Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Relationship between Engineering & Architecture References: The Tower and the Bridge by David Billington Bridging the Gap, Proceedings of the Building.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The Relationship between Engineering & Architecture References: The Tower and the Bridge by David Billington Bridging the Gap, Proceedings of the Building."— Presentation transcript:

1 The Relationship between Engineering & Architecture References: The Tower and the Bridge by David Billington Bridging the Gap, Proceedings of the Building Arts Forum

2 Designers of Three Dimensional Public Spaces Architects Structural Engineers Sculptors

3 3 Measures of Design Performance Efficiency Scientific Dimension Use of Minimal Natural Resouces Economy Social Dimension Use of Minimal Public Resources Must Consider Material Costs & Constructability Elegance Symbolic Dimension Aesthetic Motivation of the Designer

4 Efficiency Form Controls the Forces Form Changes the Actions & Reactions

5 Economy Dependant upon Time & Place Quantities are measurable but… labor & bidding process are not

6 Nervi A builder and designer of new forms “..searching for solutions that were intrinsically and constructionally the most economic.. ”

7 Constructability Roebling numerous dwgs & studies of construction methods

8 Constructability Eiffel 5000 dwgs of parts & assembly techniques close relationship w/ contractor refinement of design Pia Maria bridge -> Garabit Viaduct Span: 165m, Material: wrought iron

9 Constructability Morandi detailed investigations of construction process Span: 100m, Rise: 20m, Ravine Depth: 110m

10 Candela Hyperbolic paraboloid concrete shells “..the only way to be an artist in this difficult specialty of building is to be your own contractor. ”

11 Elegance Aesthetic ideas can be traced back to Viollet le Duc, Entretiens, (1863, 1872) Theories on the importance of structural expression and construction techniques

12 Engineering v. Science Engineering (Technology) is: the making of things that did not previously exist creation of specific objects Science is: the discovery of things that have long existed creation of general theories that unify knowledge To what extent does technological innovation flow from scientific discovery?

13 Methodology Scientific Analysis Visual Analysis Empirical Analysis

14 Synthesis of Methodologies ETH, Zurich, Three Principles of Professor Ritter importance of calculations, attempts to simplify analytical procedures engineers have major responsibilities during construction importance of full scale load tests

15 Robert Maillart evolution of three- hinged concrete arch bridges visual & empirical methods Stauffacher Bridge, 39.6m Zuoz Bridge, 38.3m Tavanasa Bridge, 51m

16 The Relationship between Engineering & Architecture Schism Collaboration Synthesis

17 Schism separation between architect, engineer and constructor pre-schism architect was the “ Master Builder ” ie Brunelleschi

18 What Lead to the Schism: Industrial Revolution introduced new materials, methods and aspirations specialized schools were established Ecole des Beaux Arts ETH, Zurich architectural curricula focused on: visual methods product engineering curricula focused on: numeric methods process

19 Role of the Architect Today Venturi: “ The Decorated Shed ”

20 Role of the Architect Today Jorn Utzon, Sydney Opera House

21 Role of the Architect Today Owens Corning HQ: Toledo, OH CMU CBPD team exterior architect interior architect production drawing architect curtainwall architect engineering disciplines construction manager

22 Role of the Engineer Today technician vs innovator synthesis of scientific & empirical knowledge debate is raging over appropriate curriculum

23 De Menil Gallery: Piano & Rice

24 Two Primary Definitions Of Design The many ways of describing design, which in turn need to make the assumption that what counts as a legitimate display of design knowledge has been ‘agreed upon’, has been partially rationalised by [Kees] Dorst. Dorst cast the debate as a dialectic between Simon’s rational problem-solving paradigm and Schön’s reflective practice approach. Willemien Visser “Design: one, but in different forms” (2008) slide from D.Willis, PSU

25 Two Primary Definitions Of Design: Rational Problem-solving slide from D.Willis, PSU... The boundary between well-structured and ill-structured problem solving is indeed a vague and fluid boundary... there may be nothing other than the size of the knowledge base to distinguish ill-structured problems from well- structured problems, and that general problem- solving mechanisms... should be extendable to ill-structured domains without any need for introducing qualitatively new components. Herbert A. Simon “The Structure of Ill-structured Problems” Artificial Intelligence 4 (1973)

26 Two Primary Definitions Of Design: Reflective Practice Conversely, Schön embraces the inherent complexity of design and regards purely rational approaches with their reductionist tendencies and emphasis on quantitative data as unable to cope with the realities of design in practice. The ‘reflective practitioner’ must apply knowledge and experience to each unique circumstance. Willemien Visser “Design: one, but in different forms” (2008) slide from D.Willis, PSU

27 Schön Questions The Utility Of Any Particular Fixed Design Method Because the unique case falls outside of the categories of existing theory and technique, the practitioner cannot treat it as an instrumental problem to be solved by applying one set of rules in her store of professional knowledge. Donald Schön Educating the Reflective Practitioner (1987) slide from D.Willis, PSU

28 A Continuum Based On Dominant Design Paradigm __________________________________________________ Rational problem-solvers Reflective practitioners “ Simonists ” “ Schönians ” Note: the choice of which paradigm to favor is not necessarily an informed one; for most design professionals, it is determined by education, culture and experience, rather than a systematic examination of the available data and theories. slide from D.Willis, PSU

29 ________________________________________________________ Rational problem-solvers Reflective practitioners “ Simonists ” “ Schönians ” A Continuum Based On Dominant Design Paradigm Strong emphasis on methodology Weak emphasis on methodology Mass-production orientation Oriented to one-off artifacts Context idealized or ignored Context of paramount importance Efficiency stressed Efficiency a secondary concern slide from D.Willis, PSU

30 Two Different Viewpoints How does the understanding of space/ structure from two different viewpoints affect the project

31 Kimball Art Museum: Kahn & Kommendant Is it a Barrel Vault or is it an Inverted “ T ” ?

32 Collaboration a close working relationship between individuals from different backrounds mutual respect common vocabulary

33 CCTV: Koolhaus + Arup

34 Japan Pavilion Expo 2000: Buro Happold + Ban + Otto

35 BMW Welt: Coop Himmelb(l)au + B&G

36 Mercedes Museum: UN Studio + Werner Sobek

37 Soumaya Museum: LAR + Fineout + Gehry Technologies

38

39

40

41 Synthesis Can there be a modern day “ master builder ” ? Nervi, Candela, Wright, Rogers, Calatrava

42 Can the synthetic process be one of skillful coordination? Specialists and manufacturers are taking a bigger role in the process Maki, Fujisawa, Gymnasium Roof Ando, Mt Rokko Chapel, Ground Glass Foster, Hong Kong Shanghai Bank

43 Synthesis Can we transfer technologies and solutions from other disciplines? NASA, composites, ceramics, polymers

44 Synthesis Can the synthetic process be a redefinition of the problem? Traditional process client, architect, builder design - bid - build Owens Corning Process CM hires specialized disciplines

45 Conclusion No definitive answers CMU curriculum helps to expose you to these issues so that you are better prepared for the future but, while you have architects & engineers for teachers you do not collaborate with engineering students in the studio Push yourselves to understand the relationship between engineering & architecture through the vehicle of this studio


Download ppt "The Relationship between Engineering & Architecture References: The Tower and the Bridge by David Billington Bridging the Gap, Proceedings of the Building."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google