duffy & Nick Martin Queensland Institute."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google