Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Group 1 Phillips Beaulac Hard Wasmund Licata Group 2 Stege Zmudczynski Lisiecki Hoyt Bercel Group 3 Hauser Ott Facine Lane Poniatowski Group 4 Cooper Miller.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Group 1 Phillips Beaulac Hard Wasmund Licata Group 2 Stege Zmudczynski Lisiecki Hoyt Bercel Group 3 Hauser Ott Facine Lane Poniatowski Group 4 Cooper Miller."— Presentation transcript:

1 Group 1 Phillips Beaulac Hard Wasmund Licata Group 2 Stege Zmudczynski Lisiecki Hoyt Bercel Group 3 Hauser Ott Facine Lane Poniatowski Group 4 Cooper Miller Riddock Pius Sherman Group 5 Patchak Fassero Randolph Capp Brech Group 6 Buszke Pascoe Vaughn Wahl Fowler Riley Group 7 Mazer Kammerer Freeman Haezebrouck Luthe Vargo Exam 1 Review Group Assignments

2 Exam 1 Score Distribution (46311)

3 Item 12345678910 Difficulty 0.810.750.470.500.690.970.780.690.670.75 Power 0.28 0.390.440.170.060.330.280.440.28 Item11121314151617181920 Difficulty 0.580.750.360.470.580.610.720.780.97 Power 0.17 0.280.610.280.560.330.110.06 Item21222324252627282930 Difficulty 0.970.860.830.970.750.390.970.81 0.58 Power 0.060.170.220.060.280.110.060.28 0.39 Item Analysis for Examination 1 (46311): Scores adjusted by +2 Average item difficulty =.72 Average Item Power =.25 Easier items (blue):.85-.99 Medium items (white):.60-.84 Harder items (pink):.45-.60 Problematic Items (yellow): <.45


Download ppt "Group 1 Phillips Beaulac Hard Wasmund Licata Group 2 Stege Zmudczynski Lisiecki Hoyt Bercel Group 3 Hauser Ott Facine Lane Poniatowski Group 4 Cooper Miller."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google