1. Collaborations that facilitate the scholarship of teaching: Working with education professionals and more! Ann C. Smith Jennifer Hayes-Klosteridis Paulette Robinson University of Maryland College Park MD ASM Division W, Washington D.C. 2003

2. Knowing what works How People Learn (2000) Bransford, Brown and Cocking eds Active learning strategies –Allowing students to become involved and take control of their own learning

3. Showing what works What are the best methods to employ? What strategies will be required to implement the methods. How can success be assessed?

4. Active learning – our goal Variety of strategies –Involve student participation –Give context to content –Discussion –Writing –Group work Problem based, Inquiry based, Case based

5. Challenges: Large enrollment, diverse backgrounds, complex, content rich subject Instructor

6. BSCI223 General Microbiology Pre- requisite: One course in General Biology Student population: Science students –Including biology, microbiology, soil science, kinesiology, psychology Large Lecture- 250 students Laboratory component

7. Establish a teaching team Other Science Faculty Education Faculty Graduate Teaching Assistants Undergraduate Teaching Assistants Solution: Enlarge the Instructor Base Collaborations enlarge the instructor base

8. Teaching Team – Science Faculty Faculty instructors –Ann Smith – Instructor –Patty Shields - Instructor –Richard Stewart & Jon Dinman – Associate Professors –Robert Yuan – Full Professor All PhD microbiologists each providing unique perspective to the team –Time spent with students, awareness of needs of our Undergraduates, Current Research topics, Global perspective of Science,

9. Teaching Team: Education Professionals Jennifer Hayes-Klosteridis –Masters degree in Biology –Ph.D candidate Education Policy, Planning and Leadership, UM College of Education Paulette Robinson –Ph.D. Education Policy, Planning and Leadership –Manager, Teaching Learning Support, OIT, UM Provide education perspective, knowledge of learning theory, and teaching methods, experience in education research.

10. Teaching Team: Graduate Assistants Life Sciences graduate students –Knowledge of the field –Experiences as a student, –Liaison with students

11. Teaching Team: UTA Undergraduate Teaching Assistants –Alumni of the course –Enroll for elective credit Undergraduate Technology Apprentice Program –Trained in technology –Knowledge of behind the scenes

12. Benefits of Collaboration  We can do more, Learn from each other Students become teaching “apprentices” Education professionals can ask questions about application of education theory to the discipline OIT professionals can ask questions about the use of technology by faculty and students. Science Faculty can ask questions about methods that facilitate the education of future scientists, or best attract students to the study of science.  Our teaching has evolved to scholarship

13. Costs of Collaboration Costs –No monetary cost Lab fees, University and Department grants – technology and travel. Goal was to use existing resources –Faculty/TA’s have to relinquish some control –Need for time to co-ordinate/meet discuss

14. Communication Add technology

15. Goal: Active Learning in a Large Enrollment Microbiology Class Approach Establish a teaching team where members work collaboratively to design, implement, and assess active learning strategies Use technology to establish an on-line learning center to provide a site/time for communication, organization, and active learning options

16. LAB Labs linked to lectures/cases Presentations 18 students/TA Lab reports PAK discussion questions Lecture outlines and power points Links to Resources Lab Review quizzes Lab Manual -pdf Virtual poster session On-line exam Small group On-line discussion of complex topics Discussion area for general questions Course Syllabus/Information/Announcements Course Surveys Links to databases Grades Case studies Directed Discussions LECTURE 250 students/instructor Question/Answer Lectures linked to labs/cases On-line Learning Center Communication Organization TimeAccess Active Learning

17. Results from UM General Education Course survey Participate Actively in Learning, Significant increase since 1993 review and All LL reviewed over time Mean Response

18. Qualitative Analysis – Have we engaged students in active learning? Constructed surveys –Delivered within WebCT Analysis of responses looking at themes What did you like about the on-line discussion? What did you learn from Case Study questions? What did you like about the use of technology?

19. Comment (350 students)ExampleNumber Negative response I Don’t like Web Ct7 Negative response Live off campus, difficult to down load or view pages 2 Positive Responses: Access and organization of information 24 hour access to everything! 152 Convenient, easy to useConvenient to have everything32 Options to communicate with students and course instructors A direct link to professors and students if I had a problem 58 On -line quizzes, I owe my fabulous lab practical grade to 80 Lecture outlinesThe best way to learn – allowed me to review 85 GradesGreat way to know what my current grade is. 59 Lab manualSaved money in not having to buy a lab manual 25

20. Teaching Team Dept of Cell Biology/Molecular Genetics College of Life Sciences Undergraduate Studies Center for Teaching Excellence Office of Information Technology Support Students ASMPKAL NCCS

21. Questions?

26. 350 Students Surveyed What do you like about the on-line discussion? –79 the opportunity to discuss with students! “so many different ideas and tangents to explore and learn about” –30 liked that they learned new information –Additional comments about the positive aspects about working in a group, meeting new people and being online provided flexibility in space and time