Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Blue Hills NPI Area Report March, 2003. Blue Hills Structure Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with Residential Structures 1.Roof Rating3.598.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Blue Hills NPI Area Report March, 2003. Blue Hills Structure Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with Residential Structures 1.Roof Rating3.598."— Presentation transcript:

1 Blue Hills NPI Area Report March, 2003

2

3

4

5 Blue Hills Structure Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with Residential Structures 1.Roof Rating3.598 2.Foundation/Wall Rating4.187 3.Window/Door Rating4.038 4.Porch Rating3.862 5.Exterior Paint Rating3.719 Structure Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5)3.881 Average Ratings by Residential TypeSingle FamilyMulti-family 3.8783.955 Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

6

7 Blue Hills Grounds Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with Residential Structures Parcels with No Structure 1.Private Sidewalk/Drive Rating3.6972.333 2.Lawn/Shrub Rating4.0894.296 3.Nuisance Vehicle Rating4.5684.704 4.Litter Rating4.7184.602 5.Open Storage Rating4.8114.796 6.Accessory Structure Rating3.6023.833 Grounds Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5)4.3224.576 Average Ratings by Residential TypeSingle FamilyMulti-family 4.3224.323 Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

8

9 Blue Hills Infrastructure Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with Residential Structures Parcels with No Structure 1.Public Sidewalk Rating4.0123.345 2.Curb Rating4.6284.313 3.Street Light Rating4.9764.880 4.Catch Basin Rating4.3054.283 5.Street Rating4.5084.414 Infrastructure Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5)4.4214.061 Average Ratings by Residential TypeSingle FamilyMulti-family 4.4374.037 Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

10

11 BLUE HILLS AREA - Single Family Housing Count Percent of Single Family Housing Single Family, Owner Occupied185461.9% Single Family, Not Owner Occupied107936.0% Single Family, Undetermined Occupancy Status622.1% Not Single Family Housing613 Source: KCMO Real Estate file, November, 2002

12

13

14

15 Vineyard NPI Area Report March, 2003

16

17

18

19 Vineyard Structure Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with Residential Structures 1.Roof Rating4.137 2.Foundation/Wall Rating4.429 3.Window/Door Rating4.411 4.Porch Rating4.425 5.Exterior Paint Rating4.250 Structure Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5)4.330 Average Ratings by Residential TypeSingle FamilyMulti-family 4.3284.711 Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

20

21 Vineyard Grounds Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with Residential Structures Parcels with No Structure 1.Private Sidewalk/Drive Rating4.0103.400 2.Lawn/Shrub Rating4.5313.158 3.Nuisance Vehicle Rating4.8274.761 4.Litter Rating4.8624.278 5.Open Storage Rating4.9024.750 6.Accessory Structure Rating4.1473.444 Grounds Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5)4.5824.161 Average Ratings by Residential TypeSingle FamilyMulti-family 4.5824.62 Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

22

23 Vineyard Infrastructure Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with Residential Structures Parcels with No Structure 1.Public Sidewalk Rating2.4452.162 2.Curb Rating4.1683.004 3.Street Light Rating4.9014.877 4.Catch Basin Rating4.2793.708 5.Street Rating4.6034.514 Infrastructure Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5)3.7453.230 Average Ratings by Residential TypeSingle FamilyMulti-family 3.7424.323 Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

24

25 VINEYARD AREA - Single Family Housing Count Percent of Single Family Housing Single Family, Owner Occupied111366.4% Single Family, Not Owner Occupied53431.9% Single Family, Undetermined Occupancy Status281.7% Not Single Family Housing299 Source: KCMO Real Estate file, November, 2002

26

27

28

29 Blue Valley NPI Area Report March, 2003

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37 Blue Valley Components of Change in Structure Ratings (2000 to 2002) Average RatingsParcels with Residential Structures 20002002Difference 1.Roof Rating3.5763.418-0.16 2.Foundation/Wall Rating4.2414.7680.53 3.Window/Door Rating4.0564.5780.52 4.Porch Rating3.7854.2080.42 5.Exterior Paint Rating3.734.3430.61 Structure Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5)3.8834.2640.38 Average Ratings by Residential Type Single FamilyMulti-family 20002002Difference20002002Difference 3.8784.2640.394.1094.2790.17 Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA, and from a resurvey commissioned by the KCCDI. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

38

39

40 Blue Valley Components of Change in Grounds Ratings (November, 2000 to November, 2002) Average Ratings Parcels with Residential StructuresParcels with No Structure 20002002Diff20002002Diff 1.Private Sidewalk/Drive Rating3.6763.8880.212.8823.4000.52 2.Lawn/Shrub Rating4.2084.7420.534.0224.7490.73 3.Nuisance Vehicle Rating4.7094.7690.064.7854.8940.11 4.Litter Rating4.6884.676-0.014.5334.7530.22 5.Open Storage Rating4.7244.7660.044.7714.9820.21 6.Accessory Structure Rating3.5893.7150.133.5263.5710.05 Grounds Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5)4.3454.5240.184.4794.8240.35 Average Ratings by Residential Type Single FamilyMulti-family 20002002Difference20002002Difference 4.3414.5220.184.5624.6160.05 Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA, and from a resurvey commissioned by the KCCDI. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

41

42

43 Blue Valley Components of Change in Infrastructure Ratings (November, 2000 to November, 2002) Average Ratings Parcels with Residential StructuresParcels with No Structure 20002002Diff20002002Diff 1.Public Sidewalk Rating3.5073.5420.032.3382.4890.15 2.Curb Rating3.7313.9190.192.7022.8810.18 3.Street Light Rating4.9924.986-0.014.5474.5600.01 4.Catch Basin Rating4.2114.3650.154.1004.3080.21 5.Street Rating4.6854.8850.204.2094.4650.26 6. Infrastructure Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5)3.9834.1050.123.0903.2690.18 Average Ratings by Residential Type Single FamilyMulti-family 20002002Difference20002002Difference 3.9824.1020.124.0214.2730.25 Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA, and from a resurvey commissioned by the KCCDI. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information

44

45 BLUE VALLEY AREA - Single Family Housing (November, 2002) Count Percent of Single Family Housing Single Family, Owner Occupied148455.7% Single Family, Not Owner Occupied112242.1% Single Family, Undetermined Occupancy Status592.2% Not Single Family Housing693 Source: KCMO Real Estate file, November, 2002

46

47


Download ppt "Blue Hills NPI Area Report March, 2003. Blue Hills Structure Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with Residential Structures 1.Roof Rating3.598."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google